Pass the Bucket: Efficient, Robust, Local Load Balancing for Teams of Heterogeneous Robots

Safe navigation for multi-robot systems requires enforcing safety without sacrificing task efficiency under decentralized decision-making. Existing decentralized methods often assume robot homogeneity, making shared safety requirements non-uniformly interpreted across heterogeneous agents with structurally different dynamics, which could lead to avoidance obligations not physically realizable for some robots and thus cause safety violations or deadlock. In this paper, we propose Capability-Aware Heterogeneous Control Barrier Function (CA-HCBF), a decentralized framework for consistent safety enforcement and capability-aware coordination in heterogeneous robot teams. We derive a canonical second-order control-affine representation that unifies holonomic and nonholonomic robots under acceleration-level control via canonical transformation and backstepping, preserving forward invariance of the safe set while avoiding relative-degree mismatch across heterogeneous dynamics. We further introduce a support-function-based directional capability metric that quantifies each robot's ability to follow its motion intent, deriving a pairwise responsibility allocation that distributes the safety burden proportionally to each robot's motion capability. A feasibility-aware clipping mechanism further constrains the allocation to each agent's physically achievable range, mitigating infeasible constraint assignments common in dense decentralized CBF settings. Simulations with up to 30 heterogeneous robots and a physical multi-robot demonstration show improved safety and task efficiency over baselines, validating real-world applicability across robots with distinct kinematic constraints.

We study dynamic multi-robot task allocation under uncertain task completion, time-window constraints, and incomplete information. Tasks arrive online over a finite horizon and must be completed within specified deadlines, while agents operate from distributed hubs with limited sensing and communication. We model incomplete information through hub-based sensing regions that determine task visibility and a communication graph that governs inter-hub information exchange. Using this framework, we propose Iterative Best Response (IBR), a decentralized policy in which each agent selects the task that maximizes its marginal contribution to the locally observed welfare. We compare IBR against three baselines: Earliest Due Date first (EDD), Hungarian algorithm, and Stochastic Conflict-Based Allocation (SCoBA), on a city-scale package-delivery domain with up to 100 drones and varying task arrival scenarios. Under full and sparse communication, IBR achieves competitive task-completion performance with lower computation time.

Most multi-robot task allocation methods rely on communication to resolve conflicts and reach consistent assignments. In environments with limited bandwidth, degraded infrastructure, or adversarial interference, existing approaches degrade sharply. We introduce a learning-based framework that achieves high-quality task allocation without any robot-to-robot communication. The key idea is that robots coordinate implicitly by predicting teammates' bids: if each robot can anticipate competition for a task, it can adjust its choices accordingly. Our method predicts bid distributions to correct systematic errors in analytical mean-field approximations. While analytical predictions assume idealized conditions (uniform distributions, known bid functions), our learned approach adapts to task clustering and spatial heterogeneity. Inspired by Smart Predict-then-Optimize (SPO), we train predictors end-to-end to minimize Task Allocation Regret rather than prediction error. To scale to large swarms, we develop a mean-field approximation where each robot predicts the distribution of competing bids rather than individual bids, reducing complexity from $O(NT)$ to $O(T)$. We call our approach FORMICA: Field-Oriented Regret-Minimizing Implicit Coordination Algorithm. Experiments show FORMICA substantially outperforms a natural analytical baseline. In scenarios with 16 robots and 64 tasks, our approach improves system reward by 17% and approaches the optimal MILP solution. When deployed on larger scenarios (256 robots, 4096 tasks), the same model improves performance by 7%, demonstrating strong generalization. Training requires only 21 seconds on a laptop, enabling rapid adaptation to new environments.