What a gated sensing pipeline never looks at: bandwidth reduction and the misses behind it

Raghu Venkat; Tricha Anjali

cs.CVSep 14, 2026

What a gated sensing pipeline never looks at: bandwidth reduction and the misses behind it

Authors: Raghu Venkat, Tricha Anjali

Organizations: Numberz.ai Inc., Alpharetta, GA

Abstract

An airborne sensor on a contested link cannot send video, so the appealing move is to send findings instead and report the ratio between the two. We evaluate a gated sensing pipeline that does this, combining learned object detection and image-text comparison with deterministic scheduling, gating, evidence accumulation and transmission rules. On staged footage with the semantic stage live it sends 38,736 bits over 211 s, a reduction of 41,977x, and names 1 of 4 staged events with no false report. That detection has since been superseded: a correction to how the tracker measures speed removed the measurement artefact the normality model had been learning from, and the flight no longer warms. Under the corrected code the pipeline names 1 of 7 staged events across four flights, and we report both. On a control flight where nothing was staged it reports nothing, a reduction of 155,830x: the largest number in the study and the least informative, because a reduction ratio measures the scene. The mechanisms that produce the reduction also decide which observations ever reach a decision, so the two cannot be reported apart. We give a tick-level trace of one flight (3,187 rows) that places each of three missed events at the stage where it stopped progressing: one produced no track, one failed the structural place test at 0.129, and one passed 539 structural ticks but reached only 3.192 against a boundary of 3.807. We also report one instance of a known failure mode, an online normality model absorbing the object it will later judge, measured against the threshold that object then failed. The evidence is one detection and six misses across four staged flights, beside one clean control, and we treat it as a case study. We give the reproduction protocol and generated results, identify which supporting artifacts are not distributed, and state which experiments did not run.

Explore similar work

Jul 21, 2026cs.CV

Detect Early, Escalate Rarely: Anytime Detection of AI-Generated Video from the Compressed Bitstream

Detectors for AI-generated video are evaluated offline. A clip is decoded to pixels and scored once, increasingly by a large vision-language model. Detection, however, is deployed online. We recast the task as streaming perception and score the motion field the codec already wrote into the bitstream. Reading that field is a parse, not a pixel-domain forward pass. Because the running aggregate is monotone, one end-calibrated threshold is anytime-valid at the data-dependent decision time. Recalibrating at each prefix is not. Escalation is priced in closed form. A compute budget maps to a deferral window, on a frontier monotone exactly where the deferral condition holds. On matched GenVidBench the codec stage reaches full-length AUC 0.64 at five orders of magnitude less compute than a pixel CNN, on CPU. Its gate holds the stopping-time false-positive rate at target while the real data match its calibration, and drifts above it under distribution shift. Deferring 15% of clips lifts accuracy from 0.75 to 0.78 at

7\times

less compute (paired: McNemar

p<10^{-6}

). The stage-1 ordering replicates on AIGVDBench. We introduce no new detector. The contribution is the reframing, two guarantees, and the measured frontiers. Code, configurations, and evaluation splits: https://github.com/KurbanIntelligenceLab/streamdet.

Mert Onur Cakiroglu, Mehmet Dalkilic, Hasan Kurban

Ai-Generated Image Detection Context Compression Escalation

Ask PDF

Jul 16, 2026cs.CV

Clean-Reference Streaming Detection of Lens Occlusion and Photometric Transitions for Camera Tamper Monitoring

A surveillance camera is an image sensor whose silent physical degradation invalidates every downstream consumer of its data. In-situ integrity alarms for such vision sensors require low false-alarm rates, bounded computation, and diagnosable behavior under nuisance illumination changes. This paper studies a deliberately narrow streaming integrity monitor for two low-cost sensor-fault signatures: texture-collapsing lens occlusion and abrupt photometric scene transition. The detector compares sampled luminance and local-gradient statistics with a clean-only sliding reference, applies coarse-grid structured-light rejection and mode/rapid-brightness suppression, and emits at most one notification per tamper episode. We formalize the decision predicates and derive a consistency rule for when rapid-brightness suppression makes the scene-transition path unreachable. On 320 in-scope controlled sequences, the default state machine attains 0.800 F1 and 0.822 balanced accuracy (significantly better paired correctness than the strongest baseline, though the F1 margin is not statistically resolved); on a magnitude-swept public audit it attains the highest partial AUC under a 5% false-alarm budget, and a separate extended-stress FPR-constrained sweep reaches 0.925 recall at 0.025 false-positive rate. Public Xiph, Bremen IoT, and UHCTD diagnostics show the fixed predicates preserve low false alarms while recall concentrates inside the declared envelope (UHCTD in-scope covered recall 0.667 versus 0.016 out of scope), and a 9.09-camera-hour verified-negative public audit records zero false alarms. The method is best interpreted as an auditable sensor-health subsystem rather than a universal camera-tamper classifier.

Bo Ma, WeiQi Yan, Jinsong Wu

Video Surveillance Vision Sensors Phase-Folded Light Curves Face Forgery Detection

Ask PDF

Jul 15, 2026cs.CV

Detector Confidence Signals Presence Rather Than Occlusion in Cluttered Manipulation

Occlude a named object until about an eighth of it remains visible, and an open-vocabulary detector's confidence that the object is present barely changes; as the clutter around it grows the confidence can even rise. On real video the detector still reports the object present in 99% of occluded frames, on another instance of the same category. This matters because that confidence is widely read as a visibility signal, used to threshold detections, evaluate open-vocabulary detectors, ground language, retrieve instances, and gate active perception. We audit whether it reflects occlusion by pairing every view with a geometry-segmentation oracle that gives detector-free ground-truth visibility. As true visibility falls from every scene to one in eight, the confidence stays nearly constant and uncorrelated with visibility, and the detector reports the target present in about nine of ten scenes, firing on same-category distractors: it signals that the category is present somewhere, not that the specific target is visible. The failure holds across three detectors (Grounding DINO, OWLv2, and Segment Anything Model 3), nine object categories, two simulators with different renderers and object sets, built and natural occlusion, and real video. Two consequences follow: a confidence-based metric understates the value of resolving occlusion by about ten times (8 against 88 points in our active-perception setting), and a confidence-based gate fires exactly when the object is hidden. No single-view signal we tried, including a realizable localization check, flags the occlusion, because the occluders sit where the target is. We connect the effect to detector miscalibration and object hallucination, release the controlled benchmark, and recommend target-grounded signals for gating and evaluation.

Yuanzhi He

Occlusion Active Perception

Ask PDF