cs.CVSep 2, 2026

A Specialized Large Multimodal Model for Interpreting PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer

Authors: Haengbok Chung, SunGyu Kim, Joo hyun Lee, Sangjin Bae, Min Jeong Cho, Minseok Suh, Jae Sung Lee

Organizations: Interdisciplinary Program in Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. · Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. · 

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing head and neck cancer using PET/CT is clinically challenging and time-consuming due to the anatomical complexity of the region, motivating computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). Generalist Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) remain limited in medical contexts by insufficient domain-specific knowledge, privacy and security concerns, and verbosity, motivating specialized standalone LMMs. Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility of a specialized LMM for automated PET/CT interpretation in head and neck cancer using a large-scale multi-institutional PET/CT dataset, a tailored training curriculum, and autoregressive training. Methods: LLaVA-NeXT was fine-tuned using a two-level curriculum with image-conversation pairs curated by two radiologists from public data. The dataset included clinically important annotations such as primary tumor presence and metastatic lymph node location. Level 1 used 28,000 image-conversation pairs to learn basic information, including modality type and hypermetabolism. Level 2 used 12,975 pairs to learn primary tumor presence and the existence and anatomical location of cervical lymph node metastases. External validation included four institutions with diverse imaging devices. Results: The specialized LMM substantially outperformed ChatGPT and LLaVA-NeXT. In Level-2 external validation, ROUGE-L, ROUGE-S, Cosine Similarity, Precision, Recall, and F1 were 0.8751, 0.8794, 0.8324, 0.8794, 0.8711, and 0.8751, while generalist models consistently scored below 0.1. Primary tumor classification accuracy was 83.14 +/- 1.15% internally and 69.03 +/- 0.81% externally. For lymph node localization, the corresponding scores were 0.6389, 0.6257, 0.5287, 0.5782, 0.6371, and 0.6648. Conclusion: Specialized LMMs show promising results for fast, accurate PET/CT-based diagnostic support and medical education, highlighting their potential for clinical translation.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables3 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. HEad and neCK TumOR (HECKTOR) 2025: Benchmark of Segmentation, Diagnosis, and Prognosis in Multimodal PET/CT

    Jun 18, 2026Numan Saeed, Salma Hassan, Shahad Hardan +27Cancer Survival PredictionPET/CT Imaging

  2. PET-F2I: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of LLMs for PET/CT Report Impression Generation

    Mar 11, 2026Yuchen Liu, Wenbo Zhang, Liling Peng +6Radiology Report GenerationMedical LLMs

  3. RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning

    Jun 23, 2026Jiasheng Wang, Tanun Jitwatcharakomol, Piyawadee Jongpradubgiat +1PET/CT ImagingMedical Image Segmentation