Validating Virtual Reality for Studying Multimodal Human-Robot Interaction in Socially Aware Robot Navigation

Ensuring that robot navigation is safe and socially acceptable is crucial for comfortable human-robot interaction in shared environments. However, existing validation methods often rely on a bird's-eye (allocentric) perspective, which fails to capture the subjective first-person experience of pedestrians encountering robots in the real world. In this paper, we address the perceptual gap between allocentric validation and egocentric experience by investigating how different perspectives affect the perceived sociability and disturbance of robot trajectories. Our approach uses an immersive VR environment to evaluate identical robot trajectories across allocentric, egocentric-proximal, and egocentric-distal viewpoints in a user study. We perform this analysis for trajectories generated from two different navigation policies to understand if the observed differences are unique to a single type of trajectory or more generalizable. We further examine whether augmenting a trajectory with a head-nod gesture can bridge the perceptual gap and improve human comfort. Our experiments suggest that trajectories rated as sociable from an allocentric view may be perceived as significantly more disturbing when experienced from a first-person perspective in close proximity. Our results also demonstrate that while passing distance affects perceived disturbance, communicative social signaling, such as a head-nod, can effectively enhance the perceived sociability of the robot's behavior.

Prototyping and evaluating human-robot teaming (HRT) scenarios in the real-world is costly. Virtual simulation of HRT scenarios has been adopted as an alternative to conducting user studies in the real-world to investigate user perceptions, behaviors, and performance during human-robot interactions. The consistency of human behavior between the real and virtual-worlds is integral to the validity of utilizing such virtual experimentation. This paper presents a user study examining the difference in human behavior between an HRT scenario conducted in a virtual vs real environment. We employed mixed-methods to examine team performance and human factors during the HRT. Our quantitative results showed a significant difference in workload between the two modalities. Our qualitative analysis expanded on the quantitative results and found differences in participants' strategy, their mental model of robots, and the type of trust they had for robots between modalities.

Multi-robot navigation in human-shared spaces is inherently interactive: coordinated robot motions influence how nearby entities respond, while those responses provide valuable information for subsequent robot decisions. However, existing methods typically address action-conditioned prediction, multi-robot planning, or online adaptation separately, and therefore lack a unified mechanism for modeling joint robot-entity interactions and adapting future decisions from executed interaction outcomes. To address this gap, we propose TRACER, a bi-directional receding-horizon framework that closes the loop between prediction and adaptation. TRACER evaluates candidate (i.e., alternative feasible future motion plans for the robot team) trajectories using a per-entity probabilistic response model that separates individual-robot effects from non-additive pairwise interactions; after executing the selected trajectory prefix, it updates persistent identity-bound beliefs over latent response modes using the synchronized observed responses. These updated beliefs then guide subsequent candidate evaluation under probabilistic safety and response-aware cost criteria. Experiments show that (i) TRACER more accurately captures non-additive multi-robot interaction effects than a capacity-matched additive predictor, (ii) persistent identity-consistent evidence improves response prediction and downstream replanning, and (iii) the complete TRACER framework improves collision-free completion over an independent-robot baseline on the SocialGym2 multi-robot social-navigation benchmark.