Failure or Drift? Evaluating Monocular SLAM under Synthetic and Real-World Corruptions

Reliable localization in GPS-denied, visually degraded environments is critical for autonomous UAV opera- tions. This paper presents a systematic comparative evaluation of five V-SLAM systems ORB-SLAM3, DPVO, DROID-SLAM, DUSt3R, and MASt3R spanning classical, deep learning, recurrent, and Vision Transformer (ViT) paradigms. Experiments are conducted on curated sequences from four public benchmarks (TUM RGB-D, EuRoC MAV, UMA-VI, SubT-MRS) and a custom monocular indoor dataset under five controlled degradation conditions (normal, low light, dust haze, motion blur, and combined), with sub-millimeter Vicon ground truth. Results show that ORB-SLAM3 fails critically under severe degradation (62.4% overall TSR; 0% under dense haze), while learning-based methods remain robust: MASt3R achieves the lowest degraded ATE (0.027 m) and DUSt3R the highest tracking success (96.5%). DPVO offers the best efficiency robustness trade-off (18.6 FPS, 3.1 GB GPU memory, 86.1% TSR), making it the preferred choice for memory-constrained embedded platforms. Embedded deployment analysis across NVIDIA Jetson platforms provides actionable guidelines for SLAM selection under SWaP-constrained UAV scenarios.

Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is one of the fundamental problems in robotics, as it enables autonomous operations in real-world scenarios. Under low illumination, reduced contrast, sensor noise, and motion blur degrade both feature extraction and feature matching, while compensating with LiDAR, depth, or thermal sensors raises cost, power draw, and integration complexity. Existing benchmarks remain dominated by well-lit indoor or daylight sequences, leaving open how far SLAM with standard RGB cameras can be pushed in the dark. We benchmark six systems spanning the feature-based, direct, filter-based, and learning-based paradigms - ORB-SLAM3, DSO, Kimera-VIO, OpenVINS, DPVO, and DPV-SLAM - on five LaMARia sequences of varying difficulty and illumination, reporting absolute and relative pose error alongside control-point recall. Kimera-VIO is the only system to track all five sequences to completion, combining the lowest relative pose error with steadily growing absolute error due to the absence of loop closure; DPVO and DPV-SLAM never lose tracking but incur absolute errors of roughly 100 m under low light; and the classical monocular pipelines (ORB-SLAM3, DSO) together with the filter-based OpenVINS fail outright or diverge on most of the harder and low-light sequences. The results suggest that RGB-only SLAM maintains stable low-light tracking only when both inertial fusion and global optimization are present. Closing the remaining gap will likely require low-light-specific learned front-ends or a return to complementary sensing.

Monocular panoramic SLAM benefits from substantial visual overlap under large camera rotations, yet remains prone to errors caused by camera tilt, scale drift, and false loop closures. We show that a frozen panoramic geometry foundation model provides useful internal cues beyond its explicit geometric outputs: intermediate tokens encode gravity in the camera frame, while cross-view attention provides a compatibility cue for potential revisits. Building on these cues, we present HALO-SLAM. A gravity readout enables IMU-free spherical upright canonicalization. For loop closure, we introduce a cost-aware three-stage cascade combining DBoW2 event-level retrieval, attention-based compatibility filtering, and dense geometric validation through symmetric submap augmentation. Accepted revisits yield pixel-aligned 3D--3D correspondences in both local gauges, from which robust $\mathrm{Sim}(3)$ constraints are estimated and jointly optimized with sequential constraints in a global pose graph. Across 125 sequences from five real-world panoramic benchmarks, our method achieves \textbf{100%} sequence success (\textbf{125/125}) under the stated criterion and the lowest ATE among the evaluated methods on all five benchmarks, reducing ATE by \textbf{30--88%} relative to the best ERP-native baseline on each benchmark.