Examining the Difference in Human Behavior Between Virtual and Real-World Human-Robot Teaming

Virtual Reality (VR) offers a flexible and controllable platform for studying human-robot interaction. Prior work has explored VR for socially aware robot navigation. However, whether VR captures the multimodal interaction dynamics observed in real-world human-robot co-navigation remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we present a VR prototype and evaluate its suitability for studying multimodal human-robot interaction (HRI) in socially aware navigation. Specifically, we investigate whether VR preserves the multimodal interaction dynamics observed in real-world human-robot co-navigation. We conducted a within-subjects study (N = 21) in which participants interacted with a PR2 mobile manipulator robot in both a motion capture equipped arena and its virtual replica in an immersive VR environment. Two common co-navigation scenarios were examined : orthogonal crossing and pass-by interactions. Participants evaluated the robot's perceived social awareness and interaction comfort, while trajectory and head-orientation data were analysed to examine behavioral responses during the interaction. Our results show that participants perceive the robot's socially aware navigation similarly in VR and in the real world. Furthermore, VR captures human interaction behaviors in ways consistent with real-world observations. These findings suggest that VR can be a reliable and flexible platform for studying richer multimodal behaviors in social navigation and HRI.

Learning robot manipulation policies from human video demonstrations constitutes a promising avenue for scalable robot learning. However, comparing different human-to-robot (H2R) transfer methods remains challenging, as existing approaches are evaluated under different settings, including differing task suites, scene layouts, object instances, and amounts of robot supervision. To address this challenge, we present H2RBench, a Real2Sim benchmark for evaluating H2R transfer methods. H2RBench provides a standardized protocol built on real human video demonstrations and simulated robot demonstrations, and includes four manipulation tasks spanning diverse interaction requirements. We evaluate multiple representative H2R transfer methods, each adopting a different strategy for bridging the embodiment gap. Using H2RBench, we systematically characterize how each method scales with the amount of human demonstrations, revealing that methods differ substantially in their ability to leverage additional human data. We further show that simulation performance is broadly predictive of real-world robot performance, with an overall Pearson correlation of r = 0.89, Spearman correlation of \r{ho} = 0.85 and Mean Maximum Rank Violation (MMRV) of 0.06 across method-task configurations. These results establish H2RBench as a practical and scalable benchmark for comparative H2R evaluation prior to real-world deployment.

As groups of robots increasingly collaborate with humans, understanding how humans perceive them is critical for designing effective human-robot teams. While prior research examined how humans interpret and evaluate the abilities and intentions of individual agents, social perception of robot teams remains relatively underexplored. Drawing on the competence-warmth framework, we conducted two studies manipulating swarm behaviors in completing a collective search task and measured the social perception of swarm behaviors when human participants are either observers (Study 1) and operators (Study 2). Across both studies, our results show that variations in swarm behaviors consistently influenced participants' perceptions of warmth and competence. Notably, longer broadcast durations increased perceived warmth; larger separation distances increased perceived competence. Interestingly, individual robot speed had no effect on either of the perceptions. Furthermore, our results show that these social perceptions predicted participants' team preferences more strongly than task performance. Participants preferred robot teams that were both warm and competent, not those that completed tasks most quickly. These findings demonstrate that human-robot interaction dynamically shapes social perception, underscoring the importance of integrating both technical and social considerations when designing robot swarms for effective human-robot collaboration.