Authors: Andrew Lamperski, Debojyoti Biswas, Eric S. Fortune, John Guckenheimer, Kathleen Hoffman, Noah J. Cowan
Organizations: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota · Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University · 3Federated Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology · Department of Mathematics, Cornell University · Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County · Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
Active sensing is traditionally defined as the expenditure of energy, typically in the form of movement, for obtaining information. Here, we propose that the combination of reliance on adaptive sensors, the linkage between movement and sensing, and task-level control inevitably gives rise to the emergence of active sensing movements. In this way, active sensing is not driven by sensory goals, such as minimizing uncertainty about the state, but rather is necessary for task-level control. This hypothesis, that active sensing subserves control, is supported by both empirical data from organisms and mathematical theory. Interestingly, active sensing behaviors often occur in discrete epochs, interspersed with goal-oriented behavior. This suggests that animals switch between two behavioral modes with distinct control policies, an explore' mode in which animals produce dynamic movements to shape sensory feedback, and an exploit' mode in which animals produce slower compensatory movements that are directly related to achieving task goals. This strategy for feedback control that relies on adaptive sensors, active sensing, and mode switching is not commonly used in engineered systems despite being ubiquitous in biology. Engineered systems comprising state-of-the-art sensors, actuators, and mechanical designs can outperform animals with respect to ``cost functions'' such as maximum force generation, precision, and speed. Nevertheless, animals routinely achieve robust, graceful behaviors that are currently unmatched by engineered systems, suggesting that current control systems are insufficient. These insights, expressed in the language of control theory, may be critical for improving robotic sensing and control.
We investigate whether behavior cloning is sufficient to produce active perception in a structured object-finding task. A low-cost robot arm equipped with a wrist-mounted egocentric RGB camera must reposition to center a partially visible plant before triggering a grasp signal, requiring actions that improve future observations. The model predicts joint commands directly from low-resolution RGB images under closed-loop control. We show that low-resolution egocentric vision is sufficient for reliable task completion and that predicting relative joint deltas substantially outperforms absolute joint position prediction in our setting. These results demonstrate that visually grounded active perception can emerge from behavior cloning in a reproducible setting.
Active perception allows autonomous agents to select their viewpoints rather than passively process the viewpoints given to them, enabling them to target where to reduce uncertainty about their environment. Learned systems typically encourage this behavior with hand-designed proxy objectives, such as coverage or curiosity bonuses, that may conflict with the task. In this work, we propose a method to learn emergent active perception (LEAP) without augmentation of the task objective. We formulate the problem of goal-oriented navigation over hazardous terrains with goals that must be discovered visually. We then propose an architecture for navigation policies with active perception, and train them on a terrain curriculum where task pressure alone leads to the emergence of gaze control. Key to this emergence, LEAP works on a gaze-invariant representation that integrates depth images into egocentric belief maps. We validate its performance in held-out evaluation scenarios, where it achieves a 92.7% success rate, compared to 74.2% for scripted or 34.5% for passive perception, and comes within 4.6 points of a privileged oracle. We validate that LEAP navigation policies, unchanged, can be directly applied to steering quadrupedal locomotion policies in physics simulation.
Ü. Bora Gökbakan, Stéphane Caron, Philippe Souères
Vision-based learning from demonstrations has achieved remarkable success in enabling robots to perform manipulation tasks and high-level semantic reasoning, yet it remains insufficient for complex, contact-rich manipulation. While there is broad agreement that tactile sensing improves manipulation, there is no empirical guidance on which tactile sensors are best suited for which manipulation tasks. In this paper, we provide a systematic, task-driven evaluation of tactile sensors for robot manipulation and propose a framework for selecting and evaluating sensors based on manipulation policy performance. Separate manipulation policies are trained for tactile sensors of four distinct modalities: visual, acoustic, magnetic, and resistive, across three tasks: pick-and-place with unknown mass, object reorientation, and plug insertion. For each task, an analysis of how sensor properties such as spatial resolution, shear sensing, and tactile representation, and the inherent material friction affect task performances is done. Rather than tactile sensing being universally beneficial in the same way, our results show that the usefulness of tactile information depends strongly on sensor modality, material properties, and the specific manipulation tasks. All of the tactile sensors, code, data, and hardware setup will be publicly available on the project website.