Yoshikawa's Manipulability Index is generally used as a classical measure to define an optimal morphology of a manipulator. However, any such optimization is almost always studied as a purely kinematic quantity in simulation and is rarely validated on hardware. We present a reinforcement-learning framework with RSL-RL PPO that optimizes the morphology of a 2R SCARA-type manipulator arm with Yoshikawa's kinematic manipulability index as a core reward, and the analytically derived closed-form optimum for the circular task is used to verify that our method recovers it. Then the same method is applied to custom elliptical and rectangular paths having no analytical optimum. The RL-optimized morphologies are then transferred to a 2R hardware manipulator to validate its effect in reduction of joint load in the hardware. Compared to the worst morphology, the optimum morphology delivered by our method reduces second joint load by 38.4 +/- 0.6% for the ellipse path and 41.3 +/- 0.3% for the rectangle, and first joint load by 15%.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : The three task paths: circle (held at radius R ), ellipse, and rectangle.
Fig. 2 : Mean second-joint torque vs. manipulability w over a dense morphology sweep (simulation, EE mass +60 g): ellipse (top), rectangle (bottom), with the τ2∝w−p fit and OPT/MID/WC marked (from Section V-B ).
Term / role
Ellipse
Rectangle
manipulability ∣sinθ2∣ , wmanip
0.5
0.5
tracking wt (bandwidth α )
1.0 ( 2500 )
1.0 ( 2500 )
length reg. wℓ
0.5
0.5
corner floor wfloor ( δ )
—
0.2 ( 0.5 )
settle ramp γmax
2.0
6.0
slider speed ws
—
0.3
TABLE I : Reward weights for the trajectory tasks, code-verified against each branch. The ellipse uses the common reward chassis. The rectangle adds two terms (corner floor, slider speed) and retunes two ( γmax , action rate).
Fig. 3 : Hardware platform: (a) Planar 2R arm; (b) prismatic link stage; (c) the 60 g end-effector payload.
Task
wˉ
min∣sinθ2∣
Sim ∣τ2∣ [N ⋅ m]
HW ∣j2∣ [%]
∣trackerror∣ [mm]
Ellipse
OPT
0.030
0.84
0.20
8.74 ± 0.08
16.6 ± 0.0
MID
0.022
0.62
0.27
11.10 ± 0.05
17.8 ± 0.0
WC
0.016
0.30
0.36
14.18 ± 0.02
19.1 ± 0.0
Rect.
OPT
0.032
0.86
0.22
10.29 ± 0.06
18.6 ± 0.0
MID
0.024
0.60
0.31
13.53 ± 0.04
21.6 ± 0.0
WC
0.018
0.25
0.42
17.53 ± 0.03
30.2 ± 0.1
TABLE II : Per-morphology summary. Hardware values are the mean over ten repeated runs (one standard deviation shown), EE mass +60 g both simulation and hardware.
Robotic hands vary widely in anatomical fidelity and mechanical complexity, and these structural choices influence the coordination of joint motions and the difficulty of controlling the system. A unified framework is presented in which the kinematic and actuation stages are analysed separately and in composition, through the conditioning of the task Jacobian, the actuation matrix, and their product. It is applied to two hands representing opposing design philosophies, the Shadow Dexterous Hand and the Anatomically Correct, Biomechatronic Hand, along four morphological aspects: joint axis geometry, actuator-to-DOF ratio, coupling architecture, and authority distribution. All parameters are derived from the hands' canonical digital representations. Anatomical fidelity carries no uniform advantage: oblique axes improve thumb conditioning but leave the long fingers worse conditioned than the orthogonal-axis design, while the branching tendon network improves the effective control mapping at every long finger and worsens it significantly at the thumb, where actuator authority is concentrated on thumb opposition. Predictions derived from these metrics are evaluated against reinforcement learning experiments using PPO, DDPG+HER, and TQC+HER, across three different tasks.
Zalán Tari, Eszter Birtalan, Péter Polcz +1
Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Budapest, Hungary
This paper studies energy-aware manipulation as a physically grounded learning problem. We define a joint-space mechanical-work proxy from joint torque and angular displacement, and train a differentiable energy predictor that estimates this work from robot states and actions. The predictor converts a non-differentiable simulator-side physical quantity into a differentiable regularizer for fine-tuning a pretrained manipulation policy. We instantiate the framework with RVT-2 on RLBench and evaluate 12 manipulation tasks involving object contact, articulated motion, placement, pushing, and sweeping. The proposed fine-tuning reduces the average mechanical work from 208.8J to 204.4J (i.e., 2.1% reduction), while the mean task success rate also increases slightly from 86.2% to 86.9%. These results show that work-aware policy optimization can suppress physically inefficient motion without requiring an explicit differentiable dynamics model.
Reinforcement learning for robot manipulation is often bottlenecked by reward design, especially in long-horizon tasks: sparse success rewards provide weak supervision, while hand-crafted dense rewards are tedious to design and generalize poorly across tasks. Progress-based reward models offer a promising alternative by estimating how far an observation has advanced toward task completion, but existing approaches often require task-specific demonstrations or progress labels, and can assign high rewards to visually plausible but physically incorrect states. We introduce the Reference-Anchored Reward Model (RARM), a lightweight visual comparator that converts a single successful demonstration into a dense, progress-aware reward. RARM is trained once on general-purpose videos with a contrastive temporal objective, requiring no robot-specific data, task-specific reward labels, or per-task reward engineering. At deployment, RARM matches rollout clips to reference clips and rewards only confident forward progress, suppressing uncertain matches that may otherwise produce false-positive rewards. Across 9 simulated manipulation tasks from LIBERO and MetaWorld and 4 real-world tasks, RARM achieves the best overall success rates in subsequent RL training, with particularly large gains on long-horizon tasks such as cloth folding, where unreliable progress estimates are especially harmful.
Pengzhi Yang, Xinyu Wang, Pengyu Jing +7
NUS Human-Centered Robotic Lab · ‡ Booking.com · University of Cambridge +1