Speech Block Influence: Component-Specific Layer Scoring for Pruning Speech LLMs

Speech Large Language Models route speech encoder representations into an LLM decoder that typically accounts for over 90% of total parameters. We study how much of this decoder capacity is actually needed for speech tasks. Across two LLM families and three scales (1-8B), we show that decoder redundancy is largely inherited from the pretrained LLM: text and speech inputs yield similar redundant blocks. We then measure excess capacity by pruning decoder layers and analysing post-pruning healing to increase robustness. Our findings show that 7-8B models retain good ASR performance with only 60% of decoder layers, and the same trend extends to smaller scales with reduced pruning tolerance. We then generalise to speech translation, and show that the same blocks of layers are redundant across speech encoders, tasks and languages, indicating that a more global redundancy structure exists, enabling a single pruned and multi-tasks SpeechLLM backbone to be deployed.

Speech large language models (Speech LLMs) typically encode speech into sequences far longer than text, creating a major efficiency bottleneck during autoregressive decoding. A common remedy is to compress the speech sequence at the adapter level to remove temporal redundancy before it enters the LLM; however, such early downsampling risks discarding fine-grained information that cannot be recovered. We propose SpeechKV, which applies a learned pooling to the KV cache of speech tokens inside the LLM. This design allows the LLM to fuse speech and text internally while directly accelerating decoding. Trained on 71K hours of speech data, SpeechKV compresses the speech to approximately text-level granularity yet maintains performance on par with or even slightly better than the uncompressed baseline, with relative gains of 6.6% on out-of-domain entity recognition and 2.3% on OpenASR, while delivering at least 1.49 times decoding speedup that scales with audio length.

Speech-LLMs are expensive to run, making compression important for real-world deployment. However, compressed models are usually selected using aggregate word error rate (WER), which can hide how pruning affects different demographic groups. In this work, we systematically study the effect of audio encoder pruning on SLAM-ASR for different demographic groups. Using the Fair-Speech and Common Voice datasets, we found that the pruning does not affect all demographic groups equally; the gap between best- and worst-performing groups increases in fold. These disparities appear across all three encoder scales, but only the largest model initially hides them behind aggregate WER. LoRA adaptation improves WER for every group, but benefits groups already performing well more strongly and widens for certain groups. On Common Voice English, Danish, and Dutch, accent gaps persist but do not clearly widen, showing that the fairness effects of pruning vary across datasets and must be measured directly. Our findings suggest that for pruned models, deployment decisions should include per-group WER, with the worst-performing group's error rate as an explicit criterion.