Multicentre Bi-atrial Segmentation from LGE-MRI for Atrial Fibrillation with a 2D and 3D Framework
Abstract
Accurate delineation of bi-atrial structures from late gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) is an important prerequisite for structural analysis and future fibrosis-quantification workflows in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, automated segmentation is challenging due to thin-walled anatomy, domain shifts across imaging centres, and limited benchmarking of existing methods. This study presents a two-stage segmentation framework and benchmarking platform for evaluating how ROI localisation, encoder design, 2D/3D dimensionality, and ensemble fusion affect bi-atrial wall and cavity segmentation across multicentre LGE-MRI datasets. The framework integrates 3D localisation and fine segmentation using 2D and 3D U-Net variants with ResNeXt encoders and compares them with convolutional, transformer-based, and state-space architectures. { Evaluation across three independent cohorts assessed accuracy and cross-domain transfer without target-domain fine-tuning. Cavity segmentation transferred more consistently across centres than atrial wall segmentation, while wall performance remained sensitive to domain shift, particularly in the Kobe cohort.} By quantifying how 2D, 3D, and ensemble architectures behave across centres and between walls and cavities, this work provides a reproducible benchmark for future methodological development and clinical validation.
Figures & tables
| Study / benchmark | Evaluation type | Label focus |
| LA2018 [ 51 ] | Challenge | LA cavity |
| LAScarQS2022 [ 55 ] | Challenge | LA cavity, LAScar |
| MBAS2024 [ 33 ] | Challenge | LA cavity, RA cavity, Bi atrial wall |
| RAS [ 1 ] | Individual benchmark | RA cavity |
| biAtriaNet [ 8 ] | Individual evaluation | LA cavity, RA cavity, Bi atrial wall |
| TASSNet (This study) | Controlled benchmark | LA wall, RA wall, LA cavity, RA cavity |
| Dataset / Source | Training Images | Testing Images | Z-axis Slices | Final Resolution (mm) |
| Utah | 80 | 20 | 44 | 0.625 × 0.625 × 2.5 |
| Waikato | – | 11 | 44 | 0.625 × 0.625 × 2.5 |
| Kobe | – | 10 | 90 | 0.630 × 0.630 × 1.20 |
| Dataset | Intensity | Skewness | Kurtosis | Label Ent. | Image Ent. | MI |
| Utah (Train) | 12.26 19.73 | 3.33 | 23.91 | 0.1046 | 3.1799 | 0.0324 |
| Utah (Test) | 8.96 15.92 | 4.26 | 36.60 | 0.0955 | 2.8530 | 0.0324 |
| Utah (Combined) | 11.92 19.40 | 3.43 | 25.19 | 0.1037 | 3.1472 | 0.0325 |
| Waikato | 22.30 32.69 | 2.06 | 5.32 | 0.0872 | 3.6704 | 0.0216 |
| Kobe | 28.44 41.63 | 1.77 | 3.62 | 0.1319 | 3.0844 | 0.0348 |
| Model | Config | RA Wall | LA wall | RA cavity | LA cavity | ||||||||
| DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | ||
| nnUNet | 2D | 0.738 | 0.548 | 2.094 | 0.594 | 0.771 | 3.125 | 0.915 | 0.769 | 3.031 | 0.918 | 0.773 | 3.098 |
| 3D | 0.735 | 0.557 | 2.069 | 0.609 | 0.739 | 2.778 | 0.913 | 0.771 | 2.786 | 0.920 | 0.758 | 2.866 | |
| 3D low | 0.723 | 0.622 | 2.408 | 0.574 | 0.973 | 4.231 | 0.908 | 0.841 | 3.094 | 0.917 | 0.821 | 3.216 | |
| 3D cas. | 0.735 | 0.556 | 1.981 | 0.609 | 0.739 | 2.797 | 0.914 | 0.779 | 2.751 | 0.920 | 0.758 | 2.916 | |
| Ens. | 0.740 | 0.541 | 2.040 | 0.610 | 0.751 | 2.856 | 0.915 | 0.762 | 2.817 | 0.921 | 0.750 | 2.949 | |
| Model | Config | RA Wall | LA wall | RA cavity | LA cavity | ||||||||
| DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | ||
| nnUNet | 2D | 0.608 | 1.724 | 6.738 | 0.470 | 2.098 | 8.897 | 0.785 | 1.847 | 6.491 | 0.816 | 2.542 | 11.737 |
| 3D | 0.667 | 1.009 | 4.543 | 0.560 | 1.198 | 5.283 | 0.846 | 1.292 | 4.522 | 0.867 | 2.046 | 10.008 | |
| 3D low | 0.637 | 1.100 | 4.699 | 0.507 | 1.891 | 9.127 | 0.857 | 1.282 | 4.206 | 0.847 | 2.662 | 13.585 | |
| 3D cas. | 0.669 | 0.961 | 4.095 | 0.547 | 1.356 | 6.293 | 0.862 | 1.184 | 4.030 | 0.864 | 2.192 | 11.017 | |
| Ens. | 0.676 | 0.837 | 3.217 | 0.559 | 1.209 | 5.397 | 0.863 | 1.177 | 3.934 | 0.866 | 2.075 | 10.295 | |
| Model | Config | RA Wall | LA wall | RA cavity | LA cavity | ||||||||
| DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | DSC | ASD | HD95 | ||
| nnUNet | 2D | 0.444 | 4.710 | 17.779 | 0.431 | 3.681 | 12.139 | 0.778 | 4.079 | 19.364 | 0.852 | 2.384 | 8.295 |
| 3D | 0.502 | 2.822 | 13.625 | 0.440 | 4.077 | 12.964 | 0.800 | 2.580 | 9.067 | 0.837 | 2.596 | 9.258 | |
| 3D low | 0.454 | 5.735 | 21.432 | 0.472 | 2.971 | 13.037 | 0.703 | 4.660 | 16.492 | 0.861 | 2.570 | 10.017 | |
| 3D cas. | 0.481 | 3.328 | 14.127 | 0.457 | 3.599 | 12.093 | 0.790 | 3.066 | 10.379 | 0.795 | 5.219 | 27.413 | |
| Ens. | 0.464 | 5.285 | 18.483 | 0.436 | 4.414 | 15.975 | 0.753 | 4.161 | 12.495 | 0.789 | 4.671 | 20.766 | |
| Dataset | Inference Time (s) | |
| 2D | 3D | |
| Utah | 2.38 0.68 | 4.91 1.33 |
| Waikato | 2.51 0.67 | 4.71 1.56 |
| Kobe | 5.47 0.91 | 9.81 2.74 |
| Metric | Utah | Waikato | Kobe | |||
| LA | RA | LA | RA | LA | RA | |
| MAE | 7.098 | 5.809 | 9.075 | 8.948 | 9.161 | 15.852 |
| RMSE | 8.232 | 7.496 | 13.605 | 10.923 | 14.634 | 19.384 |
| MAPE (%) | 8.340 | 7.885 | 8.578 | 12.727 | 9.869 | 15.713 |
| 0.947 | 0.981 | 0.984 | 0.849 | 0.913 | 0.818 | |
| RC | 0.768 | 1.056 | 0.717 | 0.756 | 0.960 | 0.666 |
| Metric | Utah | Waikato | Kobe | |||
| LA | RA | LA | RA | LA | RA | |
| MAE | 3.855 | 2.675 | 6.289 | 3.853 | 8.073 | 5.623 |
| RMSE | 4.819 | 3.344 | 7.861 | 4.816 | 10.091 | 7.029 |
| MAPE (%) | 4.391 | 3.260 | 6.114 | 5.206 | 8.163 | 6.356 |
| 0.868 | 0.968 | 0.849 | 0.952 | 0.896 | 0.753 | |
| RC | 0.619 | 0.884 | 0.456 | 0.826 | 1.500 | 0.484 |