Reducing Annotation Burden for Femoral Cartilage Segmentation in Knee MRI via Cross-Sequence Transfer Learning
Authors: Francesco Chiumento, Gianluigi Crimi, Elisa Moretta, Rocco Milieri, Alberto Bazzocchi, Giulio Vara, Giacomo Dal Fabbro, Stefano Zaffagnini, +2 more
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate cross-sequence transfer learning for automatic femoral cartilage segmentation, testing bidirectional transfer between dual-echo steady-state (DESS) and sagittal proton density-weighted 3D fast spin-echo (Cube) sequences. Materials and Methods: We optimized a modified 2D U-Net on 507 DESS images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). We then established same-sequence baselines using subject-level cross-validation on a subset of 44 OAI DESS images and 44 Cube images acquired at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. Each subset included 22 non-lesioned and 22 lesioned subjects. Finally, we performed transfer learning across sequences by fine-tuning the pretrained models on the target sequence with increasing training set sizes to study convergence, while keeping validation and test sets fixed. Segmentations were evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). Lesion effects were assessed with two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction. Results: Same-sequence training yielded higher accuracy on DESS than Cube (DSC, 0.900 vs 0.830; P<.001). Cube-to-DESS transfer matched DESS performance (DSC, 0.903±0.032 vs 0.900±0.027), reaching a performance plateau at 9 training subjects. DESS-to-Cube yielded a lower combined DSC (0.802±0.049 vs 0.830±0.042), reaching a plateau at 24 training subjects. Lesions did not affect DESS (P≥.39) but reduced Cube accuracy (DSC, 0.805 vs 0.856; P<.001). Conclusion: Transfer learning across sequences can substantially reduce target-sequence annotation requirements for femoral cartilage segmentation, but performance is direction- and sequence-dependent, and the effects of lesions on segmentation may vary across MRI sequences.
Automatic pancreas segmentation is fundamental to abdominal MRI analysis, yet deep learning models trained on one MRI sequence often fail catastrophically when applied to another-a challenge that has received little systematic investigation. We introduce CrossPan, a multi-institutional benchmark comprising 1,386 3D scans across three routinely acquired sequences (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Out-of-Phase) from eight centers. Our experiments reveal three key findings. First, cross-sequence domain shifts are far more severe than cross-center variability: models achieving Dice scores above 0.85 in-domain collapse to near-zero (<0.02) when transferred across sequences. Second, state-of-the-art domain generalization methods provide negligible benefit under these physics-driven contrast inversions, whereas foundation models like MedSAM2 maintain moderate zero-shot performance through contrast-invariant shape priors. Third, semi-supervised learning offers gains only under stable intensity distributions and becomes unstable on sequences with high intra-organ variability. These results establish cross-sequence generalization-not model architecture or center diversity-as the primary barrier to clinically deployable pancreas MRI segmentation. Dataset and code are available at https://crosspan.netlify.app/.
Deep learning-based medical image segmentation is increasingly used to support clinical diagnosis and develop new treatment strategies. However, model performance remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality annotated data and insufficient generalization across imaging protocols. This limitation is particularly evident in MRI and CT, where models are typically trained on a single acquisition sequence and exhibit reduced robustness when applied to unseen sequences or contrasts. Although data augmentation is widely used to improve general robustness on medical images, its impact on cross-modality generalization has not been quantitatively explored. In this work, we study a targeted set of data augmentation techniques designed to improve cross-modality transfer. We train three spine segmentation models, each on a single-modality/sequence dataset, and evaluate them across seven out-of-distribution datasets (spanning CT and MRI), reflecting a realistic single-sequence training and multi-sequence/contrast/modality deployment scenario. Our results demonstrate substantial performance gains on unseen domains (average Dice gain of 155 %) while preserving in-domain accuracy (average Dice decrease of 0.008 %), including effective transfer between CT and MRI. To mitigate the computational cost typically associated with strong data augmentation, we implement GPU-optimized augmentations that maintain, and even improve, training efficiency by approximately 10 %. We release our approach as an open-source toolbox, enabling seamless integration into commonly used frameworks such as nnUNet and MONAI. These augmentations significantly enhance robustness to heterogeneous clinical imaging scenarios without compromising training speed.
Nathan Molinier, Hendrik Möller, Thomas Dagonneau +6
Purpose: To assess whether breast lesion segmentation can be learned directly from acquired MRI k-space, and whether doing so improves robustness when data are accelerated or noisy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used public breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) datasets with acquired and synthetic k-space, together with a within-dataset synthetic control. We compared four 3D U-Net variants: a hybrid k-space-to-image model, a native k-space model, and magnitude and complex image-space baselines. Models were evaluated under increasing undersampling and added complex Gaussian k-space noise. The primary outcome was patient-level Dice similarity coefficient under cross-validation, with the hybrid model prespecified as the main comparison against the magnitude image-space baseline. Results: At full sampling, the hybrid and image-space models performed similarly. As acceleration increased, the hybrid model retained substantially more segmentation accuracy and significantly outperformed the magnitude image-space baseline across moderate to high undersampling levels. The same pattern was observed when noise was added directly to k-space: the hybrid model degraded more slowly, whereas the image-space baseline failed under heavier noise. This advantage was reproduced in the within-dataset synthetic control. Feature analysis suggested that the k-space stage and image-space stage played complementary roles, with frequency-domain filtering concentrated before image-domain lesion localization. Conclusion: K-space-aware deep learning improves the robustness of breast lesion segmentation under MRI undersampling and k-space noise, while matching image-space methods at full sampling.
Lukas T. Rotkopf, Marco Schlimbach, Julius C. Holzschuh +3