CLAP: Closed-Loop Alignment with Pressure for Precise Suction Manipulation

Turning a frontier vision-language model into a robot policy usually means fine-tuning it to emit an action representation it never saw in pretraining, which throws away much of the reasoning that made the model worth reaching for. We go the other way and keep the VLM frozen. It writes the policy as a short Python control function, with no demonstrations and no fine-tuning. Writing that code once is open-loop, though. Existing closed-loop methods react at the wrong level: they retry a fixed policy or pick a different subtask, but never rewrite the code that failed. VLCP closes the loop where the failure actually lives, on the control code, within a single episode. Every $K$ steps the VLM re-observes the scene from multi-view RGB, proprioceptive state, and a state delta, then rewrites the control function from what it just saw, so a failure is caught before it compounds. We evaluate on a 57-task MuJoCo/RoboVerse sweep. This training-free policy reaches $35.1\%$ pooled success, against $3.5\%$ for the identical system queried once per episode. That tenfold gap holds with non-overlapping confidence intervals in every scene family. The gain traces to a $27.3\%$ within-episode recovery rate on failed grasps: a miss an open-loop controller would carry to the end of the episode gets re-observed and fixed at the next replan. And the loop stays cheap. A median $84\%$ of input tokens hit cache, an episode needs only about $10$ compact queries, and control blocks written during any replan persist to a cross-episode skill library reused in later prompts.

Modern imitation learning methods, including visuomotor and Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, typically output high-level action references that are executed by low-level controllers. However, the absence of higher-order reference signals, together with the policy's lack of awareness of the underlying low-level control dynamics during training, inevitably induces an execution gap. As a result, realized actions deviate systematically from policy-commanded ones, with a critical impact on precision-sensitive manipulation. Prior work either modifies the policy architecture or the low-level controller, both requiring intrusive changes to the pretrained policy or packaged controller. This raises a natural question: when the policy and controller are both treated as inaccessible black boxes, can we bridge the execution gap? We propose Adaptive Policy Execution (APEX), a plug-and-play framework inserted between the policy and the controller that reconstructs a dynamically feasible reference from policy outputs and adapts at test-time according to low-level state feedback, with a provable convergence guarantee. Extensive empirical studies show that APEX reduces controller-induced tracking error by 41.2% on demonstration replay and improves manipulation success by 4.8--25.8 percentage points across four visuomotor and VLA policy classes.

A user who brings a generalist manipulation policy into their home or office wants it to pick up their objects from their shelves, counters, and tables. Yet even a strong generalist like $π_{0.5}$ achieves 0% pickup success in our captured deployment scenes without adaptation, and collecting real demonstrations in every user's environment is prohibitively expensive. We present Splat2Act, an automated real-to-sim-to-real pipeline that personalizes a pretrained vision-language-action (VLA) policy to a specific scene and object set using only a handheld phone scan and images of the user's objects. Unlike prior real-to-sim work that reconstructs individual tabletops, Splat2Act operates on building-scale indoor environments: it builds a photorealistic digital twin with 3D Gaussian Splatting and collision geometry, automatically discovers tabletop and non-tabletop receptacles, constructs feasible pickup tasks, and generates successful demonstrations with a privileged simulation oracle, with only scene and object capture required from a human. Applied to 101 scanned campus environments with a median navigable area of 104.87 m$^2$ and 7 receptacles, the pipeline yields 852 receptacles and over 68,000 pickup demonstrations. We fine-tune $π_{0.5}$ in two stages: Stage 1 adapts to hundreds of public object assets, drawn either from the deployment scene alone or from all 101 scenes; Stage 2 personalizes to the user's own objects on the deployment scene's receptacles. Our strongest personalized policy reaches 62.5% aggregate pickup success in the target scene. Deployed on a real Stretch 3, the same policy achieves 63.9% success on a 12-task subset, closely tracking its 66.7% simulated success on those tasks. These results suggest that automated real-to-sim-to-real training can personalize VLA manipulation policies using only simulation-oracle data.