Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation for Acoustic Pedestrian Detection
Authors: Yonghyun Kim, Chaeyeon Han, Sancho Gatungay, Subhrajit Guhathakurta, Alexander Lerch
Organizations: Music Informatics Group, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA · Center for Urban Resilience and Analytics, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA · College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
Audio-only pedestrian detection is attractive for urban sensing but limited by weak acoustic cues. An appealing strategy is cross-modal knowledge distillation, in which a video teacher supervises the audio student during training so that the deployed model runs on audio alone. Under this task's severe class imbalance and wide video-audio modality gap, however, what such distillation contributes is unclear. We introduce Trust-Filtered Distillation (TFD), which selectively suppresses teacher supervision on pedestrian samples, and interpret its logit formulation as conditional label smoothing under a shared temperature. Across ten distillation configurations under five-fold cross-session validation on ASPED, most methods yield modest gains in macro accuracy accompanied by small changes in PR-AUC. The main effect is higher no-pedestrian accuracy at the cost of lower pedestrian recall. Adding TFD to logit distillation strengthens this trade-off without improving mean PR-AUC. These findings clarify the benefits and limitations of selective cross-modal supervision by distinguishing operating-point shifts from discrimination gains in imbalanced acoustic detection.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: System pipeline ( trainable, frozen). Teacher supervision is used only during training, and inference is audio-only. The TFD mask gates the logit and hybrid losses via Eq. 3 ( τ=0.4 ), and the masked KD term is aggregated by Eq. 2 .
Method
Macro ↑
No-Ped ↑
Ped ↑
F1Ped↑
PR-AUC ↑
d↑
Baseline (CE)
72.9
63.5
82.3
28.6
0.328
–
Logit-based KD
LogitKD
73.6
70.8
76.4
31.2
0.332
1.17
LogitKD 0.3
73.8
70.3
77.2
30.9
0.326
1.36
Imbalance-aware KD
LogitKD EMA
73.6
68.5
78.7
30.4
0.324
1.15
Table 1: LOSO 5-fold means (accuracies and F1Ped in percent, PR-AUC in [0,1] , per-fold macro std 1.6 – 2.1 ). d is Cohen’s d (population std) on per-fold macro differences vs. the baseline. Paired t -test p by row ( ∗ : p<0.05 ): 0.079 , 0.053 , 0.083 , 0.104 , 0.324 , 0.106 , 0.579 , 0.096 , 0.033∗ , 0.026∗ . None survives Bonferroni ( 0.005 , ten tests).
Cross-modal knowledge distillation transfers useful representations or predictions between modalities, often enabling cheaper single-modality inference.