Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models

These notes introduce the theory of susceptibilities as developed in [arXiv:2504.18274, arXiv:2601.12703] for interpreting neural networks. The susceptibility of an observable $φ$ to a data perturbation is defined as a derivative of a posterior expectation, which by the fluctuation--dissipation theorem equals a posterior covariance. Different choices of $φ$ yield different objects: per-sample losses give the influence matrix (the Bayesian influence function of [arXiv:2509.26544]), while component-localized observables give the structural susceptibility matrix that pairs model components with data patterns. The susceptibility matrix is (up to a factor of $nβ$) the Jacobian of the map from data distributions to structural coordinates; its pseudo-inverse provides a linearized solution to the patterning problem of [arXiv:2601.13548]: finding data perturbations that produce a desired structural change. We motivate the theory from its statistical-mechanical foundations, then give a detailed exposition of susceptibilities, their empirical estimators, and their connection to the geometry of the loss landscape.

Robust linear fits can resist response contamination yet remain too dense or unstable for useful global explanations. We propose penalized distillation, which fits a smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) estimator to a robust initial estimator's empirical fitted surface along a safeguarded coordinate-descent path and evaluates candidate states separately for fidelity, parsimony, perturbation stability, and held-out prediction. The new results attach to the states the algorithm actually computes. Conditional on a fixed uncontaminated design, deterministic bounds transfer response-replacement boundedness from the initial fit to every retained path state. Turning to fixed dimension, we characterize the oracle-support branch by its empirical-Gram projection and influence function, give conditions for covariance-weighted least-squares approximation equivalence, and establish a path-conditional generalized information criterion. By contrast, at large dimension-to-sample ratios the full-coordinate robust fit collapses without warning, and screening restores the construction. Under a sure-screening framework, the robustness bound and the support and selection guarantees transfer to the screened fit. Simulations separate robustness transfer from support recovery, efficiency, and computation across the dimension-to-sample ratio, with p up to 240, and the signal density, which isolates what the sparse stage adds once the screen over-selects. In a duplicate-grouped superconductivity study, the distilled estimator remains predictively stable under prespecified training-response shifts but retains 66.8--68.8 of 81 slopes. Stronger sparsification reduces the model to 12.6--14.0 slopes only at visible fidelity and prediction cost. Distillation therefore preserves predictive stability on these data without substantiating a compact coordinate-level explanation.

There is a precise sense in which drawing causal inferences from observational data is hard, even when identifiability is assumed. In particular, Robins and Ritov (1997) and Robins et al. (2003) showed that causal effects can be discontinuous as a function of the data distribution: two arbitrarily close data distributions might correspond to different causal effects. This is a fact independent of the choice of estimator; however, not all estimators are equally unstable. Our contribution is to surface a second layer of instability that depends on the choice of estimator. We show that many standard point estimates can be read as point summaries of multimodal distributions over the space of structural causal models. As such, estimators can jump discontinuously in the data distribution. This defines a taxonomy of estimators that admits a decision-theoretic reading: stability depends on whether the implicit loss function an estimator optimizes is aligned with the causal effect itself. Specifically, inverse propensity weighted estimators and regression estimators are examples of discontinuous summaries, while explicit posterior means and medians are shown to be continuous.