Vision-language Models for Driver Monitoring Systems: A Driver Activity Description Dataset

Driving Vision-Language-Action Models (Driving VLAs) aim to use language to improve end-to-end planning, but the language-action gap limits this promise. We propose DriveMA, a Driving VLA framework built on verifiable meta-actions, which summarize future ego motion into compact language-domain intentions and can be constructed from expert trajectories with a trajectory-grounded annotation pipeline and can be verified against generated trajectories through rule-based projection. DriveMA exploits this verifiability with action-centric supervised training and a data-efficient turn-level credit assignment reinforcement learning framework, explicitly aligning high-level decisions with low-level trajectory planning through dense rewards and precise credit assignment. DriveMA sets a new state of the art on the Waymo Open Dataset Vision-based E2E Driving, achieving a Rater Feedback Score of 8.060 with a 2B model and further improving it to 8.079 with a 4B model; it also obtains competitive closed-loop planning performance on NAVSIM. These results show that even a simple meta-action interface can achieve state-of-the-art planning when made verifiable and optimized for language-action alignment. Code, data, and models are available at https://tsinghua-mars-lab.github.io/DriveMA.

Driving Vision-Language-Action Models (Driving VLAs) commonly introduce natural-language reasoning as an intermediate interface for end-to-end planning, but reasoning-centric interfaces face three practical bottlenecks: obtaining high-quality reasoning annotations is difficult, generating and understanding long reasoning chains is challenging for compact models, and inference latency is substantially increased. In this paper, we rethink the design of language interfaces in Driving VLAs and show that concise one-step meta-actions are a simple yet effective alternative to verbose reasoning. Meta-actions provide semantic decision grounding while remaining low-entropy, and being automatically derivable from expert trajectories, enabling scalable supervision and reliable trajectory conditioning. Building on this interface, we propose DriveMA, which combines action-centric supervised training with a turn-level credit-assignment reinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes meta-action correctness, trajectory quality, and trajectory--meta-action consistency. Experiments show that DriveMA already achieves a new state of the art on the Waymo End-to-End Driving Challenge with a 2B model, reaching a Rater Feedback Score (RFS) of 8.060, while its 4B version further improves the state of the art to 8.079; DriveMA also obtains competitive performance on NAVSIM. Ablations demonstrate that one-step meta-actions offer a better practical trade-off between expressiveness, predictability, and inference efficiency than natural-language reasoning or finer-grained action sequences. Code, data, and models will be released to facilitate future research.

Reward models play a pivotal role in reinforcement learning (RL) and multi-modal trajectory selection for autonomous driving. However, acquiring such rewards typically relies on hand-crafted rule-based objectives or perception ground truth, which hinders generalization for data-scaling. While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated feasibility as reward models in other domains, their effectiveness in driving tasks remains underexplored. In this work, we bridge this gap by (1) introducing DriveReward, a reasoning trajectory evaluation dataset rigorously labeled via temporally-grounded visual guidance, and augmented with counterfactual driving behaviors., (2) alongside a specialized Vision-Language Reward Model. To address the scarcity of failure cases in conventional datasets, we propose a counterfactual data annotation scheme to construct cases encompassing diverse driving styles and erroneous behaviors. Evaluations on our proposed benchmark reveal that even leading open-source and proprietary VLMs fail to excel across all tasks, highlighting significant room for improvement in existing models. Building on these findings, we subsequently tailor a specialized 1B reward model that outperforms larger VLMs on task-specific reward alignment. Finally, we validate our reward model's effectiveness by integrating it into RL finetuning and multi-modal trajectory scoring across multiple baselines, achieving performance comparable to rule-based reward calculations in both open-loop and closed-loop evaluation.