Compact Object-Level Representations with Open-Vocabulary Understanding for Indoor Visual Relocalization

Visual localization becomes extremely challenging in planetary-like terrains characterized by low texture, perceptual aliasing, harsh illumination, and sparse, weakly overlapping viewpoints induced by forward rover motion and unconstrained driving directions. Under these conditions, state-of-the-art image-to-image and image-to-map matching pipelines suffer significant performance degradation. In this work, we propose a visual relocalization method that departs from classical correspondence-based pipelines by directly estimating camera poses against a differentiable map representation built with 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS). Our key contribution is a geometry-aware training strategy that combines photometric and geometric losses, where the geometric supervision is provided for the first time by combining multi-view stereo (MVS) and LiDAR depths. We show that this joint optimization produces a 3DGS model that better fits the underlying scene geometry, leading to improved photometric and geometric consistency and more robust, accurate single-image 6-DoF pose estimation. Extensive experiments on data acquired in planetary-analog environments validate the effectiveness of our approach, showing substantial gains in relocalization accuracy under challenging conditions. Code is available at https://github.com/DLR-RM/multimodal-gsplat-relocalization.

Visual localization in complex indoor environments remains a critical challenge for robotics and AR applications. Sequential localization, where pose estimates are refined over time, is important for autonomous agents. However, traditional methods often require storing extensive image databases or point clouds, leading to significant overhead. This paper introduces a novel, lightweight approach to sequential visual localization using 3D scene graphs. Our method represents the environment with a compact scene graph, where nodes represent objects (with coarse meshes) and edges encode spatial relationships. For each image in the localization phase, we extract per-patch semantic features, predicting object identities. Localization is performed within a particle filter framework. Each particle, representing a camera pose, projects the coarse object meshes from the scene graph into the image, assigning object identities to patches based on visibility. The similarity of the per-patch features, in the input image, and object features from the scene graph determines the weight of a particle. Subsequent images are incorporated sequentially, refining the pose estimate. By leveraging a compact scene graph and efficient semantic matching, our method significantly reduces storage while maintaining performance on real-world datasets. The code will be available at https://github.com/DmblnNicole/sg2loc.

We address robot localization in GPS-denied indoor environments by reframing it as a semantic reasoning task rather than a geometric estimation problem. Motivated by how humans localize using object-level cues and labeled maps, we ask whether a vision-language model, given a front camera image, a polar LiDAR scan, and a top-down semantic grid map, can infer the robot pose. We fine-tune Qwen2.5-VL-7B with LoRA and attach a lightweight regression head that predicts continuous pose coordinates (x, y, theta) directly from the final hidden state, bypassing text generation. Training uses a composite position-and-direction loss with curriculum learning on a custom Gazebo dataset of 120,112 samples and 527 scenes. On the in-distribution test set of 18,017 samples, the model achieves 98.23 percent position accuracy, 98.00 percent direction accuracy, 96.75 percent full pose accuracy, a mean position error of 0.11 m, and a mean orientation error of 5.7 degrees at 0.62 s per sample. Position accuracy drops by only 7.2 percentage points on seven unseen object categories, reaching 90.99 percent, supporting semantic spatial reasoning rather than appearance memorization. With incomplete maps, fine-tuning recovers performance to 93.72 percent position accuracy, showing adaptability to stale or partial map information. Two ablations highlight cross-modal complementarity. Without LiDAR, using only camera and map inputs, position accuracy remains 95.06 percent, only 3.2 percentage points below the full system. However, when the camera sees no visible objects in a wall-facing view, LiDAR sustains 92.33 percent position accuracy, compared with 70.74 percent when neither LiDAR nor visible objects are available. This shows that LiDAR becomes the primary localization signal when camera semantics are unavailable and provides a reliable fallback under occlusion or sparse layouts.