Reflect After Failure: Brain-Inspired Self-Evolving Agents for Embodied Spatial Intelligence

Spatial intelligence is becoming a foundation for embodied agents, robotic planning, and multimodal assistants. To improve the spatial reasoning ability of VLMs, existing work has mainly followed two lines. One line uses post-training methods, such as supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Another line adopts an agentic paradigm in which the model calls external spatial tools to gather intermediate spatial evidence. We study a complementary and underexplored route: Can a frozen VLM agent improve its spatial reasoning through parameter-update-free self-evolution, without depending on external expert spatial tools at inference time? We present Spatial Memory Agent (SMA), an experience-grounded runtime memory framework that converts verified spatial experience into reusable transferable lessons. Specifically, SMA first queries the frozen VLM in a verifiable spatial environment, obtains a predicted answer and reward, and uses verifier-guided reflection to distill compact transferable lessons stored in memory cards. SMA further assigns each memory card a Transfer Reliability Score (TRS), which is initialized uniformly and calibrated from later retrieval outcomes as visit evidence of future transfer reliability. During read-only deployment, SMA retrieves memory cards through semantic filtering and combined similarity--TRS ranking, allowing the retrieved memory to guide frozen model inference. Experiments across five representative spatial benchmarks show that SMA achieves the best macro-average accuracy for all four base VLMs and the best accuracy in most individual evaluations, establishing a practical parameter-update-free path for spatial self-evolution through reusable experience.

Spatial reasoning agents can inspect tool outputs and repair errors, but reusing these lessons requires preserving both the computation and the conditions that make it valid. We introduce EvoSpatial, a framework that learns from execution experience by updating a library of linked skills and tools. Skills describe procedures, geometric assumptions, and verification steps; tools implement the operations those procedures require. When solving a task, the agent retrieves relevant skills and synthesizes reusable computational functions if existing tools are insufficient. After each task, execution feedback and evidence checks guide skill revision and tool consolidation, without ground-truth answers or benchmark scores. Across 20 benchmarks, EvoSpatial averages 63.9, 4.0 percentage points above the average reported by SpatialClaw. The evolved library also improves held-out and cross-benchmark performance when updates are disabled, and trajectories generated with evolved skills improve supervised fine-tuning, even without external skills at evaluation. Keeping checked procedures on record, together with the tools that support them, lets an agent carry spatial reasoning experience from one task to the next.

Spatial intelligence unfolds through a perception-action loop: agents act to acquire observations, and reason about how observations vary as a function of action. Rather than passively processing what is seen, they actively uncover what is unseen - occluded structure, dynamics, containment, and functionality that cannot be resolved from passive sensing alone. We move beyond prior formulations of spatial intelligence that assume oracle observations by recasting the observer as an actor. We introduce ESI-BENCH, a comprehensive benchmark for embodied spatial intelligence spanning 10 task categories and 29 subcategories built on OmniGibson, grounded in Spelke's core knowledge systems. Agents must decide what abilities to deploy - perception, locomotion, and manipulation - and how to sequence them to actively accumulate task-relevant evidence. We conduct extensive experiments on state-of-the-art MLLMs and find that active exploration substantially outperforms passive counterparts, with agents spontaneously discovering emergent spatial strategies without explicit instructions, while random multi-view often adds noise rather than signal despite consuming far more images. Most failures stem not from weak perception but from action blindness: poor action choices lead to poor observations, which in turn drive cascading errors. While explicit 3D grounding stabilizes reasoning on depth-sensitive tasks, imperfect 3D representation proves more harmful than 2D baselines by distorting spatial relations. Human studies further reveal that unlike humans who seek falsifying viewpoints and revise beliefs under contradiction, models commit prematurely with high confidence regardless of evidence quality, exposing a metacognitive gap that neither better perception nor more embodied interaction alone can close.