Towards Robust Classroom Attendance: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Face Detection and Recognition Models

Synthetic face datasets have become effective enough to train face recognition models with accuracy rivaling that of models trained on real photographs. This progress sidesteps the ethical and legal burdens of collecting real biometric data, yet evaluation has not kept pace. Even studies that train entirely on synthetic images still rely on real-face benchmarks to measure performance, leaving the privacy problem only half solved. We ask whether synthetic datasets can replace real benchmarks for face recognition evaluation. We test 12 synthetic datasets against 7 established real benchmarks using 24 pre-trained models that span both convolutional and transformer architectures. Our evaluation covers biometric verification metrics, similarity score distributions, cross-model ranking consistency, and the underlying distributional properties of each dataset. Benchmarking fidelity varies widely across the synthetic candidates, but the two strongest, MorphFace and Vec2Face, reproduce the relative behavior of real benchmarks and reach agreement levels that fall within the natural disagreement already observed among the real benchmarks themselves. These results establish that well-constructed synthetic datasets can support reliable comparative evaluation for face recognition, moving the field closer to a fully synthetic and privacy-preserving pipeline for both training and benchmarking.

The deployment of face detection models in real-world applications raises important fairness concerns, as these systems may showcase performance disparities across demographic groups. A key obstacle to studying and mitigating such biases is the lack of face detection datasets with sensitive feature annotations. To address this gap, we introduce WIDER-FAIR, a new dataset built on the widely used WIDER-FACE benchmark, manually annotated with the perceived ethnicity and sex of each face. The dataset contains 16,256 images annotated across four ethnic groups: Asian, Black, Indian, and White, and two sex categories. We assess the quality and coherence of the annotations using face embeddings, a K-Nearest Neighbors classifier, and a t-SNE visualization, all of which support the consistency of the labeling process. As a demonstration of the dataset's potential, we train a YOLOv5 model and perform ablation studies on each sensitive feature. Among other findings, our experiments show that detection performance is notably lower for faces of Black individuals, and that excluding this group from training increases fairness disparity more than excluding any other ethnic group. These observations illustrate the value of demographically annotated datasets for understanding and evaluating bias in face detection models.

Event cameras offer a promising sensing modality for face recognition due to their inherent advantages in illumination robustness and privacy-friendliness. However, because event streams lack the stable photometric appearance relied upon by conventional RGB-based face recognition systems, we argue that event-based face recognition should model structure-driven spatiotemporal identity representations shaped by rigid facial motion and individual facial geometry. Since dedicated datasets for event-based face recognition remain lacking, we construct EFace, a small-scale event-based face dataset captured under rigid facial motion. To learn effectively from this limited event data, we further propose EventFace, a framework for event-based face recognition that integrates spatial structure and temporal dynamics for identity modeling. Specifically, we employ Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to transfer structural facial priors from pretrained RGB face models to the event domain, thereby establishing a reliable spatial basis for identity modeling. Building on this foundation, we further introduce a Motion Prompt Encoder (MPE) to explicitly encode temporal features and a Spatiotemporal Modulator (STM) to fuse them with spatial features, thereby enhancing the representation of identity-relevant event patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EventFace achieves the best performance among the evaluated baselines, with a Rank-1 identification rate of 94.19% and an equal error rate (EER) of 5.35%. Results further indicate that EventFace exhibits stronger robustness under degraded illumination than the competing methods. In addition, the learned representations exhibit reduced template reconstructability.