FPTAS for Polygonal Multi-Robot Motion Planning

We study unlabeled MRMP for unit-disk robots in a polygonal environment. Although the problem is hard in general, polynomial-time solutions exist under appropriate separation assumptions on start and target positions. Banyassady et al.(SoCG'22) guarantee feasibility in simple polygons under start--start and target--target distances of at least $4$, and start--target distances of at least $3$, but without optimality guarantees. Solovey et al.(RSS'15) provide a near-optimal solution in general polygonal domains, under stricter conditions: start/target positions must have pairwise distance at least $4$, and at least $\sqrt{5}\approx2.236$ from obstacles. This raises the question of whether polynomial-time algorithms can be obtained in even more densely packed environments. In this paper we present a generalized algorithm that achieve different tradeoffs on the robots-separation $ρ$ and obstacles-separation $ω$, all significantly improving upon the state of the art. Specifically, we obtain polynomial-time constant-approximation algorithms to minimize the total path length when (i) $ρ=2\frac{2}{3}$ and $ω=1\frac{2}{3}$, or (ii) $ρ\approx3.291$ and $ω\approx1.354$. These solutions are weakly-monotone; we also provide a monotone solution requiring $ω=\approx1.614$ and $ρ=4$. We prove that monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.614$, and weakly-monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.354$. We then present tradeoffs between the separation bounds and the approximation factor, specifically achieving an (almost) optimal bound of $ρ=2$ at the cost of a linear approximation factor and requiring $ω=2$. This applies also for the labeled variant of MRMP, in which case we show a tight bound on $ω$. Finally, we show that without any robots-separation assumption, obstacles-separation of at least $1.5$ may be necessary for a solution to exist.

Multi-robot task and motion planning (MR-TAMP) requires jointly reasoning about discrete task decisions and continuous collision-free motions of multiple interacting robots. Although asymptotically optimal algorithms have been developed for task and motion planning, extending these guarantees to the multi-robot setting introduces an important challenge: different task transitions may involve different subsets of robots and therefore impose constraints of different dimensions on the composite configuration space. Consequently, an asymptotically optimal planner must not only optimize motion within each task mode, but also ensure sufficient exploration of the different types of transitions connecting them. We characterize this transition structure and establish sufficient conditions for global asymptotic optimality in MR-TAMP, requiring persistent coverage of relevant transitions and asymptotically improving motion planning within connected feasible regions. Based on these conditions, we develop an efficient asymptotically optimal MR-TAMP algorithm that combines evolving individual-robot roadmaps with implicit tensor-product search, avoiding explicit construction of the composite roadmap. The planner further employs conditional transition sampling, lazy collision checking, and mode- and solution-level guidance to improve finite-time planning efficiency while retaining persistent exploration. The resulting framework provides asymptotic optimality guarantees for multi-robot manipulation while efficiently exploiting the structure of individual-robot motion planning.

In this paper, we investigate the Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning problem from a robot motion planning perspective. The problem involves determining a feasible path to a goal location by displacing movable obstacles when no collision-free path initially exists. We show that this problem is computationally challenging and, in particular, NP-hard when obstacles are modeled as polygons in the plane. Besides an exact formulation of the minimum obstacle displacement problem generalizing other problems in the literature, and the associated optimal solution, this paper proposes an approximate solution that is less intensive from a computational standpoint, and differs from the optimal solution by a fraction of the optimal cost, being able to trade-off between path length and amount of obstacle displacements.