From Reasoning to Action: Benchmarking Frontier AI Models on LIBERO-10 Robot Manipulation Tasks

General-purpose agents can plan, use tools, and revise their behavior from feedback, but it remains unclear whether these capabilities transfer from digital environments to embodied manipulation. To investigate this question, we introduce LIBERO-Agent, an agent-native benchmark for evaluating these agents in robot manipulation tasks. Rather than asking agents to submit task-level Python control programs or operate through high-level robot skills, LIBERO-Agent provides an interactive robotic environment where agents can select which observations to inspect, process them with their own tools, and issue native action commands. LIBERO-Agent integrates 200 tasks into a common interaction framework and provides a 30-task primary suite that separates perception, short-horizon execution, and long-horizon composition. Results reveal a pronounced reliability gap: while agents perform well on perception and easy short-horizon tasks, their performance degrades substantially on hard short-horizon and long-horizon tasks. Richer observations improve short-horizon manipulation, while demonstration benefits depend on the agent and format. Among these agents, GPT-6 Astra achieves the strongest overall performance. Further analysis shows its major advantage lies in mechanism interaction, especially when sustained physical contact is needed, while its remaining failures stem from cross-stage interference and geometric errors.

Recent studies have explored the potential of multimodal large language models for robot control, yet the models' embodied capabilities remain insufficiently characterized across models, tasks, and execution settings. We conduct a multidimensional comparative evaluation on RoboColiseum across four tracks: Instruction Following, Spatial Reasoning, General Manipulation, and Robustness. We implement Agent2Act, a control harness that integrates GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, and Gemini 4 Argon into the evaluation environment through shared observation, action execution, and feedback interfaces. Under common task settings and scoring criteria, all four models exhibit a consistent capability profile: high instruction-following scores, with three approaching perfect performance; strong spatial reasoning; and general manipulation scores below those of the other three tracks. Within the evaluated configurations, Astra leads instruction following and robustness, while Opus leads spatial reasoning, general manipulation, and overall performance. These results reveal complementary strengths across models and a persistent gap between task understanding and reliable physical execution. Component comparisons on selected tasks further show that harness design affects task success, planning cost, and execution time. Additionally, case studies with Astra examine whole-body coordination, manipulation across robot embodiments, precision manipulation, dexterous-hand manipulation, and real-robot tasks, providing further insight into the model's capabilities and limitations across embodied tasks.

Recent advances in visuospatial understanding and agentic reasoning enable direct robotic manipulation with general-purpose multimodal models, but their embodied capabilities remain poorly understood. This paper systematically evaluate GPT-6 Astra for closed-loop robotic manipulation using a lightweight agent execution framework. We first probe three fundamental embodied capabilities-depth perception, embodied in-context learning, and tactile understanding-and demonstrate that the model can exploit depth information, acquire simple manipulation strategies from contextual demonstrations, and use tactile feedback to correct its actions. We then evaluate GPT-6 Astra across five established manipulation benchmarks along six capability dimensions. Despite competitive performance on several benchmarks-26.92% success on RoboDojo and 76.0% on RoboTwin 2.0-our analysis reveals a pronounced gap between semantic reasoning and physical execution, particularly in consequence-aware action planning, precision, and complex motion coordination. To further examine these limitations, we introduce LIBERO-GeoMotion, a new benchmark of geometry-constrained tasks that require precise pose alignment, coordinated translation and rotation, and anticipation of physical action consequences. GPT-6 Astra achieves only 11.1% zero-shot success, exposing the difficulty of translating spatial understanding into physically feasible motion. Real-world experiments corroborate these findings: zero-shot execution is feasible for simple tasks, yet persistent deficits remain in motion feasibility, precise control, and physical safety, while substantial inference latency further hinders practical deployment. Overall, our results characterize the emerging embodied capabilities of general-purpose multimodal models and delineate the key challenges toward safe, efficient, and reliable robotic manipulation.