SHRED: Self-Play for Heterogeneous Road-Users without Expert Demonstrations

Realistic highway simulation is critical for scalable safety evaluation of autonomous vehicles, particularly for interactions that are too rare to study from logged data alone. Yet highway traffic generation remains challenging because it requires broad coverage across speeds and maneuvers, controllable generation of rare safety-critical scenarios, and behavioral credibility in multi-agent interactions. We present PHASE, Policy for Heterogeneous Agent Self-play on Expressway, a context-aware self-play framework that addresses these three requirements through explicit per-agent conditioning for controllability, synthetic scenario generation for broad highway coverage, and closed-loop multi-agent training for realistic interaction dynamics. PHASE further supports different vehicle profiles, for example, passenger cars and articulated trailer trucks, within a single policy via vehicle-aware dynamics and context-conditioned actions, and stabilizes self-play with early termination of unrecoverable states, at-fault collision attribution, highway-aware reward shaping, coupled curricula, and robust policy optimization. Despite being trained only on synthetic data, PHASE transfers zero-shot to 512 unseen high-interaction real scenarios in exiD, achieving a 96.3% success rate and reducing ADE/FDE from 6.57/12.07 m to 2.44/5.25 m relative to a prior self-play baseline. In a learned trajectory embedding space, it also improves behavioral realism over IDM, reducing Frechet trajectory distance by 13.1% and energy distance by 20.2%. These results show that synthetic self-play can provide a scalable route to controllable and realistic highway scenario generation without direct imitation of expert logs.

Closed-loop traffic simulation requires agents that are both scalable and behaviorally realistic. Recent self-play reinforcement learning approaches demonstrate strong scalability, but their equilibrium strategies fail to capture the socially aware behaviors of real human drivers. We propose a hierarchical architecture that goes beyond self-play by combining high-level multi-agent interaction reasoning with low-level continuous trajectory realization. Specifically, a Stackelberg-style Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) module generates interaction-aware intention commands. These commands condition a low-level continuous motion module, translating the strategic intent into physically consistent, scene-responsive control sequences. To mitigate distribution shift in closed-loop deployment, we introduce a hybrid co-training scheme combining MARL with auxiliary recovery supervision. Experiments on a SUMO-based urban network demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior control smoothness and safety compared to self-play and passive imitation baselines, while maintaining competitive traffic efficiency.

Recent Autonomous Driving (AD) works such as GigaFlow and PufferDrive have unlocked Reinforcement Learning (RL) at scale as a training strategy for driving policies. Yet such policies remain disconnected from established benchmarks, leaving the performance of large-scale RL for driving on standardized evaluations unknown. We present BehaviorBench -- a comprehensive test suite that closes this gap along three axes: Evaluation, Complexity, and Behavior Diversity. In terms of Evaluation, we provide an interface connecting PufferDrive to nuPlan, which, for the first time, enables policies trained via RL at scale to be evaluated on an established planning benchmark for autonomous driving. Complementarily, we offer an evaluation framework that allows planners to be benchmarked directly inside the PufferDrive simulation, at a fraction of the time. Regarding Complexity, we observe that today's standardized benchmarks are so simple that near-perfect scores are achievable by straight lane following with collision checking. We extract a meaningful, interaction-rich split from the Waymo Open Motion Dataset (WOMD) on which strong performance is impossible without multi-agent reasoning. Lastly, we address Behavior Diversity. Existing benchmarks commonly evaluate planners against a single rule-based traffic model, the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM). We provide a diverse suite of interactive traffic agents to stress-test policies under heterogeneous behaviors, beyond just using IDM. Overall, our benchmarking analysis uncovers the following insight: despite learning interactive behaviors in an emergent manner, policies trained via pure self-play under standard reward functions overfit to their training opponents and fail to generalize to other traffic agent behaviors. Building on this observation, we propose a hybrid planner that combines a PPO policy with a rule-based planner.