ADAPT: Benchmarking Commonsense Planning under Unspecified Affordance Constraints

Existing robot planning systems rely on appearance-based reasoning, where visual observations are encoded into latent spaces organized around object appearances (e.g., recognizing a "cart" based on how it looks). However, planning requires reasoning about task-relevant functionalities of objects (e.g., whether an object is "movable"), which appearance-based latent spaces do not capture. As a result, existing approaches struggle to generalize to novel robot-object interactions. We address this limited generalizability through affordance reasoning, enabling planning based on task-relevant object functionalities instead of appearance alone. We introduce A4D, which maps visual observations into a shared latent space structured around affordances (e.g., "movable"). By projecting visual observations into this functional latent space and measuring their proximity to affordances, A4D infers functionalities relevant to the observed object. Furthermore, we introduce an affordance discovery mechanism that expands the latent space to handle unseen scenarios where existing affordances are insufficient. A4D uses proximity in the functional latent space to quantify uncertainty in affordance inference and selectively triggers affordance discovery. We evaluate A4D across several planning tasks involving diverse and unseen affordances. A4D achieves 94% inference accuracy on existing affordances outperforming state-of-the-art approaches by over 15% points, improves new-affordance inference accuracy from 70% to over 90% with fewer than 10% of the original training data, and enables 100x faster inference. Code, videos, and data available at: https://A4Dance-reasoning.github.io.

Planning for real-world problems by language models often involves both world and user constraints, which may not be fully specified upfront and are progressively disclosed through interaction. However, existing benchmarks still underexplore adaptive planning under such progressively revealed dual constraints. To address this gap, we introduce AdaPlanBench, a dynamic interactive benchmark for evaluating whether Large Language Model (LLM) agents can adaptively plan and re-plan under progressively revealed world and user constraints. AdaPlanBench is built on 307 household tasks, with a scalable constraint construction pipeline that augments each task with dual constraints. At runtime, agents interact with the environment in a multi-turn protocol where hidden constraints are revealed only when the agent proposes a plan that violates them, requiring iterative plan revision under accumulating feedback. This makes planning challenging, as agents must infer and track constraints from feedback while re-planning effectively. Experiments on ten leading LLMs show that adaptive planning under dual constraints remains challenging, with the best model reaching only 67.75% accuracy. We further observe that performance degrades as more constraints accumulate, with user constraints posing a particularly large challenge and failures often stemming from weaker physical grounding and reduced effectiveness. These results establish AdaPlanBench as a testbed for dual-constrained interactive planning and highlight the challenge of reliable adaptation to dynamically revealed constraints in LLM agents.

Physical-world interaction is inherently dynamic, as environments can evolve during execution, requiring agents to adapt their plans under non-stationary conditions. We study this challenge through long-horizon embodied planning under environment deviations and execution uncertainty. Existing embodied-task benchmarks can expose such failures, but these failures are usually treated as evaluation outcomes instead of learnable signals for training agents to recover. In this work, we introduce DynamicEnvPlan, a closed-loop framework for high-level planning in dynamic environments. It extends embodied task execution with humanoid agents, high-level primitive skills, structured semantic memory, and controllable perturbations. Our data synthesis design consists of planning, perturbation, and guarded correction modules that turn dynamic execution states into recovery-oriented traces. The resulting traces are used for staged supervised fine-tuning, enabling the planner to learn from both nominal execution and perturbed recovery trajectories. Using 104 task-scene combinations spanning i.i.d., compositional generalization, and out-of-distribution settings for fine-tuning and evaluation, DynamicEnvPlan boosts success rate from 33.3% for the base planner to 76.2%, while improving across all seven evaluation metrics critical to physical-world interaction, including safety and affordance compliance.