Vision Guided Target Conditioned Control for Autonomous Excavation

Repeated excavation continuously reshapes pile geometry, requiring an autonomous excavator to adapt its digging targets and coordinate motion across successive excavation cycles. We present a learning-based framework for continuous autonomous excavation that integrates terrain-aware target selection with reinforcement- and imitation-learning controllers. The framework separates target-conditioned motion from local digging: a shared task-conditioned RL policy controls waypoint-guided approach and loaded transport, while an IL policy learns vision-based digging and lifting from expert demonstrations. Digging targets are selected from LiDAR elevation maps and converted into bucket-tip waypoints for motion control. The control architecture coordinates the learned policies and deterministic unloading through a shared motion interface. The complete system is deployed on a scaled hydraulic excavator with multimodal sensing and closed-loop actuator control. Offline replay and physical experiments demonstrate more consistent target selection, shorter local motion time, and increased payload compared with the respective baselines. The learned digging policy achieves a mean payload of 6.52 kg per completed cycle, compared with 2.68 kg for Fixed Dig. Three five-scoop runs further demonstrate consecutive autonomous excavation under continuously changing pile geometry.

Autonomous excavator control is challenged by coupled kinematics, actuation lag, and uncertainty. We propose imitation learning and adaptive Cartesian tracking (IL-ACT), a novel motion control framework for a 30-ton-class excavator. An anchored, 14-input imitation policy pretrained on operator demonstrations generates nominal joint rates; adaptive Cartesian feedback and gated gain/bias estimation correct these commands before a stopping-distance governor constrains joint-reference generation. Simscape evaluation covers 100 sequential goals and spiral, figure-eight, and rounded-raster tracking, including 88 additional runs across three training seeds, two initializations, and speeds, under hydraulic response and sensing conditions. Compared with Teacher+ACT, IL-ACT completes all goals with shorter duration and lower terminal errors under both response conditions. Telemetry-initialized IL-ACT lowers RMSE in all 24 figure-eight and rounded-raster seed comparisons and lowers additional-load spiral mean RMSE by approximately 29%. Original spiral RMSE also improves over IL-only and PID. Under a shared sensor-noise realization, telemetry-initialized IL-ACT achieves 27.67% lower mean RMSE than Teacher+ACT; enabling estimation reduces mean RMSE by $22.44\%$ relative to the frozen estimator. Pretrained-weight effects remain mixed, and the original teacher comparison exhibits a spiral RMSE--maximum-error tradeoff. Analysis establishes bounded adaptive states and Cartesian feedback, with reference admissibility conditional on governor feasibility.

Earthmoving tasks such as excavation, backfilling, or embankment construction require deliberate repositioning of deformable soil. For these tasks, human operators use all shovel faces, while autonomous systems so far are limited to excavation and dumping. Current methods often rely on heuristic models but do not incorporate soil mechanics. We address this shortcoming by using Reinforcement Learning in a GPU-parallelized Material Point Method particle simulation. Our controllers are conditioned on material state such as shape and compactness, enabling skills that use multiple contact faces of the tool and displace material both inside and outside of the shovel. To use the same learned weights across machines, our policies operate in a normalized end-effector space and are deployed through a calibrated machine interface. We evaluate this calibrated transfer on an 11.5t hydraulic excavator and a 500g tabletop robot. We validate performance through autonomous construction of a 42m long, 2.1m high embankment in 45min, executing 201 individual policy strokes without failure, retry, or operator intervention. In a direct comparison, the autonomous controller matches an expert operator's progression speed and produces a higher, more consistent embankment. Additional qualitative backfilling and compaction experiments demonstrate the material-state awareness and calibrated transfer across machines.