Artifact Annotations Partially Substitute for Per-User Calibration: SAFE-EDA and a Normalization-Controlled Evaluation of Wrist-EDA Affect Recognition

Electrodermal activity (EDA) is widely used in wearable Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) systems for continuous health monitoring, including autonomic assessment. However, EDA signals are highly vulnerable to motion artifacts and environmental noise, limiting reliable deployment in harsh operating conditions such as underwater. This study proposes a robust, deployable EDA denoising framework that generalizes across multiple measurement locations and harsh environments. The framework integrates a hybrid CNN-Transformer teacher model with a lightweight depth-wise separable CNN student model via a knowledge distillation (KD) strategy. To further improve robustness, a realistic data augmentation scheme is introduced to simulate diverse motion artifacts and environmental distortions. The KD-based student model significantly reduces model size (7.87 MB to 0.51 MB) and computational cost (105.1M to 11.61M FLOPs) while maintaining denoising performance (MAE: 0.144, SNR improvement: 12.08 dB) using the public dataset validation. In real-world underwater conditions (UMAC dataset) testing, the proposed method substantially improves skin conductance response reconstruction, reducing mean absolute error from 2.809 to 0.215. Furthermore, on independent testing using the CNS-OT dataset, the denoised signals enhanced downstream CNS-OT prediction performance, achieving the highest AUROC (0.806) compared to prior denoising methods. The proposed method also improved the early prediction rate (sensitivity) from 0.550 to 0.767, enabling CNS-OT prediction up to a median of 6.9 minutes before symptom onset. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework not only improves EDA signal quality but also enhances clinically relevant prediction performance while remaining suitable for deployment in resource-constrained wearable Internet of Things systems operating in harsh environments.

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a cornerstone of brain-computer interfaces and clinical neuroscience, yet deep learning models are typically trained and evaluated under a single, unreported preprocessing pipeline. We formalize preprocessing choices as a counterfactual intervention space and show that EEG predictions are surprisingly unstable under this space: across six datasets spanning four paradigms, up to 42% of trial-level predictions flip when only the preprocessing changes, a variability that standard uncertainty methods do not explicitly quantify because they condition on a fixed preprocessing pipeline. We provide three tools to make this instability measurable, decomposable, and reducible. First, a Walsh-Hadamard decomposition of the 2^7 pipeline space reveals that sensitivity is near-additive in practice under the binary intervention design, enabling efficient step-by-step optimization. Second, we introduce Preprocessing Uncertainty (PU), a per-trial diagnostic that captures a dimension of instability complementary to model-based confidence. Third, we study Normalized Adaptive PGI (NA-PGI), a graph-structured regularizer that exploits the compositional structure of preprocessing interventions as one mitigation strategy with clear scope conditions.

Pretrained EEG foundation models are proposed for clinical decoding, but whether reported gains transfer across populations or survive negative controls is unclear. We benchmark LaBraM, EEGMamba, CBraMod, REVE, LEAD, BENDR, and BIOT on five clinical tasks across four datasets. Primary analyses use frozen linear probes with subject-disjoint LOSO or grouped five-fold validation. Because CAUEEG releases no patient identifiers, it is evaluated at recording level with a patient-disjoint sensitivity. We challenge apparent gains using stronger classical comparators, label permutation, scrambled-label fine-tuning, and random-initialisation controls. In a matched 19-channel CAUEEG evaluation (Normal/MCI/Dementia; N = 1,187 recordings), classical features achieve 0.734 macro-AUROC versus 0.699 for BIOT, 0.669 for CBraMod, and 0.568 for REVE. A patient-disjoint sensitivity retains the classical-over-REVE ordering (0.717 versus 0.565). Dataset identity is decoded from frozen REVE embeddings at or near ceiling across Western-Korean and Western-Western pairs, including after PCA-50 and removal of line-frequency and amplitude-scale information. This establishes dataset membership, not a causal site or population effect. A matched random-initialised encoder exceeds pretrained REVE on CAUEEG (0.659 versus 0.570). On CHB-MIT cross-subject ictal detection (n = 23), REVE reaches 0.793, versus 0.739 for the best enhanced nonlinear comparator, 0.701 for random initialisation, and 0.505 for raw-signal random features. Because preprocessing removes absolute amplitude, this does not establish superiority over every plausible handcrafted baseline. Conclusions change materially after montage matching, patient-overlap checks, stronger comparators, and representation controls. We distill these checks into a reporting protocol for clinical EEG foundation-model studies.