Vision-language-action (VLA) models route driving decisions through a deep language model, but it is unclear how much of that depth the action itself requires. We study a representative driving VLA whose entire plan is carried by a single planning token that a generative planner decodes into a trajectory. Borrowing the planner as a trajectory-space logit lens, we decode the planning token from every one of the 32 decoder layers and measure two signals: the linear decodability of the navigation command and trajectory compatibility with the frozen native planner. Our diagnostic shows that semantic intent is linearly decodable early: command-probe accuracy reaches 97.7% after the first decoder layer, compared with 16.7% chance. In contrast, compatibility with the frozen native planner improves gradually across depth, with open-loop Avg-L2 reaching its minimum of 2.11,m only at the final layer. Learned readouts from the first layer recover much of this gap, indicating that planning information is already present early but is not yet represented in the format expected by the deployed planner. Ranking decoder layers by the angular deviation they induce in the planning token permits removal of 8 of 32 layers within an approximately 5% relative open-loop error increase and yields a measured 1.33× decoder speedup. At the evaluated sample size, no family-specific degradation is statistically resolved. These findings are limited to the evaluated ORION checkpoint and Bench2Drive setup.
Modern Vision-Language-Action (VLA) planners for autonomous driving emit a chain-of-causation (CoC) reasoning step \emph{before} producing a trajectory. The reasoning is autoregressive and dominates inference latency, while the trajectory head is parallel and cheap. Latency is an operational constraint in autonomous driving, so accelerating the reasoning step is the central problem we address. We observe that CoC reasoning has two qualitatively different needs: most tokens continue routine setup that follows naturally from the ego-trajectory history, and a small fraction encode commitments that require fresh visual evidence about an unexpected situation. We split this reasoning into two specialized paths: a \emph{routine reasoner} that handles the predictable continuation by attending to trajectory history, and a \emph{deliberative reasoner} (the unmodified VLA target) that handles novel cases by attending to current visual evidence, using the speculative decoding framework as the architectural template for how the two paths cooperate. Unlike standard speculative decoding, our routine reasoner is not a smaller replica of the target; the two reasoners are deliberately specialized to read different parts of the prompt. We propose two techniques to realize this. First, we introduce \textbf{FlatRoPE}, a 1D rotary positional embedding in the draft that breaks the rotational symmetry of the target's 3D M-RoPE, redirecting attention away from visual tokens and onto trajectory-history tokens. Second, we introduce \textbf{Action-aware RL (AARL)}, a post-training stage that uses an action-quality reward together with a static-reference KL anchor. Together, our two-reasoner system reduces the reasoning-step running time by approximately 4× relative to the original Alpamayo planner.
Driving Vision-Language-Action Models (Driving VLAs) aim to use language to improve end-to-end planning, but the language-action gap limits this promise. We propose DriveMA, a Driving VLA framework built on verifiable meta-actions, which summarize future ego motion into compact language-domain intentions and can be constructed from expert trajectories with a trajectory-grounded annotation pipeline and can be verified against generated trajectories through rule-based projection. DriveMA exploits this verifiability with action-centric supervised training and a data-efficient turn-level credit assignment reinforcement learning framework, explicitly aligning high-level decisions with low-level trajectory planning through dense rewards and precise credit assignment. DriveMA sets a new state of the art on the Waymo Open Dataset Vision-based E2E Driving, achieving a Rater Feedback Score of 8.060 with a 2B model and further improving it to 8.079 with a 4B model; it also obtains competitive closed-loop planning performance on NAVSIM. These results show that even a simple meta-action interface can achieve state-of-the-art planning when made verifiable and optimized for language-action alignment. Code, data, and models are available at https://tsinghua-mars-lab.github.io/DriveMA.
Autonomous driving planning requires translating navigation intent, traffic rules, dynamic interactions, and language instructions into executable continuous trajectories. Vision-Language-Action models have been introduced into driving planning to improve long-tail generalization, commonsense reasoning, high-level semantic understanding, and explainability. However, existing VLA planners mainly follow planning-head-based trajectory prediction or full-trajectory autoregressive generation. The former only weakly constrains continuous trajectory generation with VLA reasoning, while the latter relies on long sequences of low-information-density coordinate tokens, making semantic-action alignment difficult and leading to discretization errors and inefficient inference. To address these limitations, we propose AnchorVLA, a hierarchical decision-anchored VLA planning framework that uses trajectory-pattern anchors as an explicit interface between high-level VLA reasoning and continuous trajectory execution. Specifically, Decision-as-Anchor Representation represents behavior-level driving decisions with anchor tokens, each encoding an entire local motion pattern rather than a single coordinate point. Decision-Anchored Residual Flow then generates fine-grained continuous trajectories in the selected anchor-defined residual space, capturing multi-modal execution refinements after high-level decision making. By reasoning over compact and semantically meaningful anchors instead of autoregressively generating waypoint sequences, AnchorVLA preserves LLM-based decision making while improving inference efficiency, semantic-action alignment, and continuous generation flexibility. Experiments on the Bench2Drive closed-loop benchmark show that AnchorVLA achieves a state-of-the-art Success Rate of 77.28 and a competitive Driving Score of 89.92.