Low-Rank Velocity Fields as a Structural Prior for Unsupervised 4D Medical Image Interpolation
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China · Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China · School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China · Faculty of Computility Microelectronics, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China ·
Abstract
Endpoint-only unsupervised 4D medical image interpolation synthesizes intermediate volumes from sparsely sampled sequences with only the start and end volumes available for training; however, this weakly constrained setting often yields intermediates with unstable boundaries and non-physiological motion, limiting interpretability and downstream analysis. We propose low-rank velocity fields as a structural prior, constraining motion to a structured Tucker low-rank velocity field space that decomposes motion into globally shared spatial bases and a compact sample-specific core, thereby encouraging spatially correlated, anatomy-consistent deformation while suppressing voxel-wise high-frequency artifacts. To capture global coordination and local non-rigid details, we model motion in a coarse-to-fine multi-scale scheme and compose scale-wise deformations at inference to synthesize volumes at arbitrary times. We further provide a theoretical analysis showing that, under Tucker parameterization, low-rank parameters control the smoothness energy of the velocity field, explaining why low-rank modeling promotes smoother motion. Experiments on ACDC and 4D-Lung demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, remaining competitive with methods trained with intermediate-frame supervision, and producing intermediates with improved structural coherence and more stable anatomical contours.
Figures & tables
| Method | Year | ACDC | 4D-Lung | ||||||
| NMI | NMSE | SSIM | NMI | NMSE | SSIM | ||||
| VM | 2019 | 53.54 ±0.37 | 19.18 ±0.34 | 94.68 ±0.10 | 43.98 ±0.36 | 39.02 ±0.60 | 86.06 ±0.29 | ||
| TM | 2022 | 64.63 ±0.67 | 14.43 ±0.62 | 96.64 ±0.12 | 48.95 ±0.10 | 34.96 ±0.40 | 84.78 ±0.12 | ||
| SVIN | 2020 | 60.18 ±0.33 | 9.85 ±0.89 | 97.35 ±0.15 | 43.17 ±0.39 | 30.28 ±2.03 | 85.44 ±0.29 | ||
| UVINet | 2024 | 72.25 ±0.17 | 4.81 ±0.12 | 98.62 ±0.03 | 55.16 ±0.84 | 20.93 ±1.27 | 88.75 ±0.67 | ||
| DDM | 2022 | 64.14 ±1.35 | 10.36 ±0.30 | 97.24 ±0.87 | 42.54 ±0.89 | 33.19 ±0.73 | 85.23 ±0.27 | ||
| NCC | Charb | Reg | NMI | NMSE | SSIM |
| 72.22 | 4.69 | 98.63 | |||
| 72.35 | 4.81 | 98.59 | |||
| 71.45 | 5.18 | 98.49 | |||
| 72.61 | 4.74 | 98.62 |
Medical Image Synthesis
Medical image synthesis creates, translates, reconstructs, and edits clinical images to fill missing data and support analysis.
See all 310 papers