A Theoretical Framework for Parallel Lifelong MAPF Using Group Decentralized Planning

Lifelong Multi-Agent Path Finding (LMAPF) requires generating collision-free paths for large agent fleets under strict real-time constraints. Reactive frameworks such as PIBT and Enhanced PIBT (EPIBT) scale effortlessly to thousands of agents through rule-based, step-by-step coordination but suffer from severe temporal myopia, making them ineffective in scenarios where long-horizon reasoning is essential. RHCR plans windowed paths over multi-step horizons but incurs substantial planning overheads that hinder scalability. TP tackles both challenges by planning only subsets of agents at each timestep, yet its applicability is restricted to highly structured maps. To achieve long-horizon planning at scale across general maps, we propose Path Updates over Staggered Horizons (PUSH), a LMAPF planner capable of coordinating thousands of agents in under a second while planning over multi-step horizons. PUSH combines the key advantages of PIBT, RHCR, and TP. Like TP, PUSH reduces computational complexity by planning only a subset of agents at each timestep using staggered planning windows. Unlike TP, however, PUSH plans RHCR-style windowed paths in general maps without relying on restrictive map assumptions. To maintain high throughput in congested environments, PUSH further integrates EPIBT-inspired priority inheritance, backtracking, and anytime improvements into its windowed planning. Empirical evaluations across two realistic MAPF scenarios requiring long-horizon reasoning show that PUSH scales to the same massive agent loads as EPIBT (e.g., 10k agents) while achieving significantly higher system throughput than all baselines.

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) requires collision-free trajectories for multiple agents on a shared graph, often with the objective of minimizing the sum-of-costs (SOC). Many optimal and bounded-suboptimal solvers rely on time-expanded models and centralized conflict resolution, which limits scalability in large or dense instances. We propose a hybrid prioritized framework that separates geometric planning from execution-time conflict resolution. In the first stage, Geometric Conflict Preemption (GCP) plans agents sequentially with A* on the original graph while inflating costs for transitions entering vertices used by higher-priority paths, encouraging spatial detours without explicit time reasoning. In the second stage, a Decentralized Local Controller (DLC) executes the geometric paths using per-vertex FIFO authorization queues and inserts wait actions to avoid vertex and edge-swap conflicts. Experiments on standard benchmark maps with up to 1000 agents show that the method scales with an near-linear runtime trend and attains a 100% success rate on instances satisfying the geometric feasibility assumption. Page of the project: https://sites.google.com/unizar.es/multi-agent-path-finding/home

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of planning conflict-free paths for multiple agents in a shared space, each from its start to its goal. Classical MAPF has been the dominant formulation for many years, with its assumptions of discrete time and graph-based conflicts presumably easing the search for solutions. These assumptions limit the physical environments and agents for which a solution is truly collision-free, and also place an upper bound on solution quality that no algorithmic improvements can lift. This work investigates how much solution quality, and in what contexts, the classical MAPF formulation forfeits. Continuous-time MAPF (MAPF$_R$) relaxes these assumptions, making it a natural counter-formulation to compare against across various agent counts and sizes, and graph connectedness, topologies, and resolutions. We find that continuous time and agent shape consideration are worth relatively little on their own; their value comes from enabling an expanded range of move actions, on average improving solution quality by at least $5\%$ on narrow and constrained maps and $17\%$ on maps with open spaces. In some cases, the improvements exceed $20\%$. Doubling the map resolution with classical MAPF recovers less than $3\%$, meaning that little of what is forfeited can be bought back through more compute. This work therefore provides insight on when classical MAPF is a reasonable simplification, and when MAPF$_R$ unlocks significantly higher-quality solutions.