cs.LGOct 20, 2026

Lower Bounds for Smooth Nonconvex Zeroth-Order Optimization: The Price of Determinism under Low Curvature Trace

Authors: Yuxing Peng, Zhiqing Tang, Weijia Jia

Organizations: Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Future Networks, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China · Guangdong Key Lab of AI and Multi-Modal Data Processing, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai 519087, China

Abstract

Low curvature trace, an effective rank condition, is a common explanation for why randomized zeroth-order methods scale to high-dimensional tasks such as language model fine-tuning. Can deterministic methods achieve the same savings? We show that they cannot. We study finding ε\varepsilon-stationary points of LL-smooth nonconvex functions on Rd\mathbb{R}^d from exact function values, assuming that below the starting value the Hessian is dominated by a fixed matrix with trace at most LELE; this is a fixed-matrix form of the effective rank condition used to explain zeroth-order fine-tuning. When ET≤dET\le d, the Gaussian two-point method that such fine-tuning uses needs only O(ET)O(ET) calls if it rejects steps that raise ff, where T=LΔ/ε2T=LΔ/\varepsilon^2 is the iteration count of gradient descent from initial gap ΔΔ, and we prove that every randomized method needs Ω(ET)Ω(ET) calls, so this cost is optimal up to constants. In contrast, every deterministic method needs Ω~(dmin⁡{T,ET})\widetildeΩ(d\min\{T,\sqrt{ET}\}) calls, and adaptive subspace search attains O(dmin⁡{T,ET})O(d\min\{T,\sqrt{ET}\}): a deterministic method pays about dd calls per discovered direction, and the trace budget allows about ET\sqrt{ET} directions. Determinism thus multiplies the cost by a factor of order d/(E+ET)d/(E+\sqrt{ET}) up to logarithmic factors, which grows linearly with dd for fixed EE and TT; once EE exceeds TT by a logarithmic factor, deterministic methods need Ω(dT)Ω(dT) calls, as without any trace budget. Our lower bounds hold for C∞C^\infty functions with the matrix bound on all of Rd\mathbb{R}^d, even when each call also returns gradient projections priced by rank.

Explore similar work

Oct 14, 2026

On Global Joint Lower Bounds in Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Optimization

Recent work has sought to transfer first-order nonconvex optimization guarantees to zeroth-order methods through gradient estimators, typically incurring a factor linear in dd. \citet{kornowski2024} obtained an O(dδ−1ε−3)\mathcal{O}(dδ^{-1}ε^{-3}) oracle complexity for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization and asked whether its dependence on all three parameters is jointly optimal. Although the dimension dependence and the first-order dependence on (δ,ε)(δ,ε) are separately known to be unavoidable, a matching zeroth-order lower bound has remained open. We answer this question in the unrestricted full-space setting. For smooth stochastic nonconvex optimization, we establish a scalar-oracle lower bound of Ω ⁣(dL02min⁡{ΔH,L02}/ε4)Ω\!\left(dL_0^2\min\{ΔH,L_0^2\}/ε^4\right) assuming a smooth, globally lower-bounded population objective and a second-moment bound on sample Lipschitz constants. A smooth reduction then yields a lower bound for Goldstein stationarity, proving the joint minimax optimality of the dependence on (d,δ,ε)(d,δ,ε) under explicit high-dimensional and small-accuracy conditions. Crucially, our results allow algorithms to query arbitrary points in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, adaptively select sample-function labels, reuse the same sampled function at any number of locations, and output points without spatial restrictions. Thus, unlike lower bounds based on bounded query regions or fresh evaluation noise, our guarantees apply to a fully adaptive, reusable-sample scalar oracle. We also establish a separate noiseless exact-value lower bound against randomized algorithms, and hence also against deterministic methods. Our proof combines a globally defined sequential nonconvex construction with an exact Gaussian scalar channel, multistage random-field estimates, and an antithetic finite-sample realization that preserves information hardness under adaptive reuse.
Jun 3, 2026

Sharp First-Order Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Smooth Nonconvex Optimization

We study the deterministic first-order oracle complexity of finding εε-stationary points in smooth nonconvex optimization when the objective satisfies higher-order smoothness assumptions. While the classical ε−2ε^{-2} rate is optimal under only Lipschitz gradients, higher-order smoothness leads to accelerated first-order upper bounds, most notably the ε−7/4ε^{-7/4} rate under Lipschitz Hessians and the ε−5/3ε^{-5/3} rate under Lipschitz third derivatives. The matching lower bounds, however, have remained open. We resolve this gap by proving a new dimension-free first-order lower bound for higher-order smooth nonconvex functions, valid for every finite smoothness order. In particular, our construction gives a matching Ω(ε−7/4)Ω(ε^{-7/4}) lower bound in the Hessian-Lipschitz case and a matching Ω(ε−5/3)Ω(ε^{-5/3}) lower bound in the third-order-smooth regime. The hard instance is based on a block-chain mechanism that enforces blockwise oracle revelation while preserving the smoothness structure needed for the scalar hard instance. The lower-bound construction was discovered with the assistance of ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and subsequently verified by the authors.
May 23, 2026

Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise

This paper considers the nonconvex nonsmooth problem in which the objective function is Lipschitz continuous. We focus on the stochastic setting where the algorithm can access stochastic function value evaluations with heavy-tailed noise, which is prevalent in many popular machine learning applications. We propose a stochastic zeroth-order algorithm that refines the framework of online-to-nonconvex conversion by clipping the two-point gradient estimator. The theoretical analysis shows that our algorithm can find a (δ,ε)(δ, ε)-Goldstein stationary point with zeroth-order oracle complexity of O(dp2(p−1)δ−1ε−2p−1p−1){\mathcal O}(d^{\frac{p}{2(p-1)}}δ^{-1}ε^{-\frac{2p-1}{p-1}}), where dd is the problem dimension and p∈(1,2]p\in(1,2] is the order of bounded moments. Note that our dependence on dimension dd matches the best-known results of stochastic zeroth-order optimization for finding the sub-optimal solution of a stochastic convex nonsmooth problem. In addition, our dependence on accuracy parameters δδ and εε is consistent with that of the best-known stochastic first-order algorithms for stochastic nonconvex nonsmooth problems. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.