When History Fails to Become Experience: Action Calibration in Language Agents

Language model agents are increasingly effective in solving realistic tasks through multi-turn tool use. However, training reliable tool-using agents remains challenging in practice. While reinforcement learning provides an on-policy paradigm for improving agents from their own environment interactions, its effectiveness depends heavily on the training task distribution. When tasks are fixed before training, the task distribution can become increasingly mismatched with the policy's evolving capabilities, causing many rollouts to be spent on uninformative tasks. We propose SENTINEL, a failure-driven reinforcement learning framework that turns the Solver's rollout failures into targeted training tasks. SENTINEL follows a Controller--Proposer--Solver loop: the Controller analyzes failed trajectories and summarizes recurring error patterns, the Proposer generates executable tasks that stress these weaknesses, and the Solver is trained on the targeted tasks. On Tau2-Bench Retail with Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507, SENTINEL improves Pass^{}1 from 66.4 to 74.9 and outperforms RL on general synthetic tasks across Pass^{}k metrics. These results demonstrate that model failures provide an effective and scalable source of targeted training signal for improving tool-using language model agents.

Reinforcement learning for long-horizon language agents requires identifying whether intermediate actions make eventual task success more or less likely when supervision is available only at trajectory level. The main difficulty is that a critic with aggregate return-prediction accuracy may still fail to resolve the local value differences needed to assign credit to actions, especially under sparse feedback and function approximation. Conventional critics estimate future return, but policy improvement also depends on knowing whether each intermediate decision makes task success more or less likely. We introduce SCALE, an actor-critic framework that augments conventional return estimation with explicit prediction of eventual task success. At each interaction prefix, the critic predicts a return value and a Success Value, defined as the probability that the task will eventually be completed from that prefix. SCALE converts changes in Success Value into multi-step action credit through Success-GAE and modulates its contribution according to the estimated reliability of the predictor, while retaining the token-level PPO objective. Across five agent benchmarks and three model backbones, SCALE improves task performance over the compared RL baselines in most settings, with gains of up to 4.1 percentage points in success rate. Separate critic-learning analyses show that SCALE also improves critic estimation and training stability.

Language agents can adapt from experience in interactive environments, but current reflection-based methods can only self-correct within a single task instance. Whether such experience can be distilled into reusable lessons that improve performance on future unseen tasks remains unclear. We address this problem by introducing the In-context Training (ICT) task, a framework for evaluating cross-task self-improvement in language agents. In ICT, a reflector model observes trajectories collected by an actor model and generates system prompts intended to improve the actor's performance on future unseen tasks. We then propose an RL-based training pipeline for learning such reflections directly from experience, without human-provided examples. Across ALFWorld and MiniHack, our trained reflectors outperform an untrained baseline on most held-out task families, showing that the ability to learn from experience can itself be learned. In some cases, we observe generalisation beyond the benchmark on which the reflector was trained, to substantially different environments. Finally, we introduce MetaGym, a generic Python library for constructing meta-environments, enabling future research on self-improving language agents.