On the Identifiability of User Adaptation in Co-Adaptive Neural Interfaces

Recognition accuracy obtained during a recording session does not persist when a user puts on the electrodes again after the electrodes had previously been removed. The electrodes may have moved slightly, the skin may be drier or wetter, or the elbow may be positioned differently; these factors all contribute to day-to-day variability and therefore represent a major obstacle to implementing successful pattern-recognition based myoelectric control systems in daily practice. However, simply recalibrating a user's hand for 20 min at every doff/don event is a clearly unrealistic expectation. A montage-agnostic encoder built for cross-user, cross-montage transfer is trained here using data collected during a particular recording session, and then applied to data collected later in a different recording session without adjusting anything, on the ten intact subjects of NinaPro DB6. The performance of this approach is compared to that of a per-user LDA classification pipeline, and to that of two published approaches that only rely on source data collected from the same recording session. Carried unchanged across recording sessions, the encoder retains 0.688 macro-F1 against 0.540 for the per-user pipeline, and, on the per-window metric the published baselines use, sits above both published source-only results, a band of two points that locates the encoder rather than ranking it. Of five label-free test-time adaptations, only feature-statistic alignment improves every subject; batch-normalisation re-estimation, a standard method in the domain-adaptation literature, collapses this architecture entirely. Aligning the encoder's feature statistics to the new session recovers about what a single labelled calibration repetition would.

Adding a learned adapter to a frozen, command-conditioned locomotion policy is worthwhile only if the interface exposes improvements that are both real and recoverable from deployment-time observations. We introduce an adapter necessity audit that separates global operating-point gain,same-state counterfactual headroom, deployment gain over a cross-fitted fixed action, and state-allocation gain over a frequency-matched randomized policy. Source-cluster learner refits map these quantities and constraint violations to a GO/NO-GO/ABSTAIN decision. Closed-loop command- response identification provides optional decision features. On Go2, an archived scale-prefix diagnostic finds 5.2% same-state headroom but only 0.55% recovered allocation gain. Our confirmatory audit evaluates direct, scale, heading, and yaw interventions on twenty independent clusters for each of three query distributions induced by direct control, VGCC, and MPC, using 200 full learner refits. At 1% deployment and allocation thresholds and a 5% violation tolerance, direct queries return NO-GO, while VGCC and MPC queries ABSTAIN. VGCC has the largest mean deployment gain (1.34%), but its allocation lower bound is 0.09% and its violation upper bound is 6.25%. A deployment-representative twenty-cluster H1 audit also returns NO-GO, whereas a learner-level synthetic control returns GO. The audit therefore tests whether observable signal justifies state-dependent adaptation rather than presuming that an adapter is valuable.

Closed-loop human-AI systems generate high-dimensional behavioural trajectories whose collective dynamics remain obscure. Using 297,915 learners' adaptive-tutoring histories, we define semantic order variables before model fitting and test them in user-disjoint cohorts. The state exhibits reproducible basin-like flow and operationally defined, state-heterogeneous metastable-like kinetics. A construction-matched null distinguishes normalised-memory relaxation from a reproducible excess field. A four-term conditional mechanism recovers population drift (r = 0.946; learner-bootstrap 95% CI, 0.935-0.955). Predictive event-level self-supervised learning recovers the state and learned-plane flow; null-referenced corrections retain directional, partial-amplitude excess-field structure without full calibration. Shuffled-order training reverses learned-plane flow on ordered trajectories; support-alignment randomisation selectively reduces inward transport. Both axes remain linearly accessible without state supervision. Without cross-model fitting, the models share leading population drift (r = 0.866; learner-bootstrap 95% CI, 0.857-0.875) and persistence ordering; residual directions remain model-specific. These results identify an externally anchored leading-order effective field linking empirical dynamics, an interpretable mechanism and neural computation.