DHCG: Dynamic Construction of Hierarchical Collaboration Graphs for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Reasoning

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) typically optimize a single topology, restricting reasoning to a narrow trajectory and limiting comprehensive analytical capacity. Naively merging multiple topologies into a composite graph introduces redundant noise propagation across irrelevant connections, degrading solution quality. To address this dilemma, we propose \textbf{Hierarchical Sparse Coordination over a Union of Complementary Topologies for MAS (HELENA)}, a multi-agent framework that balances diverse reasoning paths with sparse task-dependent execution. \helena{} constructs a union MAS graph from complementary candidate topologies selected via Monte Carlo Tree Search and Determinantal Point Process, broadening the reasoning trajectory for comprehensive analysis of complex problems. A Hierarchical Sparse Coordination module then activates only a sparse subgraph at each step while agents exchange compressed latent briefs to suppress redundant noise propagation. Finally, a Local Self-Refinement stage identifies decision units with discrepancy evidence and rewrites them only when contrastive evidence simultaneously confirms a reliable solution-side failure and a challenger-side improvement. Experiments across eight benchmarks show that \helena{} achieves state-of-the-art results on all benchmarks, with an average gain of \pctup{3.47} over the strongest baseline and up to \pctup{10.34} on MMLU-Pro, achieving larger improvements on harder benchmarks at a reasonable additional cost.

Collaboration topology shapes both the performance and execution cost of LLM-based multi-agent systems. Because tasks differ in complexity and required capabilities, recent approaches generate task-specific collaboration graphs that specify agent participation and information flow. However, representative topology generators use either individual agents or predefined groups throughout an organization, overlooking differing collaboration needs across subtasks. Our key insight is to select granularity locally for each functional role, combining fine-grained control with reusable collaboration patterns within one organization. Learning such organizations requires exploring a combinatorial construction space with limited intermediate feedback from final-answer rewards. Therefore, we propose MAGIC, a dense-reward reinforcement learning framework for mixed-granularity graph generation. Specifically, MAGIC constructs a mixed-granularity agent graph by sequentially selecting a functional role, instantiating it as a single agent or reusable group, and connecting it to existing units. We directly optimize the construction policy using returns from trajectories sampled under the current policy and use potential-based reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback from probe-based utility and structural signals while preserving the cumulative task reward. MAGIC outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across eight benchmarks and demonstrates strong inference efficiency in our efficiency study.

LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph learning remains unexplored. Graph learning is a natural setting for such systems because useful evidence may arise from heterogeneous local, long-range, global structural, and semantic perspectives whose relevance varies across instances. Existing LLM-based graph learning approaches primarily rely on single-agent reasoning, while multi-agent coordination has been studied mainly in general reasoning settings. Consequently, it remains unclear whether multiple specialized agents can improve graph learning and how coordination strategies should be designed and evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce GraphMAS, a systematic benchmark of multi-agent coordination for graph learning. GraphMAS builds a shared pool of graph reasoning specialists and organizes coordination along two dimensions, inter-agent interaction and runtime adaptivity, yielding four paradigms and seven representative coordination methods. Under a unified protocol, we evaluate these methods across seven text-attributed graphs, three domains, and two graph learning tasks. We find that heterogeneous graph perspectives are complementary, and that coordinating specialists improves over individual specialists and single-agent graph reasoning, with gains from decomposing reasoning across specialists rather than from broader evidence access alone. However, richer inter-agent interaction does not reliably help, whereas instance-adaptive specialist selection yields the strongest accuracy-efficiency trade-off. We further show that coordination can be learned over a fixed specialist pool and transfers to held-out graphs. GraphMAS therefore provides a controlled evaluation framework and empirical principles for understanding when and how multi-agent coordination benefits graph learning.