When Does Exercise-Specific Joint Selection Help? An Audit of Evaluation and Control Design

Skeleton-based action recognition can support automated tracking of physiotherapy exercises, particularly in remote rehabilitation settings where continuous in-person supervision is impractical. However, most existing methods are developed for large-scale daily-action benchmarks rather than rehabilitation scenarios. Public rehabilitation exercise datasets are typically small, with only subtle kinematic differences between exercise classes. For participants with motor impairments, exercise execution may also deviate from standard movement patterns in amplitude, speed, and coordination, increasing intra-class variability and making reliable recognition more difficult for skeleton-based models. We propose PhysioAI, a clinical knowledge-guided semantic supervision framework that injects structured physiotherapy knowledge into skeleton representation learning. PhysioAI combines graph-based spatiotemporal modelling of human movement with training-time semantic anchors derived from a structured Clinical Knowledge Dictionary (CKD). The CKD descriptions are encoded using a frozen Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) model and projected into an anchor space, where they provide class-specific semantic targets for skeleton representation learning. The resulting CKD-derived anchors are used only during skeleton-model training; inference requires only skeleton inputs. Under subject-disjoint evaluation, PhysioAI achieves $99.03\pm1.34\%$ on KiMoRe Overall, $94.64\pm7.36\%$ on the Hard-67 stress test, and $87.44\pm7.69\%$ on UI-PRMD Overall. These results exceed the strongest comparator for each endpoint by $0.27$, $2.87$, and $1.33$ percentage points (pp), respectively. These findings demonstrate that structured clinical knowledge can serve as an effective source of training-time supervision for physiotherapy action recognition.

Coreset selection picks a representative subset of the labeled training set to make training cheaper. However, it is usually evaluated by downstream accuracy at a fixed subset size, ignoring both the time spent selecting the subset and the training recipe behind each reported number. We introduce an end-to-end benchmark that standardizes downstream training and charges selection and training to the same auditable wall-clock budget, spanning 4 datasets from CIFAR-10 to ImageNet-1K, 11 selectors, 5 fractions, and 3 seeds, with over 1,500 released runs. Repeated-sampling work has shown that budget-aware evaluation already favors random strategies. Our two budget studies test whether that verdict survives when every selector is granted its most favorable operating point. Across eight wall-clock budget anchors on each of CIFAR-10 and Tiny ImageNet, no anchor is won by a sophisticated selector: every winner is class-balanced random sampling, repeated random sampling, or full-data training. In fixed-budget duels on ImageNet-1K, training on all data for fewer epochs beats every selection strategy we probe while also costing the least. A per-dataset cost audit shows that selection cost is dominated at every scale by a fixed full-dataset scan, so it cannot be amortized away by selecting a smaller fraction, and its absolute size does not extrapolate from one dataset to another. We further quantify when selection does pay back through subset reuse, and document 9 correctness fixes to a widely used codebase, one of which shifts a standard Herding baseline by nearly 6 points. Selection time is not free preprocessing, and an evaluation that ignores it measures the wrong quantity.

Modern methods reconstruct or generate simulation-ready articulated objects, predicting not only their geometry but also how their parts are connected and allowed to move. Evaluating the geometry is straightforward, but evaluating the predicted articulation is not, because articulation specifies a motion rather than a shape, and there is no agreed distance between two motions. More specifically, existing protocols score joint type, axis direction, origin, and motion limits separately, although these parameters jointly describe a single physical motion, and the same motion can be written as different parameter values. As a result, a joint can score maximally wrong against an equivalent encoding of itself, and several component errors are ill-conditioned or undefined exactly where predictions become accurate. We propose ArticulateArena, a representation-invariant counterpart of Chamfer distance for articulation that compares the motions one-DOF joints induce rather than the parameters that encode them. It represents each joint by the unordered pair of its Lie-algebra endpoint twists, and we prove that the resulting quotient distance is a metric. It unifies fixed, revolute, prismatic, and helical joints, brings continuous joints into the same score through a compactification, and reads as the RMS motion of the moving part in meters when weighted by its mass distribution. A motion-aware tree edit distance lifts the metric to full kinematic trees, pricing structural errors such as spurious or missing joints in the same motion units as joint errors, and for a fixed inner product it remains a metric on trees up to relabeling. Alongside the metric we release ArticulateArena-20K, a new suite of 19,977 articulated objects with verified kinematics, and we re-evaluate published reconstruction methods on it under the new metric. Project page: https://heyumeng.com/ArticulateArena-web/