Gaussian processes with stationary kernels on bounded domains exhibit inflated posterior variance near the boundary. Despite being a long-recognized artifact in geostatistics and a source of over-exploration in Bayesian optimization, the causes and effects of boundary-induced acquisition bias are underexplored. We trace the root cause to a simple geometric mechanism: the truncation of the kernel correlation neighborhood at the domain boundary creates an observation-independent distortion that worsens with dimensionality. We show how this distortion manifests across three acquisition classes: variance maximization concentrates selections at the corners, whereas negative integrated posterior variance and expected predictive information gain move selections inward to axis-aligned interior shells. These patterns arise without reference to any objective function, meaning that acquisition behavior can be dominated by kernel geometry rather than the desired task-specific uncertainty. To quantify this, we introduce a function-free selection-profile diagnostic for arbitrary acquisitions, kernels, and bounded-domain geometries.
In many experimental settings, active learning can improve sample efficiency by sequentially selecting where to measure, which is particularly valuable when experiments are expensive. Gaussian processes with variance-based acquisition criteria are widely used for this purpose, but have two limitations. First, they are observation-independent: their posterior variance depends only on where samples are acquired, not on what is measured, impairing their sensitivity to the structure of the acquired data. Second, they inflate the variance near boundaries, leading to excessive sampling at the edges of the space compared to the interior. These limitations undermine the gains in sampling efficiency expected from sequential acquisition. We address both limitations. We derive a reconstruction-driven design density and use the posterior mean to build a training-free warp that places more measurements where the target function varies rapidly. A geometric equalizer separately corrects boundary bias. Across sixteen synthetic and two real-data benchmarks, the geometric equalizer consistently improves function reconstruction by correcting boundary bias, while the reconstruction warp provides further gains by concentrating measurements where the posterior mean varies rapidly.
Sanna Jarl, Jens Sjölund, Jonathan J. S. Scragg +1
Gaussian Processes (GPs) are widely used as surrogates for black-box functions in sequential decision-making problems such as Bayesian optimization (BO), level set estimation (LSE), and Bayesian active learning (BAL). GP performance critically depends on kernels, and standard kernels can lead to suboptimal decisions under misspecification. To address this, we introduce HACK GPs (Hedge Adaptive Cumulative Kernels), a method that views kernel selection as an online learning with expert advice problem. HACK treats each candidate kernel as a GP "expert" and updates a distribution over experts online using AdaHedge, based on a loss received as a proxy for their ability to fit the function and align with the task objective. We provide two variants of HACK: (i) Mixture of Gaussians (MoG) and (ii) categorical sampling. We establish general guarantees showing that, under a loss-gap condition, the weight concentrates on the best kernel and the resulting acquisition function is close to that of the best expert. Empirically, we observe robust performance across BO, LSE, and BAL compared to standard kernels such as Squared Exponential and Matern-5/2, as well as simple ensemble baselines.
Kavin Aravindan, Mani Tej Sriram, Gautam Dasarathy +1
Preferential Bayesian optimization (PBO) optimizes objectives accessible only through pairwise user comparisons. The standard approach fits a Gaussian process surrogate for observed pairwise comparisons (PairwiseGP) using the Laplace approximation and selects queries with the Expected Utility of Best Option (EUBO) acquisition function. EUBO queries new candidates at each step, producing pairs that share no candidates with previous queries. Each such pair forms an isolated component in the comparison graph, removing one degree of freedom from the likelihood Hessian and making it rank-deficient. This deficiency is structural and cannot be resolved by changing the surrogate modeling approach. Existing approaches to remedy this issue either waste query budget by forcing comparisons to stay connected, or apply uniform regularization that also perturbs directions already well-constrained by the observed comparisons. We propose KappaSharp that enables a diagonal correction to the Hessian to reduce its condition number, with larger corrections where the prior uncertainty is higher. The correction is only applied in the model fitting step, not query selection. An adaptive variant of KappaSharp is also presented that activates the correction only when the surrogate is confident about recent comparisons, avoiding unnecessary corrections when the problem is well-conditioned. On 11 benchmarks (5--20 dimensions), including a 16-dimensional controller tuning problem in plasma medicine, Adaptive KappaSharp outperforms the standard PBO baseline, with up to +10.9% (p=0.003).