The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) is reshaping smart manufacturing by providing new capabilities for efficiency, adaptability, and autonomy across industrial value chains. However, the deployment of AI and ML in industrial settings still faces critical challenges, including the complexity of industrial big data, effective data management, integration with heterogeneous sensing and control systems, and the demand for trustworthy, explainable, and reliable operation in high-stakes industrial environments. In this roadmap, we present a comprehensive perspective on the foundations, applications, and emerging directions of AI and ML in smart manufacturing. It is structured in three parts. The first highlights the foundations and trends that frame the evolution of AI in smart manufacturing. The second focuses on key topics where AI is already enabling advances, including industrial big data analytics, advanced sensing and perception, autonomous systems, additive and laser-based manufacturing, digital twins, robotics, supply chain and logistics optimization, and sustainable manufacturing. The third section explores non-traditional ML approaches that are opening new frontiers, such as physics-informed AI, generative AI, semantic AI, advanced digital twins, explainable AI, RAMS, data-centric metrology, LLMs, and foundation models for highly connected and complex manufacturing systems. By identifying both opportunities and remaining barriers across these areas, this roadmap outlines the advances needed in methods, integration strategies, and industrial adoption. We hope this roadmap will serve as a guide for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to accelerate innovation, align academic and industrial priorities, and ensure that AI-driven smart manufacturing delivers reliable, sustainable, and scalable impact for the future of manufacturing ecosystems.
Large language models (LLMs) are enabling agents to move beyond predefined workflows toward autonomous planning and execution, creating new opportunities for smart manufacturing. However, dynamic environments, complex physical constraints, and stringent reliability requirements hinder the direct deployment of general-purpose agents in smart manufacturing. This article presents a systematic overview of LLM-driven industrial agents. First, we analyze five key challenges and discuss the concept and core characteristics of industrial agents. We then establish a unified taxonomy covering application scenarios, embodiment forms, and five capability levels. Next, we propose a four-layer system architecture and detail its core modules and operational mechanisms for closed-loop task execution. Finally, we review representative applications across the industrial lifecycle and outline future research directions. This article provides a structured reference for the design, development, and application of industrial agents.
Lei Ren, Haiteng Wang, Shixiang Li +7
School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China · School of Software, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China +2
The fast pace of modern AI is rapidly transforming traditional industrial systems into vast, intelligent and potentially unmanned autonomous operational environments driven by AI-based solutions. These solutions leverage various forms of machine learning, reinforcement learning, and generative AI. The introduction of such smart capabilities has pushed the envelope in multiple industrial domains, enabling predictive maintenance, optimized performance, and streamlined workflows. These solutions are often deployed across the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and supported by the Edge-Fog-Cloud computing continuum to enable urgent (i.e., real-time or near real-time) decision-making. Despite the current trend of aggressively adopting these smart industrial solutions to increase profit, quality, and efficiency, large-scale integration and deployment also bring serious hazards that if ignored can undermine the benefits of smart industries. These hazards include unforeseen interoperability side-effects and heightened vulnerability to cyber threats, particularly in environments operating with a plethora of heterogeneous IIoT systems. The goal of this study is to shed light on the potential consequences of industrial smartness, with a particular focus on security implications, including vulnerabilities, side effects, and cyber threats. We distinguish software-level downsides stemming from both traditional AI solutions and generative AI from those originating in the infrastructure layer, namely IIoT and the Edge-Cloud continuum. At each level, we investigate potential vulnerabilities, cyber threats, and unintended side effects. As industries continue to become smarter, understanding and addressing these downsides will be crucial to ensure secure and sustainable development of smart industrial systems.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas (UNT) · Versaterm Public Safety Inc., Canada · High Performance Cloud Computing (HPCC) Lab, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas (UNT)
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), Industrial Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems, and advanced robotics is reshaping manufacturing faster than engineering curricula can adapt, widening the gap between the competencies required on the shop floor and those delivered by traditional engineering and technology education. This paper proposes a Workforce Readiness Level (WRL) framework, which adapts the Technology Readiness Level scale into nine progressive competency stages and a four-pillar rubric, digital and AI literacy, cyber-physical systems fluency, human-machine collaboration, and data-driven decision making, aggregated through a composite stage score and a cohort-level workforce-readiness index under a ``no-thin-pillar'' rule. The framework is instantiated at a university smart-manufacturing teaching laboratory and draws on 89 sponsored capstone projects delivered over four semesters, four of which are analyzed in depth. Four pillars jointly span the relevant ABET student outcomes. Across the highlighted cohorts the workforce-readiness index ranged from 5.2 to 6.4, and the no-thin-pillar rule was diagnostically informative in three of the four cases and the binding certification constraint in one, repeatedly surfacing cyber-physical and data-driven-decision gaps concealed behind strong analytics profiles; advancement to the highest stages was gated by industry-embedded experience rather than additional coursework. WRL offers educators, accreditation bodies, and regional workforce systems a common, evidence-based instrument for diagnosing and advancing workforce readiness; future work will calibrate pillar weights and test reliability and predictive validity.
Dalton Ross Smith, Wilburn Whittington, Alejandro Martinez +2
Michael W. Hall School of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA · Innovation, Design, and Engineering Education Laboratory, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA