cs.CLSep 19, 2026

Chronologic: Measuring Language Models' Ability to Represent the Past

Authors: Ted Underwood, Ziliang Qiu, Sarah Griebel, Laura K. Nelson, Edwin Roland, Wenyi Shang, Matthew Wilkens

Organizations: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · University of British Columbia · University of Missouri · Cornell University

Abstract

Language models are appealing tools for research on the past. But to trust the evidence a model provides, researchers need to know whether its responses fit the period represented. Validation is challenging, because this is not a task living people ordinarily perform, and because many questions have multiple correct answers. We use historical texts to develop a benchmark for a model's representation of English-language contexts 1831-1930, relying on pairwise comparisons to multiple ground truths and strong distractors to score the hardest questions in an appropriately graduated way. We find that generative tasks are harder than discriminative ones; in fact, reasoning models can typically discern the weakness of their own generated answers. While models pretrained exclusively on historical text lead the pack when evaluated by answer likelihood, they cannot compete with commercial models in free generation. None of the models we tested represent historical contexts in a fully persuasive way yet, but progress toward that goal is evident.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables5 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Pretraining Language Models on Historical Text

    Jun 2, 2026Xiaoxi Luo, Zachary Shinnick, Niclas Griesshaber +5Language Model PretrainingLLM Evaluation

  2. Kongzi: A Historical Large Language Model with Fact Enhancement

    Apr 13, 2025Jiashu Yang, Ningning Wang, Yian Zhao +5Language ModelingRL for Language Model Reasoning