cs.CVSep 2, 2026

What Does the Encoder Actually Decide? A Controlled Comparison of Vision Backbones on Joint Tree Segmentation and Stereo Depth

Authors: Yida Lin, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang, Sam Schofield, Richard Green

Organizations: Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand · Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand

Abstract

A robot pruning trees needs two facts per pixel: whether it belongs to a tree, and its distance. Both are usually obtained via task heads attached to a vision backbone chosen by reputation rather than measurement. Holding dataset, decoders, losses, schedule, and evaluation fixed, we ask: how much does the encoder choice change joint semantic segmentation and stereo depth on thin vegetation? We build a hard parameter-sharing network with one encoder feeding both branches, swapping only the encoder without downstream retuning. We evaluate [N] encoders across [M] architecture families (CNNs, transformers, hybrids, MLP-mixers, state-space models) near a ~25M budget, trained from scratch. Depth is evaluated on tree pixels only; segmentation uses boundary F1 and background IoU to prevent "label-everything-tree" shortcuts. Three findings stand out. First, the strongest encoders are convolutional and hybrid, not transformers: [BestEncoder] leads with [MIoU] segmentation mIoU and [Delta] depth δ1δ_1, while [X] of [Y] plain vision transformers collapse when trained from scratch. Second, parameter count does not predict quality --- [SmallEncoder] at only [P]M parameters outranks models two orders of magnitude larger. Third, segmentation and depth rankings agree strongly (Spearman ρρ = [RhoValue]), showing no task conflict. Finally, [K] of [N] encoders collapse to degenerate all-tree segmentation --- exposed by boundary F1 but hidden by region IoU.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jun 2, 2026

Beyond Encoder Accumulation: Measuring Encoder Roles in Multi-Encoder VLMs

As foundation models scale toward fusing more heterogeneous visual streams, understanding how diverse encoders interact under joint training becomes a prerequisite for principled design. Yet large vision-language models (LVLMs) currently lack the tools to do so, and parameter-efficient encoder configurations remain hard to identify before training. To re-examine encoder roles under joint training, on the 16-benchmark Cambrian-1 suite we retrain and evaluate all 31 non-empty subsets of five common vision encoders under a unified pipeline (~20k GPU-hours total), and report three findings. First, retraining each subset from scratch reveals encoder rankings that differ from those obtained by masking encoders on a fixed checkpoint, including which encoder ranks first overall. Second, we decompose each encoder's contribution into two axes, Capacity, the score an encoder reaches on its own, and Necessity, the drop when it is removed from the full pool. The two axes are not interchangeable. Pairing the two highest-Capacity encoders is suboptimal, while pairing a high-Capacity anchor with an adaptive complement matches the full five-encoder model. Adding further encoders beyond this pair yields only marginal gains. Third, at fixed parameter count, per-encoder pre-projector effective rank explains the residual score variation. The strongest pairs combine an anchor whose rank survives joint training with a complement whose rank expands under it, suggesting that higher-rank, less-collapsed projector inputs correspond to a more favorable optimization regime at the encoder-projector interface. Together, the Capacity-Necessity decomposition and the pre-projector rank analysis, along with comprehensive evaluation through retraining, expose a methodological gap in multi-encoder LVLM design, and offer concrete primitives for closing it.
Jun 22, 2026

Technical Report for the ICRA 2026 GOOSE 2D Fine-Grained Semantic Segmentation Challenge: Pretraining-Diverse Ensemble of Foundation Vision Encoders for Robust Outdoor Scene Understanding

This report presents our solution for the ICRA 2026 GOOSE 2D Fine-Grained Semantic Segmentation Challenge, which requires parsing unstructured outdoor scenes from four camera platforms into 56 fine-grained categories. Our approach pairs foundation vision encoders (including DINOv3, SigLIP2, and InternImage) with a Mask2Former decoder, and trains them with a strong recipe including long training schedules, exponential moving average, a larger crop size, and multi-scale plus flip test-time augmentation. The three encoders, chosen for their complementary pretraining objectives, are combined into a pretraining-diverse ensemble through per-class validation-IoU weighting. Evaluated on the official GOOSE test set, our submission achieves 75.40% composite mIoU and wins the second place of the challenge. Our study further shows that the encoder's pretraining recipe, rather than its parameter count or the decoder design, is the dominant factor for accuracy on this benchmark.
Aug 5, 2026

Invisible Shortcuts: Why Vision Encoders Know Your Camera

Deep vision models exploit shortcuts, relying on cues that correlate with supervision signals. Prior work has focused on visible biases, such as object-background or texture correlations. We identify a different source of shortcut learning: invisible metadata traces embedded at the pixel level, for metadata such as image processing and photo acquisition. We hypothesize that large-scale semantic supervision, whether through categorical labels (ImageNet) or billion-scale captions (LAION), naturally induces metadata-semantics correlations during pretraining, leading models to convert low-level signals into predictive features. By introducing controlled metadata-semantics correlations, we show that stronger ones produce systematically higher sensitivity to metadata traces and larger performance degradation under metadata distribution shifts. We further explore mitigation strategies applied during and after pretraining that reduce sensitivity not only to targeted metadata but also to unseen ones, without sacrificing performance on downstream tasks. Metadata sensitivity also has a positive side: it partly explains the strong generated-image detection ability of some encoders, while its mitigation can improve out-of-distribution generalization. Code: https://github.com/ryan-caesar-ramos/visual-encoder-traces