BLInD: Learning Driver Intent as a Distribution over Future Ego Trajectories

Existing autonomous-driving world models typically perform dense prediction of future videos, occupancy states, BEV representations, or agent motion. We argue that planning need not reconstruct the complete future world, but only focus on scene features that affect future ego action. Based on this perspective, we propose Auto-JEPA, an action-oriented latent world model that learns continuous future driving intent through joint-embedding prediction. Given visual observations, egomotion history, and navigation commands, Auto-JEPA predicts an intent embedding aligned with the latent representation of the future ego trajectory. The predicted intent retrieves executable trajectories from a fixed trajectory memory, which are then ranked by a scene-conditioned candidate selection module. Auto-JEPA keeps the visual encoder frozen, requires no explicit perception annotations, and uses no learned trajectory generator. By optimizing only task-specific modules for trajectory representation, intent prediction, and candidate selection, Auto-JEPA achieves 91.3 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 and 89.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2. Semantic occlusion experiments show that masking dynamic-agent regions induces an average intent change 2.97x that of equal-area random masking. Moreover, occluding vehicles that affect future driving substantially changes the predicted intent and selected trajectory, whereas both remain essentially unchanged when non-influential vehicles are occluded. These results show that future-intent prediction encourages the model to focus on planning-relevant visual features and supports high-quality planning without dense future-world modeling.

We formalize action emergence as a target capability for end-to-end autonomous driving: the ability to generate physically feasible, semantically appropriate, and safety-compliant actions in arbitrary, long-tail traffic scenes through scene-conditioned reasoning rather than retrieval or interpolation of learned scene-action mappings. We show that previous paradigms cannot deliver action emergence: autoregressive trajectory decoders collapse the inherently multimodal future into a single averaged output, while diffusion and flow-matching generators express multimodality but are not steerable by reasoned intent. We propose Streaming Intent as a concrete way to approach action emergence: a mechanism that makes driving intent (i) semantically streamed through a continuous chain-of-thought that causally derives the intent from scene understanding, and (ii) temporally streamed across clips so that intent commitments remain coherent along the driving horizon. We realize Streaming Intent in a VLA model we call SI (Streaming Intent). SI autoregressively decodes a four-step chain-of-thought and emits an intent token; the decoded intent then drives classifier-free guidance (CFG) on a flow-matching action head, requiring only two denoising steps to generate the final trajectory. On the Waymo End-to-End benchmark, SI achieves competitive aggregate performance, with an RFS score of 7.96 on the validation set and 7.74 on the test set. Beyond aggregate metrics, the model demonstrates -- to our knowledge for the first time in a fully end-to-end VLA -- intent-faithful controllability: for a fixed scene, varying the intent class at inference yields qualitatively distinct yet consistently high-quality plans, arising purely from data-driven learning without any pre-built trajectory bank or hand-coded post-hoc selector.

End-to-end autonomous driving models are typically trained on real-world driving logs, which record only the trajectory actually executed in each scene. This provides limited supervision for learning alternative valid behaviors. Multi-target supervision can mitigate this limitation, but broader trajectory coverage makes safe candidate selection more challenging. We propose FPD-Drive, an end-to-end planner that distills privileged future knowledge into a visual driving policy to improve both multi-trajectory supervision and safety selection. Specifically, we introduce Future-Privileged Multi-Target Distillation to transfer diverse, high-quality trajectory targets from a teacher with access to recorded future observations to the student. These targets extend supervision beyond the single recorded human trajectory. For candidate selection, we further introduce Safety-Aware Score Correction to correct ranking errors between nearby safe and unsafe candidates and raise underestimated safety scores of safe candidates. At deployment, the student requires neither future observations nor teacher inference. Our base model achieves 94.9 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 navtest and 55.9 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2 navhard. The scaled FPD-Drive-Pro improves these scores to 95.5 PDMS and 58.1 EPDMS, respectively, achieving SOTA performance among the compared methods on both benchmarks. Zero-shot closed-loop evaluation on HUGSIM further yields an HD-Score of 45.1 and RC of 55.3.