Do LiDAR Language Models Really Understand Spatio-temporal Relationships?

LiDAR provides precise geometric information for spatial perception tasks such as object detection in autonomous driving and outdoor robotics. However, recognizing and localizing individual objects is not sufficient to answer questions that require composing spatial relations and grounding the intended target. Motivated by recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for autonomous driving, we leverage their language priors to interpret complex spatial questions and ground the referred target in LiDAR geometry. To support this spatial grounding capability, we introduce SpatialLiDAR-QA, which combines single- and multi-step relational grounding with complementary spatial understanding tasks. We further propose SpatialLiDAR-LM, which aligns LiDAR point features with an LLM and grounds target coordinates through language-conditioned, position-aware proposal retrieval and local point refinement. This design derives target coordinates directly from local LiDAR geometry rather than through textual language decoding. Experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over representative LiDAR--language models and multi-camera VLMs on precise coordinate prediction tasks. Our dataset and model training code will be publicly released.

Recent large multimodal models (LMMs) have become increasingly capable on image and video understanding, yet still struggle to sustain 4D continuous spatiotemporal dynamic reasoning. To study this capability gap, we formulate trajectory-grounded multi-turn spatiotemporal dialogue, a new task in which a model must answer spatiotemporal queries while returning structured 3D target trajectories over an entire short clip or a specified segment of a longer clip, and introduce Track4D-Bench, a benchmark with 526 clip-level dialogue samples spanning 23.5k frames and 7.5k object annotations, for training and evaluation. Building on this task, we propose LMM-Track4D, which combines RTGE (Ray--Time Geometry Encoding), a dedicated streaming state token TRK for long-horizon dynamic propagation, and an Object-Slot Kinematic, Residual-Anchor (OSK-RA) decoder for stable 4-step 3D state estimation under occlusion and viewpoint variation. Experiments on Track4D-Bench show consistent improvements over strong baselines, suggesting that explicit dynamic state modeling is a useful design principle for eliciting 4D dynamic reasoning in LMMs. Our code and dataset will be publicly available at https://github.com/mikubaka88/LMM-Track4D.

As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in decision-critical pipelines such as robotics, embodied AI, and safety monitoring, the opacity of their spatial judgments limits operator trust and auditability. MLLMs demonstrate strong reasoning but often struggle with fine-grained spatial understanding and object hallucination. Prior work, ByDeWay, introduced Layered-Depth-Based Prompting (LDP), a training-free framework that mitigates hallucinations by structuring prompts using monocular depth estimation. However, coarse depth layering falls short in resolving object-to-object spatial relationships within the same geometric plane, such as projective ("left of", "above") and topological ("inside", "touching") relations. We propose ByDeWay-V2, which integrates explicit spatial relational context alongside depth cues, expressed as human-readable predicates that serve as auditable evidence for downstream decision support. Using an open-vocabulary object detector (YOLO-World-L), our framework computes pairwise geometric relations between detected objects and injects them as structured spatial predicates into the MLLM prompt, bridging 3D scene depth and 2D spatial semantics without any training. We evaluate ByDeWay-V2 on the Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR) and BLINK benchmarks across multiple MLLMs, with hallucination grounding assessed via POPE. On the BLINK spatial subset, ByDeWay-V2 achieves a 46 percent relative F1 improvement over LDP for Qwen2.5-VL, and recovers BLIP-Base's spatial reasoning on VSR from near-random performance to a competitive F1 of 0.53. Our lightest configuration operates under a strict 40-token context budget on CPU, showing the framework's suitability for resource-constrained, real-time decision-support settings.