Automating Cause-Effect Specification with Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models

Dynamic Master Logic (DML) provides a hierarchical framework for representing system behavior by linking functional objectives to underlying structural elements. However, DML construction typically relies on expert interpretation of technical documentation, limiting scalability for complex systems. This study presents a framework for automated construction of DML models from system descriptions and their representation as Knowledge Graphs (KG-DML), using Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Large Language Models as enabling tools. Building on prior work with small-scale systems, the framework extends automated KG-DML construction and evaluation to substantially larger and more complex systems. Model construction proceeds across the DML hierarchy using targeted retrieval while preserving functional dependencies and explicit logical relationships. The resulting KG-DML supports diagnostic reasoning, safety assessment, upward failure propagation, and downward dependency tracing. A multi-level validation methodology evaluates layer-specific precision and recall, logical gate consistency, and overall structural integrity. Application to the Low-Pressure Coolant Injection system of a decommissioned Boiling Water Reactor demonstrates consistent reconstruction across repeated runs. The results show that automated KG-DML construction can transform technical documentation into executable functional models for diagnostic and reliability analysis.

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate complex tasks by integrating language models with external tools and environments. However, their autonomy poses significant safety risks: agents may execute destructive commands, leak sensitive data, or violate domain constraints. Existing safety approaches face a fundamental tradeoff: hand-crafted rules are interpretable but brittle, with overly conservative rules blocking safe operations (high false positives) while permissive rules miss unsafe behaviors (high false negatives). Neural classifiers lack the interpretability required for safety-critical deployments. We present AutoSpec, a framework that automatically evolves deployed expert-designed safety rules from user safe/unsafe annotations through counterexample-guided inductive synthesis (CEGIS) guided by inductive logic programming (ILP). Starting from the expert rules and a stream of annotated traces, AutoSpec iteratively evaluates rules, mines false-positive and false-negative counterexamples, uses ILP to learn which predicates discriminate them, generates candidate rule edits, and verifies candidates to select the best revision. The key insight is that ILP efficiently identifies predicates that appear frequently in false negatives but rarely in false positives (or vice versa), dramatically pruning the exponential search space of rule edits. This continues until convergence, producing interpretable rules that balance precision and recall. We evaluate AutoSpec on 291 execution traces spanning code execution and embodied agent domains. AutoSpec raises rule F1 to 0.98 and 0.93 across the two domains, achieving up to 94% false positive reduction while maintaining high recall, and converges within 4-5 iterations. The ILP-guided approach achieves up to 4.8x higher F1 than heuristic CEGIS. The learned rules are human-readable, auditable, and generalize to unseen scenarios.

Tacit knowledge plays a central role in human expertise, yet it remains difficult to capture, formalize, and reuse in machine-interpretable form. This challenge is especially relevant in procedural domains, where successful execution depends not only on explicit instructions, but also on implicit assumptions, contextual constraints, embodied skills, and experience-based judgments rarely documented. As a result, current knowledge engineering pipelines struggle to transform tacit and process-centric knowledge into formally specified, machine-interpretable representations that can be queried, validated, reasoned over, and reused. In this paper, we introduce a neuro-symbolic framework that combines Logic-Augmented Generation and an Active-Inference-inspired approach for ontology-grounded Knowledge Graph construction. We evaluate the approach in a knowledge transfer case study in manufacturing, using assembly-like repair procedures from instructional videos as a reproducible proxy domain. Results show that the proposed solution improves completeness and semantic quality, advancing neuro-symbolic knowledge engineering for industrial domains.