Applicability of memorization indicators for early spotting of overfitting while recalibrating sEMG-decoders on low sample sizes

We introduce a straightforward yet effective method to empirically study memorization in deep neural networks for classification tasks. Our approach augments each training sample with auxiliary random labels, which are then predicted by a random label prediction head (RLP-head). RLP-heads can be attached at arbitrary depths of a network, predicting random labels from the corresponding intermediate representation and thereby enabling analysis of how memorization capacity evolves across layers. By interpreting the RLP-head performance as an empirical estimate of Rademacher complexity, we obtain a direct measure of both sample-level memorization and model capacity. We leverage this random label accuracy metric to analyze generalization and overfitting in different models and datasets. Building on this approach, we further propose a novel regularization technique based on the output of the RLP-head, which demonstrably reduces memorization. Interestingly, our experiments reveal that reducing memorization can either improve or impair generalization, depending on the dataset and training setup. These findings challenge the traditional assumption that overfitting is equivalent to memorization and suggest new hypotheses to reconcile these seemingly contradictory results. The source code is available at https://github.com/MarlonBecker/RandomLabelHeads

Reliable long-term decoding of gestures from surface electromyography (EMG) is hindered by signal drift caused by electrode displacement, muscle fatigue, and/or posture changes. Although modern models achieve high intra-session accuracy, their performance often degrades substantially across recording sessions. Existing approaches to mitigate this problem typically rely on large training datasets or computationally intensive pipelines that are unsuitable for energy-efficient wearable devices. We propose a lightweight test-time adaptation framework for EMG decoding. The framework includes three complementary adaptation strategies: (i) causal adaptive batch normalization for online statistical alignment, (ii) Gaussian Mixture Model alignment with experience replay to mitigate forgetting, and (iii) meta-learning for rapid few-shot calibration. We evaluate these methods on the multi-session NinaPro DB6 dataset. All approaches substantially improve inter-session robustness relative to a non-adaptive baseline while maintaining low computational overhead. Replay-regularized statistical alignment provides the most stable adaptation under limited data, while meta-learning achieves the highest accuracy when sparse calibration labels are available. Overall, our self-supervised test-time adaptation methods reach up to 82% inter-session accuracy, significantly improving upon prior approaches while maintaining resource-efficient operation. These results demonstrate that lightweight test-time adaptation can enable robust, long-term EMG decoding for wearable or prosthetic applications.

Recognition accuracy obtained during a recording session does not persist when a user puts on the electrodes again after the electrodes had previously been removed. The electrodes may have moved slightly, the skin may be drier or wetter, or the elbow may be positioned differently; these factors all contribute to day-to-day variability and therefore represent a major obstacle to implementing successful pattern-recognition based myoelectric control systems in daily practice. However, simply recalibrating a user's hand for 20 min at every doff/don event is a clearly unrealistic expectation. A montage-agnostic encoder built for cross-user, cross-montage transfer is trained here using data collected during a particular recording session, and then applied to data collected later in a different recording session without adjusting anything, on the ten intact subjects of NinaPro DB6. The performance of this approach is compared to that of a per-user LDA classification pipeline, and to that of two published approaches that only rely on source data collected from the same recording session. Carried unchanged across recording sessions, the encoder retains 0.688 macro-F1 against 0.540 for the per-user pipeline, and, on the per-window metric the published baselines use, sits above both published source-only results, a band of two points that locates the encoder rather than ranking it. Of five label-free test-time adaptations, only feature-statistic alignment improves every subject; batch-normalisation re-estimation, a standard method in the domain-adaptation literature, collapses this architecture entirely. Aligning the encoder's feature statistics to the new session recovers about what a single labelled calibration repetition would.