A Novel Robot-Assisted Learning Pedagogy for Children with ASD
Authors: Laura Boccanfuso, Erin Barney, Marilena Mademtzi, Claire Foster, Quan Wang, Colette Torres, Lisa Chen, Brian Scassellati, +2 more
Organizations: Yale Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA · Now at Van Robotics, Inc. · Yale Social Robotics Lab, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA · Now at Seattle Children's Hospital
Abstract
Interaction paradigms used in robot-assisted autism intervention have historically employed robots as teachers, clinical assistants, or more-abled peers to promote a variety of social skills. These modalities often leverage the expertise of trained practitioners to ensure that child-robot interactions are productive or clinically grounded to yield positive therapeutic benefits for children across the autism spectrum. Yet, despite the fact that the majority of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) attend mainstream schools and spend 80% or more of their time in the general classroom [27], there is a paucity of research incorporating validated classroom teaching pedagogies into robot-assisted autism interventions. In this work, we introduce a novel teaching methodology for advancing social skills in school-aged children with ASD. We evaluate the effectiveness of a novel robot-assisted autism intervention which incorporates the learning-by-teaching pedagogy and explores the comparative benefits of employing a robot versus a human confederate for improved performance on a set of social skills tasks. Results show that 80% of study participants performed better in the robot condition (mean performance in the robot condition=63%, mean performance in the confederate condition=37%), irrespective of the scenario order. Further, 90% of all participants were significantly more engaged in the robot condition (mean engagement: robot=61%, confederate=32%) and, while the effect did not result in the confederate condition, analyses indicate that overall engagement in the robot condition contributed to improved performance. These results suggest that robots employed in a learning-by-teaching context may help enhance engagement and improve performance on a simple social skills task for children with ASD.
Instructing robots from demonstrations can be done through different teaching modalities, each with different usability and performance trade-offs. This paper compares kinesthetic guidance, joystick teleoperation, and hand gestures in a user study with eight participants. We evaluate replay success, modified NASA-TLX workload, and common teaching errors across three manipulation tasks. Kinesthetic guidance produced the shortest demonstrations, lowest workload, and highest success on the more orientation-sensitive and contact-rich tasks. Joystick teleoperation performed best on simple peg picking. Hand-gesture teaching, although less reliable overall, performed better than expected and in some cases achieved results comparable to kinesthetic guidance.
Current agentic robot systems can write executable Code-as-Policy programs, observe feedback, and revise behavior across multiple attempts, but they remain largely task-driven: reusable skills are acquired only after explicit instructions. We study Playful Agentic Robot Learning, where an embodied coding agent uses self-directed play as a continual skill-learning stage before downstream tasks arrive. We introduce RATs, Robotics Agent Teams designed for play-time skill acquisition. During play, RATs proposes novel yet learnable exploratory tasks, plans and executes robot-code policies, verifies intermediate progress, diagnoses failures, retries with dense, step-level feedback, and distills successful executions into a persistent code skill library. At test time, the agent reuses relevant skills from this frozen library to help solve new tasks. Experiments in LIBERO-PRO and MolmoSpaces show that play-learned skills improve held-out downstream tasks over no-play and random-play baselines, with 20.6 and 17.0 percentage-point gains over CaP-Agent0 on LIBERO-PRO and MolmoSpaces, respectively. Moreover, the learned skills can be plugged into other inference-time Code-as-Policy agents by simply retrieving them into the context, improving RoboSuite and real-world transfer by 8.9 and 8.8 points, respectively, without finetuning the underlying model.
Many children experience challenges in emotional regulation and social interaction, which can limit their participation in everyday activities and therapeutic programs. For socially assistive robots to be effective in this context, it is essential that children remain consistently and meaningfully engaged. We explore engagement strategies for a tactile robot designed to support children suffering from anxiety disorders through daily interactions. The robot delivers either synthetic emotional feedback or point rewards to encourage user participation. We evaluated these strategies through two studies: a preference assessment with 16 school children aged 6-8 years, and a behavioral study with 14 university students aged 20-27 years in naturalistic environments. The study with school children indicated a preference for emotional engagement over points-based approaches. The follow up study with university students across a full day of interactions revealed contrasting results: points-based systems produced significantly higher task accuracy (p < 0.05) and sustained performance over time. Findings from different user groups suggest that stated preferences and behavioral outcomes can diverge depending on engagement context, highlighting the importance of validating design assumptions through observed interaction. This work contributes insights into age-related differences in engagement strategy effectiveness in human-robot interaction design.