TopoMamba: A Load-Support Relation-Guided Multi-Directional State-Space Model for Topology Optimization

Deep generative models offer a promising paradigm for topology optimization, enabling rapid design exploration. However, these approaches lack intrinsic physics guidance, often leading to poor generalizability across unseen boundary conditions and the formation of floating material artifacts. To address these limitations, we propose Hierarchical Physics-Guided Diffusion (HPG-Diff), a novel diffusion framework that enforces physics consistency through two synergistic mechanisms. First, we introduce a hierarchical physics-guided strategy that aligns different precomputed physics features with the denoising process, guiding material distribution toward optimal load paths to enhance generalizability. Second, we propose a floating material suppression loss as a differentiable connectivity constraint inspired by thermal conduction to improve topological connectivity. By simulating a virtual heat propagation process from load positions, this mechanism explicitly penalizes floating material during training. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate that HPG-Diff achieves average compliance errors of 0.87% (in-distribution) and 5.29% (out-of-distribution), while reducing floating material ratios to 2.90% and 2.44%, respectively. Furthermore, case studies on a 3:1 rectangular domain, including cantilever and bridge benchmarks, provide preliminary evidence that lightweight LoRA fine-tuning with a small dataset can support the adaptation of HPG-Diff to rectangular non-square domains.

Topology optimisation (TO) often requires repeated finite element analysis and sensitivity-based material updates, which can be costly when multiple candidate designs are needed under varying physical and design conditions. Generative TO offers a route to rapid design exploration, but existing models may rely on adversarial training, long reverse-diffusion sampling, or external guidance to maintain structural feasibility and physical consistency. This study develops a flow matching-based topology optimisation (FMTO) framework for conditional topology generation. Linear FMTO is first formulated as an endpoint-based baseline by interpolating between a Gaussian source field and the BESO reference topology. To introduce mechanically meaningful intermediate states, a trajectory-aware FMTO formulation is proposed, where volume-fraction-indexed BESO states are used to construct the probability path and target velocity field. This incorporates physics-guided optimisation history into generative flow learning without adding inference-time optimisation. A path--velocity mismatch analysis explains why moderate trajectory weighting can improve generation stability, whereas excessive guidance may over-constrain the learned transport. Numerical examples show that FMTO generates diverse topology candidates with improved compliance-related performance, volume-fraction satisfaction, topology fidelity, and substantially fewer sampling steps than a diffusion-based baseline. Under limited training data, trajectory-aware FMTO achieves the best overall performance with a moderate trajectory weight. Studies on trajectory-anchor density and three-dimensional topology generation further demonstrate the influence of path design and the applicability of the proposed framework beyond two-dimensional problems.

Natural load-bearing patterns such as leaf venation, trabecular bone, and spider webs achieve high stiffness per unit mass, yet classical topology optimizers rarely reach such geometries, and few let engineers express structural design intent through natural language. This work treats a frozen text-to-image diffusion model as a training-free source of design knowledge and distills it into the physics loop of density-based topology optimization via score distillation sampling, so that a text prompt becomes an explicit, machine-interpretable representation of engineer intent. The prompt-induced generative gradient and the finite element sensitivity are combined at every iteration, letting physics decide which prompt-induced features survive. In 245 primary SDS runs spanning four geometric domains and two physics regimes, 38 of 49 prompt--domain combinations achieved statistically significant compliance reductions (up to $-31.5\%$ mechanical and $-23.0\%$ thermoelastic), outperforming gradient-based baselines. Cross-domain morphological analysis identifies a recurring structural signature of improvement: in most domains the generative prior suppresses dead-end branches in the rib skeleton, with endpoint--compliance correlation $r = +0.56$ to $+0.99$. A Heaviside projection with $\beta$-continuation resolves a pronounced intermediate-density tendency in this diffusion--physics coupling ($42.6\%$ to $<3\%$), and an automated skeleton-based pipeline converts optimized density fields into \rev{candidate geometry ready for computer-aided design. By retargeting the generative prior across domains, loading conditions, and physics objectives through a change of text prompt, with each new problem's physics setup specified separately, the framework uses a pretrained generative model as a reusable, training-free prior for engineering design.