Organizations: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada · University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA · Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA · Looop Inc., Tokyo, Japan · Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA · Miro, Amsterdam, Netherlands · NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA · Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA · Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Advances in processing power, camera technologies, and mobile image analysis have made smartphones and other mobile devices, such as laptops, increasingly suitable for medical diagnosis and healthcare applications. Researchers have developed low-cost solutions for the early detection and monitoring of various health conditions, including eye and ENT diseases, malnutrition, heart rate variability, skin and oral conditions, and injuries, using images captured by non-medical devices such as smartphones and webcams. This survey examines existing research on mobile image-based medical diagnosis, with an emphasis on its potential to enable low-cost and accessible healthcare. We comparatively analyze state-of-the-art solutions across different healthcare application categories, examining their advantages and limitations. Based on this analysis, we identify desirable characteristics of mobile image-based diagnostic tools and highlight areas where existing approaches have made progress as well as areas requiring further research. We also discuss application-specific and common challenges and outline directions for future research. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive overview of mobile image-based healthcare solutions and their potential to support low-cost disease diagnosis and monitoring, particularly for underserved populations in remote and resource-constrained settings.
Figures & tables
Figure 1 : Mobile image analysis in healthcare applications
Figure 2 : Taxonomy graph for included diseases categorized by application area
Specifications
( 7 )
( 13 )
( 10 )
( 8 )
( 14 )
Requires internet connection for high performance computing
✓
✗
✗
N/S
✓
Requires skilled users
✓
✗
✓
✗
✗
Requires additional equipment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Considers dark and noisy environment
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Considers movement artifacts
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Model integrated into a mobile application
N/A
✓
✗
✓
N/A
Table 1 : Pros and cons of representative literature in diabetic retinopathy
Specifications
( 50 )
( 51 )
( 53 )
( 54 )
( 55 )
( 56 )
( 57 )
( 58 )
( 59 )
( 60 )
Requires internet connection for high performance computing
✗
✓
N/S
N/S
✗
N/S
N/S
N/S
N/S
N/S
Requires skilled users
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Requires additional equipment
✗
✓
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Considers dark and noisy environment
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✓
✗
✓
✓
✓
Considers movement artifacts
N/A
N/A
✓
✗
✗
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
Model integrated into a mobile application
✓
✓
✗
✗
✓
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Table 2 : Pros and cons of representative literature in heart rate variability
Specifications
( 76 )
( 69 )
( 75 )
( 68 )
( 73 )
Requires skilled users
✗
✗
✗
✗
Requires additional equipment
✗
✗
✓
✗
✗
Considers dark and noisy environment
N/S
N/S
N/S
✗
✗
Model integrated into a mobile application
✓
✗
✓
✓
✗
Supports devices with variant configurations
N/S
N/S
✗
✗
✗
Performance validation w.r.t ground truth
✓
✗
✓
✓
✓
Table 3 : Pros and cons of representative literature in skin cancer
Specifications
( 83 )
( 77 )
( 78 )
( 80 )
( 84 )
( 85 )
( 86 )
Requires internet connection for high performance computing
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
N/S
Requires skilled users to operate the system
✓
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Requires additional equipment
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Requires additional information input by a trained professional
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✓
Considers dark and noisy environment
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
✓
✗
Accounts for other objects present in the image except skin
✓
✗
✓
✗
✓
✗
Table 4 : Pros and cons of representative literature in inflammatory skin diseases
Specifications
( 88 )
( 94 )
( 90 )
( 93 )
( 95 )
Requires internet connection for high performance computing
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Requires skilled users
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Requires additional equipment
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Considers dark and noisy environment
N/S
N/S
N/S
N/S
N/S
Model integrated into a mobile application
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Supports devices with variant configurations
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Table 5 : Pros and cons of representative literature in skin burn
Figure 3 : Architecture for image analysis for medical diagnosis
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Category
Disease
Description
Eye Diseases
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
Diabetic Retinopathy is an eye disease that damages the retina due to diabetes mellitus, often leading to blindness in working adults. Symptoms: Gradually worsening vision, sudden vision loss, floaters, blurred or patchy vision, eye pain or redness, difficulty seeing in the dark. Diagnosis: Diagnosed through stereoscopic fundus photographs.
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Retinopathy of Prematurity is an eye disease observed in premature infants and is a leading cause of blindness in children, preventable if treated early. Symptoms: Unusual eye movements, white pupils, vision loss. Diagnosis: Diagnosed using fundus images.
Cataract
Cataract is a common eye condition in the elderly that leads to poor vision and eventually blindness. Symptoms: Clouded or blurry vision, difficulty seeing at night, light sensitivity, seeing halos around lights, frequent changes in eyeglass prescription. Diagnosis: Diagnosed through a visual acuity test.
Glaucoma
Glaucoma is a cause of visual impairment and blindness that is often asymptomatic in its early stages, leading to undiagnosed cases until advanced. Symptoms: Intense eye pain, nausea, vomiting, red eyes, headaches, seeing rings around lights, blurred vision. Diagnosis: Diagnosed using the Goldmann tonometer.
Malnutrition
Obesity
Obesity, characterized by excess body weight, is a major health condition leading to various associated health problems. Symptoms: Breathlessness, increased sweating, snoring, difficulty in physical activity, frequent tiredness, joint and back pain. Diagnosis: Diagnosed through anthropometric measures such as weight, height, BMI, and waist-hip ratio.
Hemoglobin Deficiency
Hemoglobin carries oxygen to the body’s tissues, and a deficiency may signal iron-deficient anemia caused by malnutrition, among other diseases. Symptoms: Pale skin, brittle nails, pica syndrome (eating non-food items), lightheadedness when standing, shortness of breath, sore or inflamed tongue, mouth ulcers. Diagnosis: Diagnosed through blood tests.
Appendix
Table 6 : Summary of Various Healthcare Categories
Malaria remains a leading cause of mortality in resource-limited settings, where expert microscopists are scarce. Automated diagnosis based on microscopy images thus has strong potential to improve care delivery. But for an algorithm to deploy, a necessary requirement is that it meet a suite of non-obvious (from a machine learning (ML) perspective) clinical constraints. Therefore, in close consultation with a national health center we developed a malaria diagnosis pipeline which addresses key requirements listed by the health care center but typically ignored in the ML malaria literature. In particular, it includes: (i) stopping criteria (to reduce image acquisition and time-to-result); (ii) human-in-the-loop functionality (for review and accountability); (iii) multi-species discrimination (since treatment varies by species); (iv) thick film detection (standard for microscopy); (v) computationally-efficient uncertainty calculations (to aid clinician review); and (vi) an edge device platform (since internet can be spotty in this catchment area). The mobile system performs all inference on-device using YOLOv13n deployed via TensorFlow Lite. It detects four species and white blood cells from Giemsa-stained thick blood smear images, aggregating per-image detections into slide-level parasitemia with World Health Organization (WHO)-standard quantification. This paper highlights these various clinical constraints and offers methods to address them. Evaluated on 2,739 annotated images across all four species, the system achieves mAP@0.5 of 0.863, per-image parasite count correlation of r = 0.812, slide-level r = 0.951 (soft counting, 10 images/slide), and runs entirely offline with a pipeline time of 10.27 +- 1.65 s per image.
Idaya Seidu, Ahmed Tahiru Issah, Charles B. Delahunt +1
Carnegie Mellon University Africa, Kigali Innovation City, Kigali, Rwanda · University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness, yet rural regions often lack the specialists and infrastructure needed for early detection. Although cloud-based deep learning systems offer high accuracy, they face significant challenges in these settings due to high latency, limited bandwidth, and high data transmission costs. To address these challenges, we propose a two-tier edge-cloud cascade on the public APTOS 2019 Blindness Detection dataset. Tier 1 runs a lightweight MobileNetV3-small model on a local clinic device to perform a binary triage between Referable DR (Classes 2-4) and Non-referable DR (Classes 0-1). Tier 2 runs a RETFoundDINOv2 model in the cloud for ordinal severity grading, but only on the subset of images flagged as referable by Tier 1. On a stratified APTOS test split of 733 images, Tier 1 reaches 98.99% sensitivity and 84.37% specificity at a validation-tuned high-sensitivity threshold. The default cascade forwards 49.52% of test images to Tier 2, reducing cloud calls by 50.48% relative to using a cloud-based model for all images. In the deployed 4-class output space (Class 0-1 / Class 2 / Class 3 / Class 4), the cascade obtains 80.49% accuracy and 0.8167 quadratic weighted kappa; the cloud-only baseline obtains 80.76% accuracy and 0.8184 quadratic weighted kappa. On APTOS, the cascade cuts cloud use by about half with a modest drop in grading performance. Index Terms: Diabetic Retinopathy, Edge-Cloud Cascade, MobileNetV3-small, RETFound-DINOv2, Retinal Screening, tele-ophthalmology
Nishi Doshi, Shrey Shah
University of Southern California · Los Angeles, USA
Purpose: Early screening for eye diseases is critical in low- and middle-income countries where access to care is limited. We investigate whether a confidence-guided, multi-image diabetic retinopathy diagnosis framework can integrate image filtering with confidence-aware predictions for reliable screening at capture. Methods: We develop a multi-image fusion method that aggregates retinal views to improve confidence and balanced accuracy. Our method uses confidence to identify unreliable predictions, prompting retakes when needed. We compare: (1) a cascaded image-quality and disease diagnosis pipeline using a single image per patient, (2) confidence-based prediction, and (3) our confidence-based multi-image fusion pipeline. All methods are evaluated using a RETFoundGreen backbone on the mBRSET (n = 1,234) and BRSET (n = 7,599) datasets. Results: At 70% coverage, our method achieves 91% balanced accuracy on mBRSET and 97% on BRSET, improvements of ~12% and ~6%, respectively, over cascade filtering. The image-quality cascade reaches sensitivities of 61% on mBRSET and 86% on BRSET, whereas our framework reaches 94% and 96%, respectively, at 50% coverage. Conclusions: Human-annotated quality labels are weakly associated with diagnostic performance, and confidence-based filtering consistently outperforms image quality-based cascaded pipelines. Translational Relevance: Using confidence-based multi-image fusion, patients receive more reliable predictions, reducing incorrect diagnoses during screening. The lightweight backbone and single inference pass per image make the framework compatible with low-latency mobile screening systems in resource-limited settings.
Ananya Raghu, Anisha Raghu, Alice S. Tang +3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA · Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA · Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA +3