Dual Process Motion Planning

Task planning often suffers from severe efficiency bottlenecks when robots must reason over long-horizon action sequences under complex logical constraints, including object affordances, spatial relationships, and sequential action dependencies. Recent neuro-symbolic methods improve planning efficiency by learning object-importance scores to prune task-irrelevant objects, but they typically rely on fixed offline supervision generated from full search spaces. This creates a train-test mismatch: at deployment, the planner operates in pruned search spaces induced by the model's own imperfect predictions, leading to exposure bias and degraded planning performance. To address this challenge, we formulate object-importance learning for task planning as an imperative learning-based bilevel optimization problem. The upper level optimizes a neural scorer, while the lower level solves a symbolic planning problem in the score-pruned search space. To stabilize this learning process, we introduce a 3R strategy into the lower-level planning, using parallel Repair, Restart, and Rollback recovery to provide reliable and adaptive feedback for upper-level learning. Experiments on three challenging benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, including an 80.04% reduction in failure rate and a 57.14% reduction in planning time. We further validate the framework on a quadruped-based mobile manipulator in simulation and the real world, demonstrating its potential for efficient and deployable neuro-symbolic task planning.

Intelligent agents must reason over both continuous dynamics and discrete representations to generate effective plans in complex environments. Previous studies have shown that symbolic abstractions can emerge from neural effect predictors trained with a robot's unsupervised exploration. However, these methods rely on deterministic symbolic domains, lack mechanisms to verify the generated symbolic plans, and operate only at the abstract level, often failing to capture the continuous dynamics of the environment. To overcome these limitations, we propose a bilevel neuro-symbolic framework in which learned probabilistic symbolic rules generate candidate plans rapidly at the high level, and learned continuous effect models verify these plans and perform forward search when necessary at the low level. Our experiments on multi-object manipulation tasks demonstrate that the proposed bilevel method outperforms symbolic-only approaches, reliably identifying failing plans through verification, and achieves planning performance statistically comparable to continuous forward search while resolving most problems via efficient symbolic reasoning.

Motion planning in dynamic environments is a fundamental problem in robotics, aiming to generate safe and efficient paths, trajectories, or control actions in the presence of moving obstacles, uncertain predictions, and multi-agent interactions. It has broad applications in autonomous driving, service robotics, warehouse logistics, human-robot collaboration, crowd navigation, and multi-robot systems. This survey reviews representative works published primarily between 2015 and 2025, with a particular focus on how recent learning-based advances extend, complement, or interact with classical planning foundations. We first revisit classical planning methods as algorithmic foundations and reference frameworks for learning-based extensions. We then propose a role-of-learning taxonomy that categorizes existing methods according to how learning participates in the planning pipeline, including direct policy learning, learning-augmented classical planning, hybrid planning, and training enhancement methods. For each category, we summarize the main problem settings, representative algorithms, key ideas, integration mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. We further analyze how observation representations, prediction uncertainty, interaction modeling, planner integration, safety constraints, and training strategies shape learning-based motion planning in dynamic environments. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including sim-to-real gap, safe and certifiable planning, dense crowd navigation, perception-planning coupling, and embodied AI.