TeamTR: Trust-Region Fine-Tuning for Multi-Agent LLM Coordination

Large language models (LLMs) with a large number of parameters achieve strong performance but are often prohibitively expensive to deploy. Recent work explores using teams of smaller, more efficient LLMs that collectively match or even outperform a single large model. However, jointly updating multiple agents introduces compounding distribution shifts, making coordination and stability during training difficult. We address this by introducing Sequential Agent Tuning (SAT), a coordinator-free training paradigm. SAT represents the team as a factorized policy and employs block-coordinate updates over agents, enabling scalable, decentralized training without a central controller. Specifically, we develop a sequence-aware, on-policy advantage estimator that conditions on the evolving team policy, coupled with per-agent KL trust regions that isolate occupancy drift. Theoretically, this framework provides two critical guarantees. First, it ensures monotonic improvement, stabilizing the training process. Second, it establishes provable plug-and-play invariance: any agent can be upgraded to a stronger model without retraining the rest of the team, with a formal guarantee that the performance bound improves. Empirically, a team of three 4B agents (12B total) trained with SAT surpasses the much larger Qwen3-32B on AIME24/25 benchmarks by 3.9% on average. We validate our plug-and-play theory by swapping in two 8B agents, which boosts the composite score by 10.4%. We provide code and appendix of proof at https://github.com/Yydc/SAT-AAMAS

As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, they must coordinate with others over long horizons in open-ended interactive tasks. Yet existing evaluations rarely test these demands together, instead emphasising single-agent tasks, short interactions, or highly structured multi-agent settings. We introduce $alem$, a JAX-based benchmark for open-ended multi-agent coordination built on Craftax-like dynamics. Alem embeds procedurally generated coordination tasks, soft specialisation, communication, and controllable coordination difficulty into a long-horizon survival world with exploration, crafting, trading, and combat. We evaluate $13$ modern LLMs zero-shot within homogeneous teams, with trained MARL agents as reference points. Current LLM agents remain far from solving alem, averaging only ~6% normalised return, but their failures are not uniform. On the hardest coordination setting, zero-shot Gemini-3.1-Pro-High approaches MARL agents trained for one billion steps, while GPT-5.4-High achieves strong base-task reward but much lower coordination reward. This contrast shows that individual task competence does not imply coordination competence. Ablations show that communication is the largest contributor to coordination, while memory and reasoning help when used to maintain multi-step plans. Overall, our results identify coordination as a distinct bottleneck for frontier LLM agents, separate from single-agent capabilities. Alem makes this bottleneck measurable and provides a controlled testbed for developing agents that communicate, allocate roles, and execute shared plans. Code is available at https://github.com/alem-world/alem-env.

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on a controller to coordinate a pool of heterogeneous models, yet existing controllers are typically limited to one-shot routing: they select a model once and return its output directly. Such routing-only designs provide no mechanism to critique intermediate drafts or support iterative refinement. To address this limitation, we propose a critique-and-routing controller that casts multi-agent coordination as a sequential decision problem. At each turn, the controller evaluates the current draft, decides whether to stop or continue, and, if needed, selects the next agent for further refinement. We formulate this process as a finite-horizon Markov Decision Process (MDP) with explicit agent-utilization constraints, design a composite reward for controller decisions across turns, and optimize the controller via policy gradients under a Lagrangian-relaxed objective. Extensive experiments across multiple heterogeneous multi-agent systems and seven reasoning benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and substantially narrows the gap to the strongest agent, while using it for fewer than 25% of total calls.