Data-Efficient Deep Learning: Empirical Guidelines for Training Set Size Estimation in Inertial Sensor Classification
Authors: Ofir Kruzel, Itzik Klien
Organizations: The Autonomous Navigation and Sensor Fusion Lab, the Hatter Department of Marine Technologies, University of Haifa, , Haifa, Israel
Abstract
Deep learning models dependency on large-scale inertial datasets presents a significant bottleneck in inertial sensor-based classification tasks, such as human activity recognition and smartphone location recognition. In these domains, data collection requires massive recording campaigns that are complex, time-consuming, and difficult to scale. Currently, data-driven guidelines for determining the minimum sample size required to reach a desired accuracy level do not exist. To address this gap, this study presents a systematic empirical evaluation of learning curve convergence rates in inertial classification. We introduce a unified framework that analyzes classification performance under both binary and multi-class scenarios, and derive an empirical formula to estimate performance relative to dataset size. Testing across six diverse, real-world datasets totaling 102.7 hours of inertial measurements demonstrates that accuracy follows a consistent logarithmic growth pattern, regardless of task complexity. Leveraging this finding, we propose a quantitative stability point metric, defined as the sample size required for the learning curve to stabilize within a predefined mean absolute percentage deviation of its asymptotic maximum. Our analysis reveals that models often reach practical stability with substantially fewer samples than traditional heuristics suggest. Ultimately, we offer a generalizable framework to extrapolate total data requirements from small-scale pilot studies, optimizing the tradeoff between recording effort and model reliability. These findings shift the prevailing paradigm from maximizing data volume toward optimizing data efficiency, offering concrete, data-backed guidelines for planning recording campaigns in inertial sensing applications.
The energy-based method remains a comparatively underexamined approach for surface classification in mobile robotics, despite promising results in constrained environments. This study evaluated the viability of using energy-derived features as either a standalone classification modality or as supplementary input to inertial data. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted across three publicly available datasets, comparing the performance of modern deep learning architectures including recurrent neural networks, convolutional neural networks, encoder-only transformers, and Mamba state-space models, under automated hyperparameter tuning and input sequence length optimization. The models achieved higher accuracy than previously reported values on all evaluated datasets, with the convolutional neural network yielding the highest overall performance. When relying exclusively on energy-based features, the models attained classification accuracies in the range of 85-90%, approximately 5-10% lower than those achieved when combined with inertial features (96-99%). Augmenting inertial data with energy features resulted in a consistent mean accuracy improvement of 1-2%. These findings indicate that classifiers relying solely on energy features offer sufficient accuracy for standalone deployment, while also providing a consistent gain when used in combination with other sensing modalities.
This work investigates the ``small-vs-large gap'', where repeating on fewer samples can lead to compute saving during training compared to using a larger dataset. This is observed across algorithmic tasks, architectures and optimizers and cannot be explained using prior theory. We argue that the speedup comes from appropriate layer-wise growth enabled by sampling biases, which is more pronounced when the dataset size is smaller. We provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from various interventions. Our results suggest that using a smaller dataset with more repetitions is not just a fallback strategy under data scarcity, but can be proactively leveraged as a favorable inductive biases for optimization, particularly in reasoning tasks.
Wearable motion sensing provides a continuous and scalable window into human behavior and health, making it a natural fit for foundation models, yet its pretraining and scaling principles remain poorly understood. Prior work studies isolated design choices, such as sensor placement or sampling frequency, often under fixed settings and narrow downstream tasks that fail to capture real-world sensing diversity. We introduce Inertia-1, a fully open exploration of wearable motion foundation models. Using massive corpora of accelerometer data from global sources spanning more than 18.2M hours, we build a controlled framework for studying the full lifecycle of wearable motion foundation models, covering data choices such as sensor modality, device placement, sampling rate, window length; model choices such as architectures and model size; and training choices such as pretraining objective and data scale. Extensive evaluations across 15 datasets spanning human activity recognition, freezing-of-gait detection, and disease prediction reveal intriguing findings for building motion foundation models that generalize across tasks and sensing conditions. Collectively, Inertia-1 not only presents state-of-the-art recipes for diverse downstream tasks, but also serves as a comprehensive, practical, and open cookbook for wearable motion representation learning.