Towards Next-Generation Healthcare: A Survey of Medical Embodied AI for Perception, Decision-Making, and Action
Authors: Cheng Zhang, Qing Cai, Xingzheng Wu, Xun Yang, Xiaojun Chang, Bingkun Bao, Liqiang Nie, Xinwang Liu, Yi Yang
Organizations: School of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266100, China · Innovation School of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China · School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China · School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China · College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China · ReLER Laboratory, CCAI, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang 310027, China
Foundation models have demonstrated impressive performance in enhancing healthcare efficiency across a wide range of medical applications. Nevertheless, their limited ability to perceive, understand, and interact with the physical world significantly constrains their effectiveness in real-world clinical workflows, where safety-critical decision-making and physical execution are tightly coupled. Recently, embodied artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising physical-interactive paradigm for intelligent healthcare, enabling agents to operate in complex medical environments. As research in this area rapidly expands, understanding how intelligent agents function as integrated, end-to-end systems in clinical environments becomes increasingly critical. However, existing surveys on medical embodied AI largely emphasize individual aspects or functional components, lacking a unified system-level organization of the field. To support and consolidate recent advances, we systematically survey the core components of medical embodied AI, with a particular emphasis on the coordinated integration of perception, decision-making, and action. We further review representative medical applications and relevant datasets, and we analyze the major challenges encountered in real-world clinical practice. Finally, we discuss key directions for future research in this rapidly evolving field. The associated project can be found at https://github.com/VMVLab/Medical_Embodied_AI_Paper_List.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of a medical embodied artificial intelligence framework. Medical embodied agents interact with simulated and real clinical environments via a perception–decision–action loop.
Fig. 2: Overview structure of this survey.
Fig. 3: Conceptual foundations of embodied AI and its relevance to medical embodied intelligence. a, Publication trends, temporal evolution over the past decade, and representative keywords of embodied AI based on Google Scholar statistics. b, Four developmental stages of embodied AI: conceptual germination, paradigm shift, learning-driven, and large-model–empowered stages. c, Comparison between disembodied intelligence and embodied AI, highlighting the latter’s ability to interact with the environment. d, Core components of embodied AI, including agents and environments at the system level, and embodied perception, decision-making, and action at the technical level.
Components
Function
Sub-Direction
Embodied Perception
Provides multimodal understanding of the environment.
Object Perception
Scene Perception
Behavior Perception
Expression Perception
Embodied Decision-Making
Converts perception into adaptive strategies.
Task Planning
Embodied Navigation
TABLE I: Overview of the core components, their respective functions, and sub-directions in embodied AI.
Fig. 4: Overview of medical embodied AI and its hierarchical organization with representative methods.
Fig. 5: Overview of medical embodied perception, including medical instrument and organ recognition, surgical and clinical environment perception and modeling, medical operation behavior detection, and emotional interaction understanding.
Fig. 6: Overview of medical embodied decision-making, including medical workflow modeling and task planning, medical navigation systems, and clinical question-answering and decision-support mechanisms.
Fig. 7: Overview of medical embodied action, including medical imitation-based action, medical reinforcement-based action, and medical large-model-driven action.
Category
System/Robot
Setting
Core functions
Autonomy
Surgical Robot
da Vinci [ 121 ]
OR
Surgeon-controlled manipulation; improves precision and consistency
Teleop
EMARO [ 122 ]
OR
Endoscope stabilization and positioning; reduces assistant burden
Shared
ROSA [ 123 ]
OR
Image-guided navigation and positioning; improves placement accuracy
Assisted
PRECEYES [ 124 ]
OR
Micron-level manipulation; tremor suppression
Teleop
ROBODOC [ 125 ]
OR
High-precision bone preparation for improved implant fit
Supervised
Symani [ 126 ]
OR
Enhanced micro-scale dexterity and consistency
Teleop
TABLE II: Integrated application systems of medical embodied AI.
Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in open-world, safety-critical environments. As these systems gain autonomy and enter domains such as transportation, healthcare, and industrial or assistive robotics, ensuring their safety becomes both technically challenging and socially indispensable. Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions, where failures can directly lead to physical harm. This survey provides a comprehensive and structured review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline, from perception and cognition to planning, action and interaction, and agentic system. We introduce a multi-level taxonomy that unifies fragmented lines of work and connects embodied-specific safety findings with broader advances in vision, language, and multimodal foundation models. Our review synthesizes insights from over 500 papers spanning adversarial, backdoor, jailbreak, and hardware-level attacks; attack detection, safe training and robust inference; and risk-aware human-agent interaction. This analysis reveals several overlooked challenges, including the fragility of multimodal perception fusion, the instability of planning under jailbreak attacks, and the trustworthiness of human-agent interaction in open-ended scenarios. By organizing the field into a coherent framework and identifying critical research gaps, this survey provides a roadmap for building embodied agents that are not only capable and autonomous but also safe, robust, and reliable in real-world deployment.
Xiao Li, Xiang Zheng, Yifeng Gao +35
Fudan University · City University of Hong Kong · Jilin University +10
As AI agents become increasingly capable of complex, long-horizon reasoning, rigorous and holistic evaluation is essential for measuring progress toward real-world healthcare applications. We introduce HealthAgentBench, a suite of 54 agentic healthcare tasks across 7 categories each with its unique environment. The benchmark suite spans diverse workflows throughout the patient journey and a broad range of modalities. Each task is designed to replicate an end-to-end clinical workflow: given minimal instructions, an agent must explore raw healthcare data, operate within a complex environment, and execute multi-step solutions that go beyond naive prompting. A final task success rate is reported to provide a single, interpretable metric for HealthAgentBench overall performance for each agent. Evaluating frontier agents on HealthAgentBench, we find that overall task success rate remains low, underscoring the difficulty of the suite. The strongest and the most cost effective agent, Codex GPT-5.5, achieves only approximately 42% success rate. Beyond aggregate performance, HealthAgentBench reveals nuanced strengths and weaknesses across task categories. Frontier agents show promise in automatically developing research modeling pipelines over EHR data, but medical imaging remains especially challenging, particularly for Claude Code models, while Codex GPT-5.5 shows emerging capability. Tasks that combine large search spaces with compositional reasoning requirements remain difficult for all current agents. Together, these results suggest that HealthAgentBench provides a challenging and realistic benchmark with substantial room for future progress. We release our benchmark at https://github.com/microsoft/HealthAgentBench.
Multi-modal large language models (MM-LLMs) have shown strong performance in medical image understanding and clinical reasoning. Recent medical agent systems extend them with tool use and multi-agent collaboration, enabling complex decision-making. However, these systems rely almost entirely on frontier models (e.g., GPT), whose API-based deployment incurs high cost, high latency, and privacy risks that conflict with on-premise clinical requirements. We present Meissa, a lightweight 4B-parameter medical MM-LLM that brings agentic capability offline. Instead of imitating static answers, Meissa learns both when to engage external interaction (strategy selection) and how to execute multi-step interaction (strategy execution) by distilling structured trajectories from frontier models. Specifically, we propose: (1) Unified trajectory modeling: trajectories (reasoning and action traces) are represented within a single state-action-observation formalism, allowing one model to generalize across heterogeneous medical environments. (2) Three-tier stratified supervision: the model's own errors trigger progressive escalation from direct reasoning to tool-augmented and multi-agent interaction, explicitly learning difficulty-aware strategy selection. (3) Prospective-retrospective supervision: pairing exploratory forward traces with hindsight-rationalized execution traces enables stable learning of effective interaction policies. Trained on 40K curated trajectories, Meissa matches or exceeds proprietary frontier agents in 10 of 16 evaluation settings across 13 medical benchmarks spanning radiology, pathology, and clinical reasoning. Using over 25x fewer parameters than typical frontier models like Gemini-3, Meissa operates fully offline with 22x lower end-to-end latency compared to API-based deployment. Data, models, and environments are released at https://github.com/Schuture/Meissa.
Yixiong Chen, Xinyi Bai, Yue Pan +2
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA · Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA