Organizations: Research Center for Intelligent Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, CAS, Beijing 100190, China. · School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. · Dong Feng Off-Road Vehicle Co., Ltd, Shiyan 442000, China.
Airborne torque reaction cannot recover takeoff errors beyond the wheel angular-momentum budget. DART-S applies ramp-face suspension preconditioning to change pitch, pitch rate, and wheel spin before liftoff, thereby shifting the queried state and altering the remaining authority budget. To predict how each suspension action reshapes this state-budget pair, DART-S employs a local calibration map. A support-aware selector combines the predicted shift with local outcome evidence and an interval-reachability screen; an exact-pair audit reports residual authority. Across 600 new runs in 72 independent BeamNG sessions, every positive, negative, and boundary query follows its prespecified branch. At the confirmed 40°/13 m/s boundary, DART-S attains 24/24 post-touchdown attitude-criterion successes versus 0/24 for DART (session-level Holm-adjusted p=0.0234). At 11.5 m/s, a 0.35 s timing action attains 23/24 versus 0/24 for the static preset (p=0.0156). The 200 rad/s command guard keeps drivetrain hard-limit exceedance at zero across all 600 runs. The source code will be available at https://github.com/MeridianCAS/DART-S
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: DART-S overview. (a) Phase structure: during the approach (P0) the selector latches a per-condition decision (deploy the preset, abort, or remain neutral) early enough that the preset completes before the ramp fillet; DART’s pitch-axis torque-reaction law corrects the airborne phase (P1) and landing metrics latch at first contact (P2). (b) Support-aware selector: calibrated attitude and wheel-spin shifts are evaluated by an operational interval-reachability screen. Local calibration support, outcome evidence, and that screen govern deployment; the exact-pair set reports residual authority diagnostically.
Fig. 2: DART-S platform and test conditions. (a) DART-S full-scale 4WIDS platform; orange overlays identify the series-hydraulic suspension elements and cyan arrows show the body frame. (b) Representative geometry and disturbance classes: calibration, boundary, and washboard tests use tabletop-fillet ramps; convex R=35/22 m exit lips are separate mechanism and held-out conditions. Terrain profiles are schematic and not to scale; orange circles and green squares denote takeoff and touchdown.
Fig. 3: Action-minus-neutral landing-pitch difference vs. ramp angle at v=13 m/s ( N≥30 per condition) for the suspension presets and torque-bias baseline. Open markers: not significant ( p≥0.05 ).
Fig. 4: Speed-dependent response on the 35 ∘ tabletop fillet (30 pairs per speed). Positive static-pitch authority persists through the shaded 11.5–12 m/s landing-response reversal, motivating timing-conditioned action selection.
test
protocol
measured result and interpretation
static authority
full lift/drop; front-up/rear-down
ride height changes by +8.3 and -6.3 cm; static pitch is +3.5 ∘ /-3.6 ∘
+7.0 ∘ versus +7.4 ∘ at 20 ∘ ; +8.6 ∘ versus +13.0 ∘ at 35 ∘
platform robustness
mass ± 20%; CoG-forward, N=30
Δland between +6.5 ∘ and +7.5 ∘ (all p<10−4 ), versus +7.4 ∘ nominal
landing-gain stroke scaling
33/50/67 mm (10/15/20%)
Δland = +2.8 ∘ /+7.4 ∘ /+8.2 ∘
landing-end variants
N=30
pitch change at most 0.6 ∘ ; peak-deceleration change within ± 4.8% (not an equivalence test)
TABLE I: Compact validation summary for actuator authority, ablations, robustness, and selector execution. Δland ( ∘ ) is reported relative to neutral.
Fig. 5: Boundary confirmation across independent BeamNG sessions (post-touchdown attitude-criterion successes out of 24; Wilson 95% intervals). (a) At 40 ∘ /13 m/s, DART-S attains 24/24 versus 0/24 for DART. Daggered conditions have large descriptive effects but fail their prespecified speed-match gates. (b) The 35 ∘ /16 m/s factorial yields a positive interaction estimate, but its session-level sign-flip test is not significant ( p=0.0625 ).
Fig. 6: Mechanism measurements. (a) Paired takeoff pitch-rate difference Δωθ0 vs. entry speed on the 20 ∘ kicker (calibration R=35 m, held-out R=22 m); dashed lines mark v∗=gRcosα ; filled markers: sign-test p<0.05 . (b) Overlaid axle-stroke traces at 18 m/s ( R=35 m): the nose-up preset stretches the lift-off window from 0.04 to 0.36 s (shaded).
Traversing crests, ledges, and ditches at high speed often launches vehicles into the air, and a mishandled landing presents a substantial crash hazard. We show that the airborne phase is barely controllable: on a 1383 kg platform the wheel angular-momentum budget caps the recoverable pitch-rate change at roughly 9-13∘/s in the tighter nose-up direction under drive at typical takeoff wheel speeds, and at about twice that in the reverse-inclusive braking direction; driving the wheels to their drivetrain hard limit raises the measured nose-up ceiling to only 16-18∘/s. Takeoff pitch-rate disturbances beyond this directional budget are physically unrecoverable in flight, so the decisive leverage lies before takeoff. DART (Dual-Axis Airborne Reachability-Gated Torque-Reaction) back-propagates the landing constraint into a closed-form certified feasible-takeoff set, which supplies a conservative go/no-go condition and a pre-takeoff speed-shaping law. In flight, DART regulates pitch and roll via steer-resolved wheel-reaction torque, governed by a per-flight roll latch derived from the yaw-coupling analysis. In deterministic full-scale simulation in BeamNG.tech, a calibrated pre-takeoff speed regulator reduces touchdown speed by 36% and raises on-target landings from 0/30 to 30/30. Under the same steep-lip approach the airborne law completes 29/30 safe landings under crash-avoidance bounds versus 0/30 for reaction-wheel-style PD (RW-PD) and time-optimal bang-bang (TOBB). On banked run-ups DART holds the median pitch error at or below 2∘ at every cross-slope, with the largest baseline separation at γ=12∘. Across disturbance regimes, the latch preserves pitch-only allocation on low-disturbance entries and enables dual-axis control when roll becomes binding. All results are from simulation; hardware validation remains open.
Yu Hu, Fangzhou Zhao, Mingyuan Sang +7
Research Center for Intelligent Computing Systems, Institute of Computing Technology, CAS, Beijing 100190, China. · School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. · Dong Feng Off-Road Vehicle Co., Ltd, Shiyan 442000, China.
The high-angle-of-attack flip maneuver of reusable launch vehicles presents significant challenges for robust trajectory optimization due to the combined effects of highly nonlinear dynamics, aerodynamic uncertainties, and actuator saturation. This paper presents a differentiable physics framework for saturation-aware robust trajectory optimization. At its core, a Differentiable Particle Tube Control (DPTC) scheme is developed to optimize uncertainty evolution through an ensemble-based distribution shaping strategy. State uncertainty is represented by a Lagrangian particle ensemble, while hard actuator projection operators are embedded directly into the computational graph, enabling the joint optimization of the nominal feedforward trajectory and a time-varying feedback policy via end-to-end backpropagation. The proposed framework is evaluated against an automatic differentiation-based Successive Convexification (AD-SCvx) baseline combined with a conventional covariance steering feedback strategy. Six-degree-of-freedom Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that, although the baseline achieves nominal fuel-optimal solutions, its unconstrained feedback formulation becomes susceptible to actuator saturation under aerodynamic disturbances, leading to degraded closed-loop robustness. In contrast, the proposed DPTC framework proactively performs a constraint-aware performance trade-off by relaxing spatial tracking to preserve critical control authority. These results demonstrate that integrating differentiable physics with ensemble-based optimization provides an effective and practical framework for robust guidance in highly constrained aerospace flight systems.
Liwei Chen, Tong Qin
Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China
Fully-actuated multirotor aerial vehicles must not only track nominal wrenches but retain the "readiness" to modulate them rapidly under disturbances. Classical effort-minimizing allocators ignore this dynamic limit, whereas maximizing readiness leads to topologically disconnected optimal sheets demanding physically impossible actuator rates. Enforcing a readiness safety floor on fixed-geometry symmetric platforms further encounters a zero-sum degeneracy: motor-speed redistribution cannot improve authority without conceding wrench tracking. This paper uses active morphology to break the degeneracy, treating servo tilt as a geometric resource supplying authority-recovery directions unavailable to static rotors. We construct a configuration-dependent, motor-only readiness certificate - the log-volume of the reachable wrench-rate set - that explicitly excludes servo capacity, preventing a "ghost capacity fallacy" in which the certificate would falsely credit slow mechanical kinematic limits instead of collapsing accurately at motor saturation. The certificate is enforced as a Control Barrier Function (CBF) within a Unified Physical-Command Quadratic Program acting on motor torques and servo setpoints. Closed-loop simulations of an articulated octorotor under severe gust disturbances show classical allocators diverging and uncertified articulated allocators violating the safety floor, while the proposed CBF filter bounds the system state and preserves vehicle authority.
Giuseppe Silano, Martin Saska
Department of Power Generation Technologies and Materials, Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE) S.p.A., 20134 Milan, Italy · Department of Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, 12135 Prague, Czech Republic