OmniRobotHome: A Multi-Camera Home Platform for Real-Time Human-Robot Interaction

Occupancy prediction at voxel-level granularity is essential for safe robotic navigation and interaction in complex environments. Existing occupancy datasets, however, are predominantly designed for autonomous driving with vehicle-centric biases -- forward-facing cameras, far-field geometry, and static road priors -- limiting their applicability to embodied humanoid perception. We present Humanoid-OmniOcc, a large-scale panoramic stereo-based occupancy dataset tailored for humanoid robots. The dataset encompasses 15 diverse simulated indoor scenes and 5 real-world environments, yielding over 155K samples with broad scene and style diversity. Importantly, the dataset is designed around a Real2Sim2Real closed-loop paradigm: real sensor specifications drive physically accurate simulation, simulation produces large-scale annotated training data, and models trained in simulation are directly evaluated on real-world captures -- enabling iterative refinement of the sim-to-real pipeline. We further propose \textbf{H}umanoid \textbf{S}urround \textbf{S}tereo-guided \textbf{Occ}upancy model (Humanoid-OmniOcc) that exploits robust depth priors for accurate 2D-to-3D lifting. Extensive experiments show that Humanoid-OmniOcc consistently outperforms monocular baselines and generalizes well to both unseen simulated test scenes and real-world environments, validating the effectiveness of the Real2Sim2Real design. Code and data will be available upon acceptance at https://d-robotics-ai-lab.github.io/humanoid-omniocc.

Anticipating whether a person will interact from one's own perspective is a highly intuitive task for humans, that relies on a combination of cues. We investigate how humans perform at predicting a person's intention to interact from a service robot's point of view, using pose-only or full video input, then benchmark different lightweight pose-based models and state-of-the-art vision-language models. We conducted our benchmark on the HUI360 dataset on a fixed pilot subset of 100 test tracks (25 positive, 75 negative). We found that with pose-only input, human annotators outperform lightweight trained pose models but not by large margins (+0.08 in F1-Score). But when given full egocentric video with a target bounding box, human annotators perform substantially better and largely outperform the Vision-Language Models (+0.2 in F1-Score). We also compared VLMs of different size and under different input conditions, and found that the best results do not correlate with model size. Our result confirms that predicting interactions is a challenging task for social robots and that reasoning-capable models are necessary but their actual reasoning capabilities alone do not suffice to match the social intuition of humans.

Humanoid motion tracking is central to teleoperation and whole-body imitation, yet evaluation often disagrees with what people perceive in videos. Kinematic errors average per-frame pose differences but miss the physical artifacts that matter most, particularly unstable support and incorrect contacts such as foot skating and mistimed touch-downs. Meanwhile, widely used test suites are small and lack the diversity needed to stress contact-rich, long-horizon behaviors. We introduce HumanTracker to make humanoid tracking evaluation both perceptually aligned and scalable. The HumanTracker benchmark contains approximately 153 hours of optical motion trajectories from multiple professional performers, organized into four motion families with text labels for fine-grained diagnosis. We further propose HumanScore, a preference-aligned metric trained on 12K motion pairs containing 24K motions. Across representative state-of-the-art trackers, HumanScore better predicts human preferences and reveals contact and stability failures that kinematic metrics often miss.