Adapting Vision-Language Models for Human-Readable XAI in Industrial Object Detection

Explaining Machine Learning (ML) results in a transparent and user-friendly manner remains a challenging task of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In this paper, we present a method to enhance the interpretability of ML models by using a Knowledge Graph (KG). We store domain-specific data along with ML results and their corresponding explanations, establishing a structured connection between domain knowledge and ML insights. To make these insights accessible to users, we designed a selective retrieval method in which relevant triplets are extracted from the KG and processed by a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate user-friendly explanations of ML results. We evaluated our method in a manufacturing environment using the XAI Question Bank. Beyond standard questions, we introduce more complex, tailored questions that highlight the strengths of our approach. We evaluated 33 questions, analyzing responses using quantitative metrics such as accuracy and consistency, as well as qualitative ones such as clarity and usefulness. Our contribution is both theoretical and practical: from a theoretical perspective, we present a novel approach for effectively enabling LLMs to dynamically access a KG in order to improve the explainability of ML results. From a practical perspective, we provide empirical evidence showing that such explanations can be successfully applied in real-world manufacturing environments, supporting better decision-making in manufacturing processes.

Deploying AI-based visual inspection in manufacturing is hard because requirements change often, new defect types appear, and large labeled datasets are rarely available. We propose answer-conditioned chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation for rapidly adapting small vision-language models (VLMs) to new industrial tasks using minimal labeled data. A frontier VLM receives each training image along with its correct label and generates a justified visual explanation. A 3B-parameter model is then fine-tuned on these reasoning-augmented examples via LoRA. By conditioning on correct answers, we ensure all training reasoning is directed toward the correct conclusion, which is critical because frontier models score as low as 24.1% on our hardest task. We validate on four industrial classification tasks spanning three image modalities using only 18 to 30 labeled images per task. Across 4 seeds per task (32 training runs), our method outperforms direct fine-tuning on all 16 seed-task combinations, with mean improvements of +1.7 to +4.4 percentage points. A controlled equal-budget experiment confirms the improvement comes from reasoning quality, not additional training steps. An unconditioned baseline demonstrates that with out answer-conditioning, wrong reasoning degrades performance by 17.8 percentage points. On weld radiograph classification, the fine-tuned 3B model outperforms GPT-4.1 by 10.0pp using just 24 training images.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) seeks to enhance the transparency and accountability of machine learning systems, yet most methods follow a one-size-fits-all paradigm that neglects user differences in expertise, goals, and cognitive needs. Although Large Language Models can translate technical explanations into natural language, they introduce challenges related to faithfulness and hallucinations. To address these challenges, we present PONTE (Personalized Orchestration for Natural language Trustworthy Explanations), a human-in-the-loop framework for adaptive and reliable XAI narratives. PONTE models personalization as a closed-loop validation and adaptation process rather than prompt engineering. It combines: (i) a low-dimensional preference model capturing stylistic requirements; (ii) a preference-conditioned generator grounded in structured XAI artifacts; and (iii) verification modules enforcing numerical faithfulness, informational completeness, and stylistic alignment, optionally supported by retrieval-grounded argumentation. User feedback iteratively updates the preference state, enabling quick personalization. Automatic and human evaluations across healthcare and finance domains show that the verification-refinement loop substantially improves completeness and stylistic alignment over validation-free generation. Human studies further confirm strong agreement between intended preference vectors and perceived style, robustness to generation stochasticity, and consistently positive quality assessments.